Jump to content
IGNORED

14-year-old Texas girl gets 7 years in prison for shoving hall monitor


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  135
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,537
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   157
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  04/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/29/1956

Posted
no, but i thought about sending one of my kids there! :rolleyes:

seriously... juvie may be full of children who have committed crimes, some of them vicious crimes, some of them nonviolent crimes, but it is NOT the same as being in a prison full of ADULT offenders.

this child committed a crime. i think 7 years is excessive. but i don't think sending her to juvie was excessive at all.

If you haven't had a child in juvie, you don't know that. The only difference between them and their adult counterparts is age, nothing more. You send a child thats acting up, and already headed down the wrong path to juvie, and they LEARN, to be the victim, and then as they get older to make the younger or weaker ones their victmins. 7 years in that enviroment almost promises to turn out a 21 year old, that is MUCH older, wiser (street wise that is) and probably more evil, than when she went in. I have no problem with her being punished, she deserves to be, and maybe a six months or so would scare her straight, but 7 years will make her even more of what she already is.

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest LadyC
Posted

my point is that the criminals in juvie are ALL KIDS. you are (intentionally or UNintentionally) giving people the impression that this kid, who IS A CRIMINAL, is unfairly being sentenced to doing hard time with adult criminals.

the kid committed a crime.

by the way, are you just intentionally avoiding answering the questions that i asked directly of you?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  135
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,537
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   157
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  04/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/29/1956

Posted
my point is that the criminals in juvie are ALL KIDS. you are (intentionally or UNintentionally) giving people the impression that this kid, who IS A CRIMINAL, is unfairly being sentenced to doing hard time with adult criminals.

the kid committed a crime.

by the way, are you just intentionally avoiding answering the questions that i asked directly of you?

No I'm not I intentionally said JUVIE every time I answered you. What question evidently I missed it?

Guest LadyC
Posted
my point is that the criminals in juvie are ALL KIDS. you are (intentionally or UNintentionally) giving people the impression that this kid, who IS A CRIMINAL, is unfairly being sentenced to doing hard time with adult criminals.

the kid committed a crime.

by the way, are you just intentionally avoiding answering the questions that i asked directly of you?

No I'm not I intentionally said JUVIE every time I answered you. What question evidently I missed it?

i'm reposting the entire post that i made.

silentprayer, i have to ask...

if an adult shoved a cop, or a bailiff, or any other public official, would you consider it to be 'just a shove' or would you consider it to be an assault?

if a husband in a drunken rage shoved his wife, would you consider it just a push, or an assault?

what the girl did was a criminal act, and it was certainly not the first time she'd been a disciplinary problem at the school.

it could be that the JUDGE was a racist. but i don't know that to be a fact. it's a possibility. if he was the same judge that gave the girl probation for burning her house down, then it certainly smells like a rat.... and i've already said that the judge who gave the girl probation for arson wasn't any more worthy of sitting on the bench than a rat.

but... she was not put in JAIL. she was put in JUVIE. please recognize that saying 'jail' or 'prison' implies something far more extreme than it is and paints a picture that makes public perception to be far worse than what is. the girl is not in jail with a bunch of adult offenders.

but that article paints the entire town, and worse, the entire state, as being racist in the judicial system, and that is a load of crap.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  135
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,537
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   157
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  04/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/29/1956

Posted
silentprayer, i have to ask...

if an adult shoved a cop, or a bailiff, or any other public official, would you consider it to be 'just a shove' or would you consider it to be an assault?

if a husband in a drunken rage shoved his wife, would you consider it just a push, or an assault?

what the girl did was a criminal act, and it was certainly not the first time she'd been a disciplinary problem at the school.

it could be that the JUDGE was a racist. but i don't know that to be a fact. it's a possibility. if he was the same judge that gave the girl probation for burning her house down, then it certainly smells like a rat.... and i've already said that the judge who gave the girl probation for arson wasn't any more worthy of sitting on the bench than a rat.

but... she was not put in JAIL. she was put in JUVIE. please recognize that saying 'jail' or 'prison' implies something far more extreme than it is and paints a picture that makes public perception to be far worse than what is. the girl is not in jail with a bunch of adult offenders.

but that article paints the entire town, and worse, the entire state, as being racist in the judicial system, and that is a load of crap.

Are all of these what your talking about???

1) yes its and assult but still not worthy of 7 years in jail

2) yes its and assult but still not worthy of 7 years in jail

and you can call it juvie all you want, its still JAIL

Guest LadyC
Posted

ok, so silentprayer, are we in agreement that the LENGTH of the sentence was extreme in our opinions, but that the girl committed a CRIME deserving of incarceration for a lesser time?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  135
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,537
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   157
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  04/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/29/1956

Posted
ok, so silentprayer, are we in agreement that the LENGTH of the sentence was extreme in our opinions, but that the girl committed a CRIME deserving of incarceration for a lesser time?

I said that, in my post #21.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  135
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,537
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   157
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  04/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/29/1956

Posted
She was a punk kid...raised by a punk mom...with no RESPECT for authority. I don't care WHO she is, or what she looks like. The ONLY racism in this story is a bunch of people of one race dressing up like Black Panthers and marching in front of the courthouse to protest a judge from another race...who apparently wasn't raised to be a public nuisance and made something of his life.

If my kids EVER assault somebody they better hope for jail time. Of course, my kids are raised to respect people and to listen to authority. This kid attacked a man for telling her she couldn't enter the school early...I don't feel one IOTA of pitty for her.

I sincerely hope none of your children ever get into trouble. You can raise them all you want, sometimes that doesn't stop them from doing things you would never want them to do, and you know what, even if you agree with the courts, you still love them.

Guest LadyC
Posted
ok, so silentprayer, are we in agreement that the LENGTH of the sentence was extreme in our opinions, but that the girl committed a CRIME deserving of incarceration for a lesser time?

I said that, in my post #21.

can we also agree that using the term "jail" conjures up images in most people's minds that the girl was locked up with adults rather than in a "jail for youth offenders" otherwise known as juvie hall? that is my objection to the term jail. yes, i realize that juvie is a "jail", but it is not the same "jail" as what is commonly associated with a regular jail. people are jumping to the incorrect conclusion that she is locked up with adult offenders.

Guest Biblicist
Posted
I'd hate to live in your household, Biblicist. Sixteen lashes for not doing the dishes, probably. And there would be no TV. :) (Judging from the random "liberal media" comment.)

:24: I find this comment so funny. You don't believe that crimes should be punished?

There are plenty of things on TV that have nothing to do with the Liberal Media.

I hate to say it, but if that girl was a rich white girl, she would have gotten away with it.

She absolutly would have because rich people can afford lawyers who can get them off for the worst crimes. Her skin color does not matter though, again. Hello! OJ Simson!

We do not know all the details in this case, only what the Liberal Media has reported, notice how the NAACP has jumped in there! Did this girl have a record of violence? She may have, and been before this judge before. We have no idea what her previous life or record looks like. She may be a repeat offender.

All that said, I do think that 7 years in juvie is too much for a push. The punishment should fit the crime. The father of my son's friend, last year, was constantly threatening to send his son to Juvie. It was heartbreaking to hear the way he talked about it as if it was the corner of the room, instead of something more serious.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 14 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...