Bible Versions Poll

[Guest Shawneeda]

Please note that Wescott & Hort did not even believe in Jesus Christ.

[Guest Jipsah]

I also don't say that anyone that doesn't read King James Version of the Bible is not saved.

[johnjackofmn]

If I want to really confuse someone, I read from the KJV. If I want to be clear and consice, I read from one of the modern versions, like the NIV, the NLT, or the New Century.

[Enoch&Elijah]

WHAT IN THE WORLD KIND OF CHANGE IS THIS???

NIV

Isaiah 14

12 How you have fallen from heaven,

O >>>>>(MORNING STAR)<<<<<, son of the dawn!

You have been cast down to the earth,

you who once laid low the nations!

13 You said in your heart,

"I will ascend to heaven;

I will raise my throne

above the stars of God;

I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly,

on the utmost heights of the sacred mountain. [1]

Morning Star??????  Who is this?????

Revelation 22:16

"I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright >>>>>>(Morning Star)."<<<<<<<<,

Is Jesus fallen from Heaven????? Jesus says he is the Morning Star.

or is it???????

kjv

Isaiah 14

12   How art thou fallen from heaven, >>>>>>(O Lucifer, son of the morning!)<<<<<<<<, how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

13   For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:

or is the NIV taking down Christ the saviour???

according to the kjv Lucifer is (the son of the morning).

Revelation 22:16

 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and >>>>>>(morning star.)<<<<<<<<

The KJV says that Jesus is the Morning Star

A BIG difference???

NIV-Jesus Fallen from heaven=Morning Star

KJV-Lucifer is Fallen from heaven=son of the morning

     Jesus Christ Our Saviour=Morning Star

     

Is Wescott and Hort False Teachers I begin to Wonder if they are???????

:lightbulb:  :lightbulb:  :lightbulb:  :lightbulb:  :lightbulb:  :lightbulb:  :lightbulb:

[kanaka]

Enoch&Elijah wrote:

<< And Revelation 22:18 and 19 and in other places in the Bible God tells us Not to add or subtract From his Word.  >>

Then the KJV and NKJV and the Textus Receptus are bad, because they have a lot of versed ADDED to the Word that were not originally written by the apostles.

[kanaka]

hereami wrote:

<<  Why do some people find it necessary to attack the KJV Bible?

I give people information in regards to new 'versions' so they can make an informed choice, but do not call them names. >>

KJV Onlyism is attacked, not the KJV.  If you won't acknowledge the difference between the KJV on the one hand, and KJV Onlyism, then you are being argumentive and unreasonable.

The most attacked version is the NIV.  The site in question here does not "attack the KJV," but only attackes "KJV Onlyism," which is a harmful cult, that divides the people of God.

KJV Onlyists are divisive, proud, unteachabole, carnal, and have tongues set on fire of hell.

My Bible Versions Poll demonstrates how stubborn KJV Onlyists are.  Given a choice in the poll between the 1611 "He Bible" and the 1611 "She Bible," they vote for the misprint edition, and not the corrected edition.  You see, the first edition, the "He Bible," had a misprint in Ruth 3:15 that erroneously said, "and he went into the city."  So later in 1611 they came out with the so-called "She Bible," which corrected the error in Ruth 3:15.  But King James Onlyists are so quick to react without thinking, that they vote for the "He Bible."  They really ought to be humbled and embarrassed, but instead they attack this Bible Versions Poll instead.

[kanaka]

Shawneeda wrote:

<< Only the KJV says "washed in the blood", the others, I am told, do not say that.

[kanaka]

Jacob51 wrote:

<<  I thought there was olny one KJV bible,whats that other non sense? >>

Non sense?  There were many editions and revisions of the KJV.  How is that nonsense?  It is just historical truth.  Who told you there was only one KJV Bible?

[kanaka]

RCruise wrote:

<< In short, all texts can be traced back to two sources:

KJV is from the "Masoretic Text" = Old Test.

[kanaka]

Shawneeda wrote:

<<  Please note that Wescott & Hort did not even believe in Jesus Christ.