Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  448
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/10/1981

Posted
Why should it matter how often it occurs? The fact is, it does occur. I dealt with students that were essentially warm bodies in a wheelchair. They had to be fed, have their diapers changed, etc. If they fell out of the wheelchair, they would never show any signs of pain. Likewise, they never showed emotion.

You're saying they aren't human or worthy of life? Again, how does this make you any better than a Nazi?

The people you are describing seem to be quite impaired mentally but nothing in your description indicates that they do not have desires.

That's a pathetic argument. Of course we can use plants - we can use any animals for our purposes so long as it is not abusive. This is why I'm against cruelty to animals, but also against excessive pollution.

Remember, you said that animals have some rights because they are creatures of God. If you are consistent then you must also hold that anything else that is created by God, including inanimate objects, deserves at least some moral rights. I'm trying to show the absurdity of using that line of thinking regarding morality.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.15
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
The people you are describing seem to be quite impaired mentally but nothing in your description indicates that they do not have desires.

There is no way to know. However, it is highly improbably that they do...generally there is never any registering of cognitive thought occurring within. Your ideology says it's okay to kill them. How are you not following Nazi ideology?

Remember, you said that animals have some rights because they are creatures of God. If you are consistent then you must also hold that anything else that is created by God, including inanimate objects, deserves at least some moral rights. I'm trying to show the absurdity of using that line of thinking regarding morality.

Oh, so now I have to be stuck to a limited definition and can't elaborate?

Regardless, yes, all things on this earth that have been created by God deserve some moral rights. Needless deforestation is immoral according to the Bible. I also said they were never to be held to the same level as humans in morality - thus we can kill them for food, etc...we just cannot be cruel, pollute, etc. What's your point?


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  448
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/10/1981

Posted
There is no way to know. However, it is highly improbably that they do...generally there is never any registering of cognitive thought occurring within. Your ideology says it's okay to kill them. How are you not following Nazi ideology?

I can't comment since you have not described the disease or illness you are alluding to. All I can say is that I know the Nazis killed those who I think were deserving of moral consideration.

Regardless, yes, all things on this earth that have been created by God deserve some moral rights. Needless deforestation is immoral according to the Bible. I also said they were never to be held to the same level as humans in morality - thus we can kill them for food, etc...we just cannot be cruel, pollute, etc. What's your point?

So you think, for example, that a rock is deserving of moral rights because it was created? If so, you're consistent but I don't think many will agree with your line of thinking. If not, then elaboration is needed.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.15
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
I can't comment since you have not described the disease or illness you are alluding to.

And you've yet to offer a reasonable defense for your beliefs.

So the only belief difference between you and a Nazi is they took a bit further than you would? Wow...

So you think, for example, that a rock is deserving of moral rights because it was created? If so, you're consistent but I don't think many will agree with your line of thinking. If not, then elaboration is needed.

To a certain extent, yes. If there were a way to destroy rocks excessively, to where they were endangered, then yes, we would need to take it into moral consideration. The problem, of course, is this is impossible. ;)


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  448
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/10/1981

Posted
And you've yet to offer a reasonable defense for your beliefs.

I'm willing to defend them if you come up with a specific disease or illness.

So the only belief difference between you and a Nazi is they took a bit further than you would? Wow...

There are numerous differences between the Nazis and I. Your insinuations are unproductive. Come up with specific questions and I can discuss them.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.15
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
And you've yet to offer a reasonable defense for your beliefs.

I'm willing to defend them if you come up with a specific disease or illness.

So the only belief difference between you and a Nazi is they took a bit further than you would? Wow...

There are numerous differences between the Nazis and I. Your insinuations are unproductive. Come up with specific questions and I can discuss them.

Bottom line after this - you ethically and philosophically can't support your position. ;)


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,227
  • Content Per Day:  0.17
  • Reputation:   6
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/10/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/19/1964

Posted
What is the cut off date?

That is a question for scientists to answer: when does a fetus gain desires?

Is it still undeserving of moral consideration at 9 months if it is still in the womb?

I'm sure the brain and central nervous system are developed before birth.

What about 5 months?

I've heard numbers around 20-25 weeks so that is probably in the ball park.

Ballpark? is "close enough" ok when you might be killing a human being. How can we know what day specifically for each non born human. If they have desire and can feel pain one day before 20 weeks and you kill them are you less responsible. Are they any less dead. What magically changed in one day. Who gets to decide when you are human and when you are not?

God Bless,

Kansas Dad


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  448
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/10/1981

Posted
Ballpark? is "close enough" ok when you might be killing a human being. How can we know what day specifically for each non born human. If they have desire and can feel pain one day before 20 weeks and you kill them are you less responsible. Are they any less dead. What magically changed in one day. Who gets to decide when you are human and when you are not?

You can error on the side of caution. When it comes to embryos there is really no doubt that they cannot feel pain.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  19
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,227
  • Content Per Day:  0.17
  • Reputation:   6
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/10/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/19/1964

Posted
Ballpark? is "close enough" ok when you might be killing a human being. How can we know what day specifically for each non born human. If they have desire and can feel pain one day before 20 weeks and you kill them are you less responsible. Are they any less dead. What magically changed in one day. Who gets to decide when you are human and when you are not?

You can error on the side of caution. When it comes to embryos there is really no doubt that they cannot feel pain.

Tell me how do we error on the side of caution, one day, one week, one month? And who gets to decide that feeling pain is a prerequisite for being human?


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  400
  • Content Per Day:  0.06
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/02/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Dope me up on Codine and stab me in the face. I won't feel a thing.

It still does not give you the right to stab me.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...