Theistic Evolution

[RV_Wizard]

11 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

As you seem to be aware, "big light in the sky" is not morning. 

Since I have explained to you many, MANY times that evening and morning are created by an earth rotating and a source of light to illuminate it.  Is it that you can't understand, or are you just being deliberately simplistic?

[The Barbarian]

But God said in Genesis 2, that it was done in a day

2 minutes ago, RV_Wizard said:

Why do you think it is that you lack understanding of the Scriptures?

As you know, God said, in Genesis 2, that he created heaven and Earth in one day, including living things.

What don't you understand about that?

 

[The Barbarian]

2 minutes ago, RV_Wizard said:

Since I have explained to you many, MANY times that evening and morning are created by an earth rotating and a source of light to illuminate it. 

Nope.   If that were true, moonrise would be morning.  

 

[The Barbarian]

24 minutes ago, Sparks said:

We know from Genesis 1 that Adam was created on Day 6, so Genesis 2 is describing Day 6 in more detail.

Well, let's take a look at that assumption...

Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heaven and the earth, when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the heaven and the earth:  5 And every plant of the field before it sprung up in the earth, and every herb of the ground before it grew: for the Lord God had not rained upon the earth; and there was not a man to till the earth.

Genesis 1 says that plants were created on the 3rd day.   You still have an unresolvable contradiction, if you assume this is a literal account.

[RV_Wizard]

4 minutes ago, The Barbarian said:

As you know, God said, in Genesis 2, that he created heaven and Earth in one day, including living things.

Do you think it's possible for you to quote a verse from the Bible without misrepresenting it or outright lying about what is written?  Everything you post is out of context and completely wrong.

[Sparks]

27 minutes ago, The Barbarian said:

Well, let's take a look at that assumption...

Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heaven and the earth, when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the heaven and the earth:  5 And every plant of the field before it sprung up in the earth, and every herb of the ground before it grew: for the Lord God had not rained upon the earth; and there was not a man to till the earth.

Genesis 1 says that plants were created on the 3rd day.   You still have an unresolvable contradiction, if you assume this is a literal account.

Look at Genesis 2:1-3:

Genesis 2:1-3 states that the creation is over, and God has rested on the 7th day.  From then on we are talking about the specifics of Day 6 within Genesis 2.  God is giving details about Eden, and Adam, etc. that were not given in Genesis 1.

[Diamond]

12 hours ago, The Barbarian said:

But God said in Genesis 2, that it was done in a day.    God says:
Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heaven and the earth, when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the heaven and the earth

According to science the universe is 13.8 Billion years old and the earth is 4.54 years old. So that means day one was 9.26 Billion years.

That means day two was 4.63 B, Day three was 2.315 B, day three was 2.315 B, day four was 1.1575 B, Day five was .57885 B and day six was .28946B. If we look 289.46 million years ago was the beginning of man that we read about on day six. 

Science and the Bible agree on the time line.

[Sparks]

3 minutes ago, Diamond said:

According to science the universe is 13.8 Billion years old and the earth is 4.54 years old. So that means day one was 9.26 Billion years.

That means day two was 4.63 B, Day three was 2.315 B, day three was 2.315 B, day four was 1.1575 B, Day five was .57885 B and day six was .28946B. If we look 289.46 million years ago was the beginning of man that we read about on day six. 

Science and the Bible agree on the time line.

"The science" cannot estimate the age of the universe because you cannot really judge great distances with the methods available.  I know there are people who think you can, but I assure you they cannot. 

[The Barbarian]

12 minutes ago, Sparks said:

"The science" cannot estimate the age of the universe because you cannot really judge great distances with the methods available.  I know there are people who think you can, but I assure you they cannot. 

I think I'll go with people who actually know the data.

 

[The Barbarian]

46 minutes ago, Sparks said:

Look at Genesis 2:1-3:

Nothing there contradicts Genesis 2:4-7    Sorry.