Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  375
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  11,400
  • Content Per Day:  1.37
  • Reputation:   127
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/30/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1971

Posted

No we only need to look at Jesus as both flesh and Spirit. Those are the distinctions He speaks of.

You are doing way more than that my friend. We would all agree that Jesus had 2 natures. But you have taken the additional step of saying that His divine nature was the Father, and His Human side was the Son. That is the issue. And it is not taught in scripture. You arrive there by inference. And the passages that speak of the Jesus sitting down next to the Father, you interperet to mean figuratively, since you can't have a physal nature of Jesus minus divinity sitting next to His divinity in heaven.

I have noticed in this discussion that we respond to the scriptures you supply, but you ognore large sections of our posts and never respond when it is difficult for you. You have never responded to many of Ovedya's and my questions. Am I to assume that is because you do not have an answer for some of them, or did you just miss them?

Also, in addition to Eric's first point (Not disregarding the point he made in the second, mind you), if the Bible is speaking figurativly, what did Stephen see?

"And he said, Behold, I see the heavens opened up and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God." (Acts 7:56)

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  136
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/16/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  375
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  11,400
  • Content Per Day:  1.37
  • Reputation:   127
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/30/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1971

Posted
The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.

Hmmm...then Stephen saw a metaphore?

Also, "sit" and "stand" are locative - pronouns in the English language.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  136
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/16/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.

Hmmm...then Stephen saw a metaphore?

Also, "sit" and "stand" are locative - pronouns in the English language.

So Stephen saw a Spirit being (God) and Jesus?

Wouldn't this be polytheism or subordinationism?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.49
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.

Hmmm...then Stephen saw a metaphore?

Also, "sit" and "stand" are locative - pronouns in the English language.

So Stephen saw a Spirit being (God) and Jesus?

Wouldn't this be polytheism or subordinationism?

No. it would only be Polytheism if we said they were two separate Gods. They are the same God, two persons


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  136
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/16/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.

Hmmm...then Stephen saw a metaphore?

Also, "sit" and "stand" are locative - pronouns in the English language.

So Stephen saw a Spirit being (God) and Jesus?

Wouldn't this be polytheism or subordinationism?

No. it would only be Polytheism if we said they were two separate Gods. They are the same God, two persons

By saying "they" you are saying it whether you admit to it or not! :24:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  375
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  11,400
  • Content Per Day:  1.37
  • Reputation:   127
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/30/2002
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/14/1971

Posted

The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.

Hmmm...then Stephen saw a metaphore?

Also, "sit" and "stand" are locative - pronouns in the English language.

So Stephen saw a Spirit being (God) and Jesus?

Wouldn't this be polytheism or subordinationism?

Please don't answer a question with a question. I am challenging your assertion that the term "right hand of God" is merely a metaphor.

Is Jesus God or not?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.49
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.

Hmmm...then Stephen saw a metaphore?

Also, "sit" and "stand" are locative - pronouns in the English language.

So Stephen saw a Spirit being (God) and Jesus?

Wouldn't this be polytheism or subordinationism?

No. it would only be Polytheism if we said they were two separate Gods. They are the same God, two persons

By saying "they" you are saying it whether you admit to it or not! :24:

No chad, I am not. We have answered all your questions. Would you show us the same consideration by answering ours rather than just firing back question after question?


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  136
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/16/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.

Hmmm...then Stephen saw a metaphore?

Also, "sit" and "stand" are locative - pronouns in the English language.

So Stephen saw a Spirit being (God) and Jesus?

Wouldn't this be polytheism or subordinationism?

Please don't answer a question with a question. I am challenging your assertion that the term "right hand of God" is merely a metaphor.

Is Jesus God or not?

Yes, Jesus is God the Father manifest in flesh. He is both fully God and fully man. This has been my stance since the beginning. And by the way, I believe I have answered more of your questions than you have of mine. You are saying over and over again that Stephen saw two persons in heaven and the third person was inside him. So you are saying there was another person inside of Stephen and that when heaven opened up, Stephen saw Jesus as He was on earth and Stephen saw God the Spirit. How come Stephen is the only man in the history of the world who can see a spirit. By definition a spirit is invisible!

I feel like I am in a trinity nightmare here. I answer your questions and they are not good enough. I ask questions and get another question or an answer that isn't good enough. On and on we go. :24:


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  136
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/16/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The term at the right hand of God points to his exalted position he now is active on. There is numerous things that need to be considered to understand this phrase. The phrase right hand is a metaphor, God exercises his authority by his right hand.

Hmmm...then Stephen saw a metaphore?

Also, "sit" and "stand" are locative - pronouns in the English language.

So Stephen saw a Spirit being (God) and Jesus?

Wouldn't this be polytheism or subordinationism?

No. it would only be Polytheism if we said they were two separate Gods. They are the same God, two persons

By saying "they" you are saying it whether you admit to it or not! :24:

No chad, I am not. We have answered all your questions. Would you show us the same consideration by answering ours rather than just firing back question after question?

What is your question?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...