Global censorship on vaccine dissent

[Sparks]

1 hour ago, servant4christ said:

Al Gore is certainly suspect. I don't remember the IPCC ever claiming that Florida should be under water.

That's where he gets his data.  The IPCC.  The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, run through the UN.  They want your money.

[servant4christ]

2 hours ago, Sparks said:

That's where he gets his data.  The IPCC.  The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, run through the UN.  They want your money.

I get this, but I'm not certain that IPCC ever stated that Florida would be underwater in 2022. Do you have a source for this claim?

[Sparks]

2 hours ago, servant4christ said:

I get this, but I'm not certain that IPCC ever stated that Florida would be underwater in 2022. Do you have a source for this claim?

It was in Al Gore's book, and movie.  In the movie, he had great graphics showing water rushing in.  Of course, it never happened.  It never does.  As far as the IPCC, they got hacked and their emails were exposed, and they told of the fake math they were using to project all this nonsense.  Somehow facts like that never stick, though.  It is already forgotten that they lied.

If you want to see all the logic fallacies, fakes science, and outright lies used by the IPCC, look up a man named Lord Christopher Monckton on Rumble or YouTube.  He is the 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, used to work in politics as an advisor but is an absolute wizard with math.  You could call him the anti-Al Gore.  He testified before congress a few times, and makes some great presentations about how nothing is happening concerning the climate, and that seems to be what we observe.  

[servant4christ]

If Al Gore's book/movie featured Florida going underwater, I sincerely doubt that was based on the IPCC. I still have seen nothing indicating that the IPCC predicted that Florida would be underwater by 2022. If you can't actually back it up, then it is only a rumor.

[teddyv]

8 hours ago, servant4christ said:

This is a quote from your reference.

"Antarctica’s climate was once warm enough to sustain substantial vegetation including trees. How warm? Some estimates place it at 20 degrees warmer than present day.

That temperature was determined after studies were conducted on sediment core samples that contained plant leaf wax. The samples were pulled from beneath the Ross Ice Shelf. According the data that the team gathered, 15-20 million years ago the Antarctic was a far warmer and wetter place than previously imagined. Temperatures have been estimated reaching as much as 45 degrees Fahrenheit and precipitation was several times higher than what the region currently experiences."

I don't know about you, but I'm not certain human civilization will be here in the few million years it may take for the cycle to reduce temperature again.

Due to plate tectonics, Antarctica was likely not situated at the South Pole back then. I'd have to look up where it would have been though.

[Sparks]

12 hours ago, servant4christ said:

If Al Gore's book/movie featured Florida going underwater, I sincerely doubt that was based on the IPCC. I still have seen nothing indicating that the IPCC predicted that Florida would be underwater by 2022. If you can't actually back it up, then it is only a rumor.

Sounds to me like you just didn't look.  I told you to look up Lord Christopher Monckton.  He is the one who takes on the IPCC, and Al Gore.  As I said, the IPCC is where Al gets his data.  Al is not a scientists you know.

The graphs in this report show the IPCC's 'hot' assessments, versus reality at the time. 

SPPI Monthly CO2 REport

[Rick-Parker]

22 hours ago, servant4christ said:

I don't know about you, but I'm not certain human civilization will be here in the few million years it may take for the cycle to reduce temperature again.

It certainly won't in its present form, but you have just stated that the weather is cyclical. Anyway....

[servant4christ]

5 hours ago, Sparks said:

Sounds to me like you just didn't look.  I told you to look up Lord Christopher Monckton.  He is the one who takes on the IPCC, and Al Gore.  As I said, the IPCC is where Al gets his data.  Al is not a scientists you know.

The graphs in this report show the IPCC's 'hot' assessments, versus reality at the time. 

SPPI Monthly CO2 REport

Of course I didn't look. You still haven't backed up your first claim. Why would I move on to the next?

[servant4christ]

5 hours ago, Rick-Parker said:

It certainly won't in its present form, but you have just stated that the weather is cyclical. Anyway....

So... we just need to be patient for a few million years for global warming to reverse itself again?

[Sparks]

1 minute ago, servant4christ said:

Of course I didn't look. You still haven't backed up your first claim. Why would I move on to the next?

Did you click on the report in my last post?  It's the evidence you asked for.