Jump to content
IGNORED

NIH : Booster should be discontinued


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,628
  • Content Per Day:  1.15
  • Reputation:   304
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/23/2020
  • Status:  Offline

5 hours ago, missmuffet said:

Yes, I agree. 

You agree with paranoid nonsense???

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  34
  • Topic Count:  1,993
  • Topics Per Day:  0.48
  • Content Count:  48,691
  • Content Per Day:  11.76
  • Reputation:   30,343
  • Days Won:  226
  • Joined:  01/11/2013
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, JimmyB said:

You agree with paranoid nonsense???

That is the way you see it, not me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  6,159
  • Content Per Day:  2.03
  • Reputation:   2,513
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  01/20/2016
  • Status:  Offline

12 hours ago, teddyv said:

Ok.

I know what Libertarians are.

No doubt.  It's their interest in freedoms that would likely stump you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  4,265
  • Content Per Day:  2.90
  • Reputation:   2,302
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  05/03/2020
  • Status:  Offline

34 minutes ago, Sparks said:

No doubt.  It's their interest in freedoms that would likely stump you.

I'm not sure why this comment was needed. I guess our relationship is so strained we view each other with automatic suspicion even when asking a simple.question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  6,159
  • Content Per Day:  2.03
  • Reputation:   2,513
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  01/20/2016
  • Status:  Offline

On 9/20/2022 at 10:14 PM, teddyv said:

I'm not sure why this comment was needed. I guess our relationship is so strained we view each other with automatic suspicion even when asking a simple.question.

Could be. 

I thought the "Sovereign Citizen" comment you made was intended to strike a nerve because many think they are misinformed, or crazy.  It didn't have a positive tone, but maybe I missed the friendly tone you had intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  200
  • Topics Per Day:  0.23
  • Content Count:  4,273
  • Content Per Day:  4.86
  • Reputation:   1,855
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/17/2021
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  06/03/1955

On 9/19/2022 at 11:27 PM, one.opinion said:

I stand corrected. You get your misinformed drivel from Libertarian websites. Thank you for the clarification.

And you get all your misinformed drivel from government agency and "medical" websites that only spew the party line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.09
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

28 minutes ago, Rick-Parker said:

And you get all your misinformed drivel from government agency and "medical" websites that only spew the party line.

I get information from peer-reviewed journals and government agencies that collect information from hospitals. I know some people don’t like that, but they really are better resources for accurate information than fringe websites and social media.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  23
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  6,159
  • Content Per Day:  2.03
  • Reputation:   2,513
  • Days Won:  8
  • Joined:  01/20/2016
  • Status:  Offline

19 hours ago, one.opinion said:

I get information from peer-reviewed journals and government agencies that collect information from hospitals. I know some people don’t like that, but they really are better resources for accurate information than fringe websites and social media.

Government tends to lie, and peer reviews are often from silos that are paid to lie.  I have shown you this, you even seemed to understand the problems, once.  When I have shown you when government figures sometimes deny their own public statements, you run to the liberal media, which is really the defacto fourth branch of government; the propaganda wing.

Scientists always argue, and there is not agreement on anything and that is the way it is supposed to be in the science field.  When they agree 100%, someone has censored the other half.

By the way, this is what gives so much strength to the 70 elder translators of the Septuagint.  When do 70 people agree on anything?  70 people typically could not even agree on pizza toppings.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  29
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,240
  • Content Per Day:  2.09
  • Reputation:   1,356
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  07/03/2017
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, Sparks said:

Government tends to lie

This is often the case. However, the CDC is collecting information from hospitals and hospitals are not finding the need to correct their published numbers.

2 hours ago, Sparks said:

peer reviews are often from silos that are paid to lie

Academic silo-ing has been significantly reduced with COVID. There are multitudes of researchers that have other areas of specialty that jumped in to help with COVID research. The collaboration has been unprecedented. If you are accusing COVID researchers of lying, you should probably have some sort of evidence ready.

2 hours ago, Sparks said:

I have shown you this, you even seemed to understand the problems, once.

You showed me one individual working in an area that very few people were working on that was able to get away with repeatedly publishing false evidence. The situation is very different from what we see currently with COVID.

2 hours ago, Sparks said:

When I have shown you when government figures sometimes deny their own public statements, you run to the liberal media

Maybe you could provide an example rather than making vague derogatory statements.

2 hours ago, Sparks said:

Scientists always argue, and there is not agreement on anything and that is the way it is supposed to be in the science field.

Agreed. That's why we have things like Dr. Yamamoto writing letters that get published even when he is misrepresenting his sources.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,628
  • Content Per Day:  1.15
  • Reputation:   304
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/23/2020
  • Status:  Offline

I am going for my third Moderna booster -- my fifth COVID vaccination -- in an hour and I am still thriving.  What is it that doubters and cynics can't understand about preventative medicine?

 

As I have said previously, I have been vaccinated many times against a variety of diseases.  And you know what?  I'm doing just fine!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...