jesusandliberty Posted August 11, 2023 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 34 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 157 Content Per Day: 0.57 Reputation: 53 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/08/2023 Status: Offline Share Posted August 11, 2023 2 hours ago, JimmyB said: Are you a lawyer? I repeat: in Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980), the Supreme Court ruled that a Kentucky law that required the posting of the Ten Commandments on the wall of every public school classroom in the state violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment because the purpose of the display was essentially religious. If you think the Supreme Court's ruling was wrong, please state the legal basis of your decision. Lol 1 court case from Kentucky doesn't mean squat. 2 hours ago, JimmyB said: And what are your qualifications for interpreting the intention of the founders who wrote the constitution? It's called reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted August 11, 2023 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 599 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,250 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,981 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted August 11, 2023 2 hours ago, JimmyB said: Are you a lawyer? I repeat: in Stone v. Graham, 449 U.S. 39 (1980), the Supreme Court ruled that a Kentucky law that required the posting of the Ten Commandments on the wall of every public school classroom in the state violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment because the purpose of the display was essentially religious. If you think the Supreme Court's ruling was wrong, please state the legal basis of your decision. And what are your qualifications for interpreting the intention of the founders who wrote the constitution? The establishment clause concerns the federal government, not the states. It will be interesting to see what the present Supreme Court will rule on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyB Posted August 11, 2023 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,628 Content Per Day: 1.15 Reputation: 304 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/23/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted August 11, 2023 3 hours ago, jesusandliberty said: Lol 1 court case from Kentucky doesn't mean squat. It's called reading. When the Supreme Court makes a ruling it does "mean squat", so your opinion means nothing. Reading forms your personal opinion only. That doesn't mean you have the qualifications for interpreting the intention of the founders who wrote the Constitution. The Supreme Court's decision is what counts. Everybody has opinions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyB Posted August 11, 2023 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,628 Content Per Day: 1.15 Reputation: 304 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/23/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted August 11, 2023 (edited) 3 hours ago, other one said: The establishment clause concerns the federal government, not the states. It will be interesting to see what the present Supreme Court will rule on this. The Supreme Court's decision ruled that a Kentucky law that required the posting of the Ten Commandments on the wall of every public school classroom in the state violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment. That clearly shows that you are wrong about it not concerning the states. The Texas law case failed. Is there another case about this before the court or is that just wishful thinking on your part? Edited August 11, 2023 by JimmyB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyB Posted August 11, 2023 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,628 Content Per Day: 1.15 Reputation: 304 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/23/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted August 11, 2023 It doesn't matter what people think of the Supreme Court's decisions. Romans 13:1, "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except from God, and those authorities that exist have been instituted by God." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesusandliberty Posted August 11, 2023 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 34 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 157 Content Per Day: 0.57 Reputation: 53 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/08/2023 Status: Offline Share Posted August 11, 2023 26 minutes ago, JimmyB said: It doesn't matter what people think of the Supreme Court's decisions. Romans 13:1, "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except from God, and those authorities that exist have been instituted by God." That is an elementary school understanding of Romans 13. I suggest watching this https://rumble.com/v2u7dly-anatomy-of-the-church-and-state-episode-13-part-2-romans-13-with-pastor-chr.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesusandliberty Posted August 11, 2023 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 34 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 157 Content Per Day: 0.57 Reputation: 53 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/08/2023 Status: Offline Share Posted August 11, 2023 44 minutes ago, JimmyB said: When the Supreme Court makes a ruling it does "mean squat", so your opinion means nothing. Reading forms your personal opinion only. That doesn't mean you have the qualifications for interpreting the intention of the founders who wrote the Constitution. The Supreme Court's decision is what counts. Everybody has opinions! I'm curious why you defend the State over God so vehemently. Do you worship the State? It does mean squat. A judges ruling is that particular judges OPINION. Qualifications? Lmao you must be a leftist. I'm not a veterinarian but I can tell you what dogs and cats are. That is the most ignorant argument you could possibly make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyB Posted August 12, 2023 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,628 Content Per Day: 1.15 Reputation: 304 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/23/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted August 12, 2023 14 hours ago, jesusandliberty said: That is an elementary school understanding of Romans 13. I suggest watching this https://rumble.com/v2u7dly-anatomy-of-the-church-and-state-episode-13-part-2-romans-13-with-pastor-chr.html No thanks. I understand what it clearly means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyB Posted August 12, 2023 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 6 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 1,628 Content Per Day: 1.15 Reputation: 304 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/23/2020 Status: Offline Share Posted August 12, 2023 14 hours ago, jesusandliberty said: I'm curious why you defend the State over God so vehemently. Do you worship the State? It does mean squat. A judges ruling is that particular judges OPINION. Qualifications? Lmao you must be a leftist. I'm not a veterinarian but I can tell you what dogs and cats are. That is the most ignorant argument you could possibly make. That is simply your misunderstanding. Since you must resort to insults I am putting you on "ignore". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesusandliberty Posted August 14, 2023 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 34 Topics Per Day: 0.12 Content Count: 157 Content Per Day: 0.57 Reputation: 53 Days Won: 0 Joined: 08/08/2023 Status: Offline Share Posted August 14, 2023 On 8/12/2023 at 10:05 AM, JimmyB said: No thanks. I understand what it clearly means. You very clearly do not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts