Jump to content
IGNORED

It's Not About Israel


Guest shiloh357

Recommended Posts

Guest shiloh357
Rather than get upset, why not try and prove anything I've said as being wrong. I've been polite yet factual. You make an accusation of legalism yet have not backed it up. And, is this not a forum where by we can discuss view pionts.? I sence an unhealthy attitude in your reply. If I"m wrong my appoligise, how about one in return.

Yeah, stafy my last response was not to you, but was being made in reference the article by tmrflies. You have not presented any meaningful facts, to disprove. All you have done is gripe. When you provide something of intellectual substance, then perhaps a meaningful debate can ensue.

Second: why didn't you not open with a statement that this was someone elses report, and since that is now the know case, you should have validated the report, by giving some background credentials as to who and where Mr Harris is coming from.
Why should I present any background on the author. I stated that it was a Jerusalem Post report and that Mr. Harris wrote it. Here is something for you to think about... you have a computer!! You can google him for yourself and learn all you want about him. I am sure he has other articles to read and and bio with his background info on it. Do your own research.

While we are talking about backgrounds, who are you and what are YOUR credentials, and why should we listen to you??? Why don't we apply your standard to you?? Why is your opinion valuable, and what professional credentials do you possess that make it valuable???

At the moment all we have is a myistery report with no benchmark as to what the author, was in fact on about.
A "mystery report?" What makes it a "mystery report?" It was published in the Jerusalem Post, which is an internationally read news source in good standing in may places all over the planet. This was not written in a dark corner. The same article has been reprinted in other well-read news sources. You are being really over-dramatic.

In esence we are just disccussing your personal interpretation of a mystery report and when someone llike me acctually pionts out the faults in the report, you get upset and try to kick then out of the post.
No, actually we have not been discussing my interpretation. We have been discussing your baseless and fairly ridiculous condemnation of the article. Your big gripe is that the article does not mention God. All we have been addressing is your remarks. We have not really gotten around to discussing the substance of the article at all.

I'm happy, friendly and not the sort of person to get upset, just asking a few penertrating questions that are completely valid.
I do not see your questions as "penetrating." While they might be "valid," they have absolutely NOTHING to do with the material presented in the article.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  129
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/29/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Rather than get upset, why not try and prove anything I've said as being wrong. I've been polite yet factual. You make an accusation of legalism yet have not backed it up. And, is this not a forum where by we can discuss view pionts.? I sence an unhealthy attitude in your reply. If I"m wrong my appoligise, how about one in return.

Yeah, stafy my last response was not to you, but was being made in reference the article by tmrflies. You have not presented any meaningful facts, to disprove. All you have done is gripe. When you provide something of intellectual substance, then perhaps a meaningful debate can ensue.

Second: why didn't you not open with a statement that this was someone elses report, and since that is now the know case, you should have validated the report, by giving some background credentials as to who and where Mr Harris is coming from.
Why should I present any background on the author. I stated that it was a Jerusalem Post report and that Mr. Harris wrote it. Here is something for you to think about... you have a computer!! You can google him for yourself and learn all you want about him. I am sure he has other articles to read and and bio with his background info on it. Do your own research.

While we are talking about backgrounds, who are you and what are YOUR credentials, and why should we listen to you??? Why don't we apply your standard to you?? Why is your opinion valuable, and what professional credentials do you possess that make it valuable???

At the moment all we have is a myistery report with no benchmark as to what the author, was in fact on about.
A "mystery report?" What makes it a "mystery report?" It was published in the Jerusalem Post, which is an internationally read news source in good standing in may places all over the planet. This was not written in a dark corner. The same article has been reprinted in other well-read news sources. You are being really over-dramatic.

In esence we are just disccussing your personal interpretation of a mystery report and when someone llike me acctually pionts out the faults in the report, you get upset and try to kick then out of the post.
No, actually we have not been discussing my interpretation. We have been discussing your baseless and fairly ridiculous condemnation of the article. Your big gripe is that the article does not mention God. All we have been addressing is your remarks. We have not really gotten around to discussing the substance of the article at all.

I'm happy, friendly and not the sort of person to get upset, just asking a few penertrating questions that are completely valid.
I do not see your questions as "penetrating." While they might be "valid," they have absolutely NOTHING to do with the material presented in the article.

WELL SOMEONE DID SAY DON'T COME BACK UNTIL YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY AND THAT EQUATES TO KICKING SOMEONE OFF THE POST. Sorry the capitals are a mistake,

I have made my piont. what didn't you get. If there is no god and devil there wouldn't be any oppression.

And I will ask for your forgiveness I did read the head line as is evident in my last reply, but got a little off track due to your last responce.

so again I am very sorry and are happy that you all stood your ground and corrected me, as I said before there is nothing wrong with being wrong as long as we learn from our mistakes so in future to Shiloh357 well done. will pay my respects to your diligence on this matter. So I'm still gripping, it's not that it doesn't mention God, but that if you leave god out there is no piont to answering the question as the answer involves God.

Now if you wish have one last pick at this and then finish with what is the piont to the posts material and how can we have an answer that doesn't involve god.

I've just checked Mr harris's jerusalim post site and I think it mild to say he is coming from a non chiratian view piont. Which would support everything i"ve said. He is a journelist writting from a secular position for a secualr audiance on a secular newspaper and although he may or may not have a christain background does not change the audiance he was writting for. so you have brought a secular report onto worthy boards on now wish to discuss its validitivity.

I don't see the piont in it. happy sailing!

Edited by stafy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shiloh357
WELL SOMEONE DID SAY DON'T COME BACK UNTIL YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY AND THAT EQUATES TO KICKING SOMEONE OFF THE POST.
I said come back when you have something worthwhile to say. I did not kick you off the thread. The point is that you are hijacking the thread to talk about something that is not material to the Opening Post. You are tyring to take the discussion a different direction, instead of posting about the material presented. You need to lose the persecution complex.

I have made my piont. what didn't you get. If there is no god and devil there wouldn't be any oppression.
Yeah, if there were no God, there would be no universe. I really don't see the point to you are trying to make, as it has nothing to do with the article.

So I'm still gripping, it's not that it doesn't mention God, but that if you leave god out there is no piont to answering the question as the answer involves God.

Now if you wish have one last pick at this and then finish with what is the piont to the posts material and how can we have an answer that doesn't involve god

The article is not presenting an "answer" or solution. The article is not eliminating God from the issue at all. It is simply stating that the world has bought into the lie that all of the problems in the Middleeast would cease to exist if Israel and the Palestinians were living in peace.

My problem with your responses is that you jump on this thread and assume that we have just eliminated God from the solution, as if THIS were the ONLY article posted in the forum on the subject. We have posted many articles here that affirm that God alone is the answer to the peace needed in the Middleeast. Please stop jumping to conclusions and mouthing off with baseless assumptions about people you dont know, namely us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  129
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/29/2006
  • Status:  Offline

WELL SOMEONE DID SAY DON'T COME BACK UNTIL YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY AND THAT EQUATES TO KICKING SOMEONE OFF THE POST.
I said come back when you have something worthwhile to say. I did not kick you off the thread. The point is that you are hijacking the thread to talk about something that is not material to the Opening Post. You are tyring to take the discussion a different direction, instead of posting about the material presented. You need to lose the persecution complex.

I have made my piont. what didn't you get. If there is no god and devil there wouldn't be any oppression.
Yeah, if there were no God, there would be no universe. I really don't see the point to you are trying to make, as it has nothing to do with the article.

So I'm still gripping, it's not that it doesn't mention God, but that if you leave god out there is no piont to answering the question as the answer involves God.

Now if you wish have one last pick at this and then finish with what is the piont to the posts material and how can we have an answer that doesn't involve god

The article is not presenting an "answer" or solution. The article is not eliminating God from the issue at all. It is simply stating that the world has bought into the lie that all of the problems in the Middleeast would cease to exist if Israel and the Palestinians were living in peace.

My problem with your responses is that you jump on this thread and assume that we have just eliminated God from the solution, as if THIS were the ONLY article posted in the forum on the subject. We have posted many articles here that affirm that God alone is the answer to the peace needed in the Middleeast. Please stop jumping to conclusions and mouthing off with baseless assumptions about people you dont know, namely us.

Thank you, your final paragraph confirms what i"ve said all along, what took you so long to come around. Thats the only piont I was making from the begining. I don't know why you made such a big fush over nothing. And you don't have to repsond, to what I replied, you can just ignore it you know. well, that was all I was wanting to say, so konw I'll leave you to your post. You know if you had just written that one paragraph at the begining we wouldn't have needed 5 replies to get here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest shiloh357
Thank you, your final paragraph confirms what i"ve said all along, what took you so long to come around. Thats the only piont I was making from the begining. I don't know why you made such a big fush over nothing. And you don't have to repsond, to what I replied, you can just ignore it you know. well, that was all I was wanting to say, so konw I'll leave you to your post. You know if you had just written that one paragraph at the begining we wouldn't have needed 5 replies to get here.
No, you were the one making a fuss over nothing. Actually the point was made before but you ignored it and kept going, which brought us here. Oh well, whatever....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 1 reply
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 231 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...