Slug1

Yes, I always have a second mag on my "civvy" belt while I'm out and about. On a range, I have a double mag holder on my range belt.

Have you tried installing a slide/rack assist to any of your Glocks?

I carry a 43x on a daily basis. Unfortunately, I am in a state that is anti-gun and due to state law, I cannot carry more than 10 in the mag. So, while I'd love to branch out to higher capacity pistols, this 43x is my go to.

As has been mentioned, no one world government, no one leader of that one world government, no religious leader teaching the one world leader is God (with supernatural sign/wonders to emphasize teaching), no treaty with Israel (world peace), no rebuilt temple, the one world government leader has not broke that treaty by desecrating the temple and declaring himself "God", the MoB follows that breaking of the treaty/desecration/proclamation of godhood. So, a shot is not the MoB.

Could the Lord be prompting you to intercede for mankind who is sinful, plead that mankind turn to Jesus for redemption? Asking because it's looking more and more like end times is poised to begin.

I would like to point out that in your previous post, you stated that if God hadn't called out, then there would have been no fear. Your words were: However, as you agree, they "heard" God before He called out to them. Their "fear" was due to knowing God was in the garden, they "acknowledged" Him and this was the reason for their fear. The fear, before He called out, led them to "hide" themselves before He called out.

Which happened first? They heard God, or He called out?

We are viewing "apostasy" in action.

Hooah, and due to "grace" sought after him and still allowed Adam to face Him, after the fall.

Amen! When I was hiding my personal sexual immorality many years ago, I did experience what I refer to as my "Nathan" moment. God had sent a prophet and this prophet spoke to me and called out the sin (plus alot more) and this broke me to the point of true repentance. I was hearing the Holy Spirit's conviction, KNEW I was sinning against God but I didn't heed the conviction. God knew what I needed to experience/hear.

Hooah, good. I now need to understand why you raised the issue of condemnation of homosexuality as distinct from other sin? Meaning, most sins are IDed by name (distinctly), at times in the Scriptures and in others, such sin is not IDed by name (not distinct), but instead is generalized. My reference in raising OT and NT references is for the point of understanding examples of "named" sins. That when in the NT, when sin is generalized such as by the use of "sexual immorality," we can find detailed examples elsewhere in the Scriptures. Makes what case? I understand that no matter WHAT sin a person has done, or is doing, Grace allows such a person bound by such sin to be able to turn away from the sin (any sin) and repent in their turning toward Christ in belief. He will forgive them and if He was physically face to face with them, after redeeming them, He'd say... sin no more.

Shall I, or can I conclude from your response that sexual relations between two women or two men, is not sexual immorality?

Will lift you in prayer this day. Such testimony puts perspective to what Jesus says: Matthew 10:34 “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; 36 and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’ 37 He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. 38 And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. 39 He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it.

Hooah! I'm still trying to figure out how this thread spun into basically a "we aren't under the Law" anymore when sin is IDed throughout the Scriptures and the power it has and the death it has, is the same for both OT and NT times

Hmmm, you say I am speaking two different words and speaking two different languages. Shall I or can I conclude from your post, that sexual relation between two women or two men, is not sexual immorality?