Black Hole Burbs Out a Star

[SavedOnebyGrace]

https://www.foxnews.com/science/astronomers-shocked-when-black-hole-burps-out-star

Astronomers were stunned when a black hole burped out a star it had consumed three years ago, according to a new study analyzing the galactic event. 

The study, published in the Astrophysical Journal last week, detailed how scientists saw a black hole swallow a small star located 665 million light years away from Earth. However, in June 2021, the same black hole began ejecting material that traveled at half the speed of light. 

"This caught us completely by surprise – no one has ever seen anything like this before," said Yvette Cendes, a co-author of the study and a research associate at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian. 

[Marathoner]

Black holes are fascinating, brother. I recall recent astronomical observations which reveal the enigmatic nature of black holes: they are not what we once believed them to be. Stars have been witnessed forming at the nucleus of various galaxies; most galaxies host an enormous black hole at their center. Sagittarius A is the mind-boggling black hole at the center of our own galaxy (the Milky Way). 

My opinion? A black hole is a dark matter star. Considering their incomprehensible mass compared to stars of the visible spectrum, and the fact that the bulk of the universal mass is invisible (postulated to be dark matter), it makes sense. Of course, I could be wrong. 

[Guest]

Because no one has directly observed dark matter yet – assuming it exists – it must barely interact with ordinary baryonic matter and radiation except through gravity. Dark matter is thought to be non-baryonic; it may be composed of some as-yet-undiscovered subatomic particles. The primary candidate for dark matter is some new kind of elementary particle that has not yet been discovered, particularly weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs),[14] Many experiments to directly detect and study dark matter particles are being actively undertaken, but none have yet succeeded.[15] Dark matter is classified as "cold," "warm," or "hot" according to its velocity (more precisely, its free streaming length). Current models favor a cold dark matter scenario, in which structures emerge by the gradual accumulation of particles.

Although the scientific community generally accepts dark matter's existence,[16] some astrophysicists, intrigued by specific observations that are not well-explained by ordinary dark matter, argue for various modifications of the standard laws of general relativity. These include modified Newtonian dynamics, tensor–vector–scalar gravity, or entropic gravity. These models attempt to account for all observations without invoking supplemental non-baryonic matter.  [from Wikipedia]

In a religious perspective, are we limiting God's majesty to this galaxy and a 6000 year history? Are we missing out on the breadth of God's creation by our limited minds?

Edited October 20, 2022 by Saved.One.by.Grace

[Eman_3]

On 10/19/2022 at 8:31 PM, Marathoner said:

A black hole is a dark matter star.

Dark matter is an unknown and presently unexplored mass that is presently undetectable. That is the sole reason it is called "Dark", it is a mystery.

A black hole possesses so much gravity that light itself ca not escape from it. They are not one and the same.

[other one]

maybe it's a portal for a worm hole and whatever pops in one end pops  out the other

[Eman_3]

Black holes can consume stars, that is an observable fact. They can consume at a maximum rate, and often a lot of matter is ejected.

 

This black hole did not burp out a star, it ejected what remained from a star it consumed.

https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/weve-never-seen-anything-black-hole-spews-out-material-years-after-shredding-star

[Eman_3]

Just now, other one said:

maybe it's a portal for a worm hole and whatever pops in one end pops  out the other

That is an interesting proposition because the math on black holes suggests a worm hole may be possible. Mathematically.

But realistically, the gravity from a black hole destroys everything that comes close. Whatever is drawn in is spaghettified, and destroyed, and if there was a wormhole, what comes out would definitely not resemble what entered. If it could ever escape.

[other one]

25 minutes ago, Eman_3 said:

That is an interesting proposition because the math on black holes suggests a worm hole may be possible. Mathematically.

But realistically, the gravity from a black hole destroys everything that comes close. Whatever is drawn in is spaghettified, and destroyed, and if there was a wormhole, what comes out would definitely not resemble what entered. If it could ever escape.

and we know this how?   apparently it spits out stars now and then.

[Eman_3]

2 hours ago, other one said:

and we know this how?   apparently it spits out stars now and then.

Black holes were discovered by the mathematics of cosmology. They were later verified to exist by observation, and recently imaging. Math defines their properties although every cosmologist will admit that when you get to black holes the math gets very weird.

The same math that defined and predicted black holes also describes how they act and their influence on other stellar bodies and anything within reach of their gravity.

Black holes could be defined as Shiva, the great destroyer.

When any object gets within the influence of a black hole, it is drawn in, and the differences in gravity will spaghettify any object. The sun that was consumed by the black hole died a death of slow consumption. It did not just fall into the black hole, it was slowly torn apart. Think of black holes as messy eaters. They just do not consume everything neatly. A lot of radiation and material is flung outward.

The interesting difference between this specific event and "normal" consumption of a star by a black hole is how long a period of time existed between consumption and the ejection of material. Additionally, the outflow of material was a lot more than a "normal" star meal.

[other one]

9 hours ago, Eman_3 said:

Black holes were discovered by the mathematics of cosmology. They were later verified to exist by observation, and recently imaging. Math defines their properties although every cosmologist will admit that when you get to black holes the math gets very weird.

The same math that defined and predicted black holes also describes how they act and their influence on other stellar bodies and anything within reach of their gravity.

Black holes could be defined as Shiva, the great destroyer.

When any object gets within the influence of a black hole, it is drawn in, and the differences in gravity will spaghettify any object. The sun that was consumed by the black hole died a death of slow consumption. It did not just fall into the black hole, it was slowly torn apart. Think of black holes as messy eaters. They just do not consume everything neatly. A lot of radiation and material is flung outward.

The interesting difference between this specific event and "normal" consumption of a star by a black hole is how long a period of time existed between consumption and the ejection of material. Additionally, the outflow of material was a lot more than a "normal" star meal.

Mathematics also gives us "M" string physics and black holes could just as easily be portals to upper dimensions where math gets a little squirrely also.