Who me

An anti God faith based idea which cannot be falsified.

No he referred to genesis in the context of marriage. He made the point that man has always existed. " at the begining the Creator made them male and female." Matt 19:4 niv. If you look at other translation like the King James it says from the beginning of creation he made them. Jesus is backing a literal understanding of the creation account.

Write your next research paper from a yec scientist perspective and see how open minded and evidence bases their judgement is. I will remind you that the Royal society had an education office who made the grave error of public5 saying that children who believed in creation should be reasoned with. The uproar over this radical concept cost him his job.

There several types of proof, it is not only mathematical proof that exists. Example, you prove it is safe to overtake a car or turn across a busy junction based on what you can see and judge. Courts want to prove what is reasonable to determine the guilt or innocence of an accused person.

We will only be at risk if the devil attempts to preempt Jesus's 2nd coming, when every eye will see him. Any other supernatural manifestation of God/Jesus is fake.

Science does not recognise the non material. The supernatural does not exist! That said, they have to work with the immaterial numbers,maths, logic/reasoning and morality. As to where heaven and hell physically is? They are not physical places, God is Spirit and heaven is where ever God is and he'll is that small spiritual place where God's presence is not. Heaven become physical when the new heaven and a new earth is made.

How about quoting the questions and some responses to them.

There are practical reasons for using a few people to lead services. Two simple reasons are the inability of many people to publicly speak clearly and the unwi.lingness of people to get up in front of people. We regularly have times of sharing, testimony open prayer, very few people will speak and some that do are so incoherent they are unintelligible,. Having people who are able to prepare and deliver a service is a great blessing. Having people who delight in playing music leading the singing is another blessing. Both groups need the humility to recognise they are servi5 God and the congregation, not them selves. Talk to your minister, preachers and musicians, how can you encourage, support and pray for them.

Yet scientist say the opposite. Evolutionist and atheists say that science has proved there is no God. Richard Dawkins is one example of a scientist who claims this. So as science cannot measure, observe or experiment on the cause of the b3gining of the universe. What caused it? Please remember Jesus supports a 6 day creation, he gives n9 support to evolution, so what cause every5hing 5o happen.

Basically we Worship in Spir and in Truth. What we do, stand, kneel, wave arms, how we sing or don't sing, chant or process around isn't the worship but is an aid that helps us worship. Anointing with oil was a beauty aid, to sooth sores or as a sign that one was special or being prayed for. The oil was never anything other than a sign. That is the case today.

What evidence would you accept? Have you tried asking g why scientific journals like,e scientific America don't publish article discussing creation? Would you accept the claims of yes scientists? Got it in one. It is the bias I side the scientists and in the science establishment that does not recognise the possibility of the supernatural of a creator or of creation. Result evolution is the only possibilitity.

While Ken Ham is not a scientist he is supported by scientists who understand the technical details of science. A public debate and the Ken Ham debate was public a d videod , that showed the strength of the scientific claim for evolution would have done AIG and the other yec organisations tremendous harm and loss of credibility. Please remember the debate argument is not just with Ken Ham, but the challenge has been made that yec will debate any scientist on any subject with a recognised scientist I that discipline. The challenge was not accepted. Yes you are right about childish behaviour , but do you recognise that it applies to both sides of the argument.

Debates have many purposes, one is to demonstrate that ones ideas are right and that the oppositions are wrong. A better method than the current method of declaring only evolution can be considered and to censor all other ideas. I've read the two links you supplied and they were empty of the ' gobs and gobs of evidence'. If evolution was so well supported by evidence the failure to show this in the Ken Ham debate is very questionable, why didn't they publicly show he was wrong? Or it is because the evidence is just not there! Yes he like many people accept proved scientific ideas while rejecting unproven ideas like evolution.

This is often claimed, that 5here is " gobs and gobs of evidence for evolution!" Yet evolutionist repeated decline to debate and wipe the floor with the yec debater with this copious evidence. Example the Ken Ham debate. The usual get out is, they Don want to publice creationism, which is another way of saying that there isn't gobs and gobs of evidence.

Two responses to that. 1. Only God is sinless, so only God can pay the penalty for our sins. 2. The Mormons will preach you must be born again etc, yet they don't believe that Jesus is the second person of the trinity, merely that he is the offspring of God and his wife. Are you prepared to be in union with them? Doctrine do3s matter.

Sorry I miss understood your earlier reply.y assuming g you were making that claim. Basic law of biogenesis is that life only comes from life. That is demonstratable, it also is demonstratable that life follows the pattern set by genetics. We do not see fish developing legs or flightless creatures developing wings. Evolution is a faith, that believes without evidence that life comes from nonlife and that living things can developed abilities that non of their ancestors had.

Please supply documented evidence where information ' just arose '. Yes it is a vital, even essential part of evolution, but it is a faith based belief, not an evidence based belief.

Sorry you are greatlu mistaken. This isnot evolution at work, but natural selection. If anything it is devolution as genetic information is being lost.

It seeks to e4xplain and does explain how a population can change according to the range of genetic information in that population. But it cannot explain how new genetic information can arise. There are local population on islands of flightless insects, or having very poor flying ability, because strong winds have blown able flyers off the island and out to sea. That local population cannot gain or develop the ability to be good long distant fliers now they have lost that ability. It can only be re introduced by the arrival of insects with that ability, assuming they can live long enough on that island! This is the failure of evolution and why it is a lie when it is taught that information can just arise.

God's promises are always for our good, they are also always conditional and it those who chaff at the conditions who see Gods promises as being negative.

App.y that to the lie that is evolution. It has been around for over a hundred years and despite having no evidence is still going strong.

Why did she marry you if she thinks so little of you? If she doesn't support you why is she there, tell her to get on side or to get out.

Natural selection is a demonstrable process, while the benefits of mutation and genetic drift are not so easily proved.

Actually God did protect Job, yes he permitted satan to harm Job and his family, but that was only within the limits God set. David was also protected, not from the consequences of his actions, but God enabled him to keep his throne. The Jews, children etc, God is not a sugar daddy enabling us to live how we like with no consequences to our actions. We are moral beings and if we persecute others for what ever reason we will face the consequences, either legal action in this life or Gods justice in the next. Ultimately God wants us in a relationship with him, while we also live in a world and society that rejects every restraint and moral obligation from God. Paul described todays world well when he said, 'they will call evil good and good evil'. we can only expect things to become worse as we seek to live to honour God and in doing so are salt and light in a decaying dark world.

Evolution is based on the assumption that progress is through random change. Science, that is physics, chemistry and biology is based on the knowledge that God created and sustains all THINGS. How do you know that your computer will work tomorrow, or that reason will work tomorrow as it has today. If random change is possible can you supply a reason why it won’t happen? Only a Christian world view can do this.