toocoolblue

This is a tough question to answer for fear of offending people. There is (in my opinion), a false teaching call Replacement Theology. In this teaching, Jews have been replaced as God's chosen people. I don't know where in scripture people could have possibly gotten this idea. But many do embrace this notion. Personally, I do not believe that the Jews ever have been or could possibly be replaced. However, they have had their understanding "darkened" as Jewish scripture puts it. Isaiah 6:9-10, Isaiah 29:10-11, Isaiah 44:18 Sadly, most people who identify themselves as Jewish today, are in reality Atheist. They don't simply reject Christ, they reject any form of God. Including the God that is spoken of in the Synagogue. They see, but cannot see. Hear, but cannot hear. Just as Jewish...not Christian..Jewish scripture says. Everything about the Messiah - Who, What, When, Where, Why and How - is clearly written in Jewish scripture. Yet, thousands of years have passed without them being able to see this or hear this. But things are changing. This generation has probably seen more Jews come to Christ than in the last 2,000 years combined. Amazing things are happening. Why people aren't talking about it, is beyond me.

Are there any verses that tell you to stop following them? I don't know a single commandment that wouldn't be followed by doing as Jesus said. Namely, worship God with all your heart and treat others as you want to be treated. Before Jesus, following the commandments was the only way to heaven. After Jesus, that way doesn't work anymore. The law/commandments were given to a people that God knew couldn't follow them. That's why the cross was necessary. But if you think that now gives you free reign to sin, you've missed the whole point.

I'm a pre-trib guy, so by my way of thinking, the Christians are already gone by the time people are confronted with the MOB. So the selling of the MOB shouldn't really be a hard one. (This doesn't mean salvation still isn't available to those who had yet to accept Christ as their savior, the bible clearly says there will be. Probably Jews who listened to the profits, would be my guess.) But I would think those who are left would eagerly stand in line to receive the new form of global money. Especially if all the world's currencies have crashed under the weight of the debt governments are now accumulating.

There are common misconceptions about the Moon's density? That's news to me. I've never thought twice about the moon's density and I doubt most people have either. Much less have any misconceptions about it. But you speak as if you are an authority. Did you measure the Moon's density? Did someone else? What techniques were used, can they be trusted? You say everything is exactly as it should be, but is there any evidence to back up your claims? Personally, I find the whole fairy tale absurd. None of it checks out. None of the math adds up. None of the facts support the theories which are being taught as if they are indisputably proven fact, even though every test, every conducted, proves they are wrong. A perfect example of NASA at work - The moon rocks brought back in the 70's had a mystery, how could they have been made in the presence of a magnetic field? If the whole Giant Impact/Theia fairy tale is true, this shouldn't be possible. Here NASA explains that the moon and earth shared a combined magnetic field. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/earth-and-moon-once-shared-a-magnetic-shield-protecting-their-atmospheres Here scientists explain that the moon never had a strong magnetic field. They just measured the moon rocks wrong. https://theconversation.com/moon-lacked-a-magnetic-field-for-nearly-all-its-history-new-research-resolves-mystery-sparked-by-rocks-brought-back-on-apollo-163243 So which is it? Ask a so-called 'scientist' the answer is both. Whatever they need to justify their foregone conclusion is correct. Any result they find proves they were right all along. Were the moon rocks formed with or without a magnetic field? Answer - Doesn't matter, either way, we were right all along. Another example - The age of the earth. How do we know it? The US Geologic Survey tells us. - The oldest Moon rocks are from the lunar highlands and were formed when the early lunar crust was partially or entirely molten. These rocks, of which only a few were returned by the Apollo missions, have been dated by two methods at between 4.4-4.5 billion years in age. Great...but is that what the tests really revealed? In the nine papers published by the scientists NASA hand picked to study and date the first lunar rocks and thus date the Earth. Vast differences in ages were recorded for the same samples in the papers. Lunar Sample # 10017 was reported to have 19 different ages. But my favorite, was Lunar Sample #10084 which was determined to be 8.2 billion years old and 4.6 billion years old. To quote from - Age determinations and isotopic abundance measurements on lunar samples. Wanless RK, Loveridge WD, Stevens RD. …an extremely discordant age pattern ranging from 4670 m.y. for the 207Pb/206Pb ratio to 8200 m.y. for the 208Pb/232Th ratio is found…. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1970GeCAS...1.1729W/0001735.000.html Another example of how facts are changed to produce results.... As noted, our results were CORRECTED to account for the blank determined with the extraction and hence any modern lead component must in fact represent a CONTAMINANT in our sample. TATSUMOTO and ROSHOLT (1970) pre-treated their samples by washing in double-distilled acetone but this was not done in our laboratory since, as stated at the outset, WE WISHED TO OBTAIN DATA FOR THE ESSENTIALLY UNALTERED LUNAR MATERIAL. While the modification to the lead isotope values served to bring the Pb-Pb and Pb-U ages into general accord the Pb-Th remained discordantly high near 6.9 BILLION YEARS. https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1970GeCAS...1.1729W&db_key=AST&page_ind=7&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES You see it doesn't matter what the tests truly proved. They alter, distort, pervert and destroy the data to see what they want to see. When this doesn't work, they simply ignore the results. Rule No.1 - We are always right. Rule No.2 - If we are proven wrong, see Rule No.1. What have our tests really proved? Planet Formation theory failed - Three Theories of Planet Formation Busted, Expert Says https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/110222-planets-formation-theory-busted-earth-science-space Why all we knew about planets is wrong http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20130919-solving-a-planet-sized-problem Astronomy: Planets in chaos https://www.nature.com/articles/511022a Star Formation theory failed - New research undermines star formation theories https://www.upi.com/Science_News/2018/05/01/New-research-undermines-star-formation-theories/4681525189827/ Star-forming theory thrown into question https://cosmosmagazine.com/space/star-forming-theory-thrown-into-question/ The Big Problems in Star Formation: the Star Formation Rate, Stellar Clustering, and the Initial Mass Function https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0867 Mystery Deepens Over Where Sun Was Born https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/120117-sun-solar-system-born-stars-m67-space-science Moon Formation Theory failed - Study crashes main Moon-formation theory https://phys.org/news/2017-01-main-moon-formation-theory.html Origin of the moon called into question by groundbreaking new study https://www.rt.com/news/420210-origin-moon-study-synestia/ Solar System Formation Theory failed - Leading Theory For How The Solar System Formed Just Disproved! https://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2015/11/03/leading-theory-for-how-the-solar-system-formed-just-disproved-synopsis Death Spiral: Why Theorists Can’t Make Solar Systems https://www.space.com/2206-death-spiral-theorists-cant-solar-systems.html New Discovery Casts Doubt on How The Solar System Formed https://www.sciencealert.com/everything-we-think-about-the-formation-of-the-solar-system-might-be-wrong Universe Formation Theory failed - CERN Research Finds “The Universe Should Not Actually Exist” https://futurism.com/cern-research-finds-the-universe-should-not-actually-exist Scientists Have Concluded That The Universe Shouldn't Really Exist https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-concluded-that-the-universe-shouldn-t-really-exist None of it matters, they were right all along.

Not really, apparently it was a common practice when a new Pharaoh assumed power to wipe out all historic records and create a new narrative of history casting himself as being empowered by God or actually being God on earth. It's kind of hard to learn from history when someone keeps erasing it. Which might explain why there are no Pharaohs around today. To me the achievements of the Egyptians are just further proof that there is no such thing as evolution. We aren't one bit smarter today than we were thousands of years ago. If anything, we're probably dumber. I have no doubt the Pyramids are 100% man made. As far as the DNA stuff goes, it isn't DARPA. It's the Chinese. A few years ago, we developed to tool called CRISP-Cas9. This allowed us to target and remove specific segments of DNA. The Chinese quickly began human experimentation. The results were disastrous. There is a human genetic mutation that affects some people. They are missing 32 letters of genetic code. This mutation allows them to be virtually immune to AIDS and some other viruses. In one trial, the Chinese attempted to replicate this. The results were so awful that they never fully reported them. Overall, China shut down the trials and started prosecuting the doctors who conducted them. Before they shut down one trial, 19 of the 21 patients had died within a year. https://www.biospace.com/article/are-china-s-crispr-clinical-trials-running-off-the-rails-/ Since then other scientists have developed a way to change the DNA base pairs. An A-T can now be changed to a C-G and so on... This technology offers incredible possibilities and incredible dangers. We aren't qualified to play God. But that isn't stopping some people from trying to cash in on this. The bible speaks of people living to be 800 years old. Atheists scoff at that. But we could return to this in our lifetimes. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/02/190219111747.htm Dr. Church has already been able to reverse aging in human cells using CRISPR technology, and expects the first clinical trials of this technology to begin within as little as one year. https://www.lifeextension.com/magazine/2016/7/age-reversal-research-at-harvard-medical-school https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jul/24/elizabeth-parrish-gene-therapy-ageing

The most difficult topic I find in apologetics is wondering, why bother? You will never argue someone into heaven. And you are not supposed to, you present the gospel of Christ and the person you have witnessed to - is free to take it or leave it. The rest is up to the Holy Spirit and the person. As far as science, it's great to talk about. But only with Christians. We are told to, "avoid oppositions of science falsely so called" in 1 Tim 6:20. Is this because there is no way to oppose what's laughably being called 'science'? Of course not, it's just that it's a waste of your time. People who believe that a rock created itself out of nothing, and next a monkey crawled out of the rock and became their grandfather aren't about to hear that there might be a flaw in that plan. If you ask someone, "Where did your cell phone come from? Was it designed by an engineer you never met and built in a factory you've never seen?... Or, did it create itself out of thin air?" You tell me, what is the more logical and likely explanation? Unless you're crazy, the intelligent engineer is the most likely creator. Yet the Atheist who starts his argument from the premise of, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" doesn't even realize his claim of instant self creation of the Universe and everything in it, is the extraordinary claim. And that he's the one who must provide extraordinary evidence. How do you argue with this? In the south, there is a saying, "Boy...you can't fix stupid." But it's not really stupidity, it's a wilful choice to reject the gospel at any price. No matter how absurd any alternate explanation may be. With such a person, you're not going to have a discussion or a debate decided by facts, logic and truth. What you are going to have is an argument. And a argument is really just two idiots standing on the street corner yelling at each other. It's probably better to not be one of the idiots.

This is a great question. Which is actually many questions... 1. When the person reprimanding you is correct. 2. When the person reprimanding you is wrong. 3. When the person reprimanding you is speaking about matters of faith and doctrine. 4. When the person reprimanding you is speaking about matters of mankind, such as your boss. There is no one size fits all answer. If it comes to matters of faith, we should view everything through the lens of the bible. If you are secure about your beliefs, you should state your case and then agree to disagree and move on as quickly as possible. When it comes to matters of the job, I have rarely found it beneficial to correct my boss. OK, let met restate that...I have never found it beneficial to correct my boss. It doesn't matter how big a fool he is making of himself, pointing out his mistake is a far greater offense than anything you are likely to be accused of. That said, if the offense is something major, such as theft, then you have no choice but to defend yourself.

I'll go out on a limb and write a somewhat different answer. The bible repeatedly tells us life is a trial. 1 Peter 4:12 Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you: 1 Peter 1:7, James 1:12, Job 23:10 echo the point. But what kind of trial would it be if God repeatedly fixed the verdict? God does not usually tilt life in favor of those who worship him. Nor does he usually tilt life against those who deny him. (the rare exceptions are called miracles for a reason) Atheists love to ask,"Why doesn't God directly interact with man?" But if God did interact, would the atheist have any choice but to obey? No.. The Atheist would say, "I am a slave with no choice but to obey. God is a tyrannical slave master." If God stood on Mt. Olympus waiting to zap anybody who did wrong... and blessing anyone who did right. What freewill would anyone have? Thus the Atheist finds fault with God for not interacting with man but would find even greater fault with God if he did. Besides I don't think God has to prove himself to us. Did Job have a single answer? God already paid the ultimate price for us...if we don't want anything to do with that...That's our problem.

Thanks it's getting late...

Well...I might put it this way. 2 Timothy 2:12 If we deny him, he will deny us. What more important place to stand with God or deny him is there than the VOTING BOOTH? Cast your ballot Satan Jesus FOR AGAINST ____ Murdering Babies/Abortion ____ ____ Legalized Drugs ____ ____ Legalized Gambling ____ ____ Bible thrown out of classroom ____ ____ Evolution taught in classroom ____ ____ Homosexual behavior ____ What church have you been attending...What side have you been voting for? Whose side are you on?

Physics and Politics. That's all you need to debunk the idea of Aliens. 1. Physics The heavier something is, the more energy is required to move it. However, according to Einstein the faster something moves - the more mass it acquires. Consequently, moving at the speed of light for even one second requires infinite energy. The nearest star to Earth is about 4 light years away. Can you put that amount of fuel on a Shell card? Worse still, moving at light speed would effect the passage of time. Even if your flying saucer only flew at light speed for a minute, when you got off, everybody and everything you knew would be dead of old age. Well... that's if you could figure out a way to stop the UFO without destroying the entire Solar System. So basically, anybody with this level of technology, having arrived at Earth would notice us less than we notice bacteria. The funniest part about the UFO myth is that the Air Force shot one down. If you can travel faster than light, you should be able to travel in time. That means if you made a mistake, you could go backwards in time and fix it. So how can you crash a flying saucer when you can't make a mistake? Since all alien abductions take place on back roads when no one else is around...were the aliens hunting Bubba's pickup truck when all of a sudden - Wammo!!! That mountain just came out of nowhere and wrecked the flying saucer. I guess that's what they get for letting grandma drive after dark. 2. Politics Three Presidents have promised to publish all data about UFOs if elected. Carter, Clinton and Obama. Nothing has ever been published. Do you really believe that three self-serving politicians, all of whom ran for re-election and were opposed by the so-called "religious right". Would not have released any data they thought might damage the "religious right"? You might buy into a lot of things...but the notion that people like Clinton or Obama wouldn't act in their own selfish interests...That's just crazy on a level that I don't have the words to describe. All that said, there are legitimate UFO sightings. These almost always take place in the American Southwest between 5 Air Force bases, where Darpa tests it's secret aircraft.

In chess, the pawns are sacrificed. In real life, black people are the pawns. The fight against so-called 'racism' is a trap, which seems impossible to escape for those who are trapped. Here is a Washington Post article that details the results of 50+years of fighting so-called 'racism'. After Obama - Median White household wealth was $149,703 Median Black household wealth was $13,024 The black-white economic divide is as wide as it was in 1968 https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/06/04/economic-divide-black-households/ 50 years of fighting 'racism' has produced Zero results. They say repeating the same behavior over and over against, expecting a different result is the definition of insanity. How long will people who have a broken leg continue to put their arm in a cast and wonder why they can't move forward? If America were truly racist, why are all the other minorities doing so well? This Washington Post article also deals with 2016 data, when Obama was still President. So what results did 8 years with a black man at the helm of this country yield? African Americans are the only racial group in the U.S. still making less than they did in 2000 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/09/15/african-americans-are-the-only-racial-group-in-u-s-still-making-less-than-they-did-in-2000/ Average median income - Asian income - $81,431 White income - $65,041 Hispanic income - $47,675 Black income in 2000 - $41,363 in 2016 - $39,490 Of course, I fully expect to be labeled a racist for posting such facts. I'm also sure calls for by banning will follow. But before you do that, can I ask you one simple question? Who wins when black people lose? I mean... Who gets something out of hurting black people? Some redneck in a trailer park? Me? You? Any white person? Every election, black people storm to the polls to fight 'racism'. Who receives those votes? Answer that question and you will know Obama did what he did. And why black people can't get ahead. These links are all very left wing biased organizations, if you read nothing else, read the Jacobin article - How Obama Destroyed Black Wealth https://jacobinmag.com/2017/12/obama-foreclosure-crisis-wealth-inequality Obama's hypocrisy: He said blame Wall Street, not food stamps — but he bailed out bankers and cut help for the hungry https://www.salon.com/2016/01/13/obamas_hypocrisy_he_said_blame_wall_street_not_food_stamps_but_he_bailed_out_bankers_and_cut_help_for_the_hungry/ How Barack Obama Failed Black Americans https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/12/how-barack-obama-failed-black-americans/511358/ A Not-So-Good Man in Africa https://web.archive.org/web/20150626125212/https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/08/obama-africa-109674_Page2.html#.VY1LAPjLczY Why Did Obama Hold Back Hundreds of Billions In Housing Aid https://blackagendareport.com/content/why-did-obama-hold-back-hundreds-billions-housing-aid Geithner Admitted To Us Privately That Obama's Housing Policy Was DESIGNED To Sacrifice Homeowners In Order To "FOAM THE RUNWAY" For The Banks' https://upload.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5780311 Obama blamed George Bush for everything, but once elected he followed exactly the same policies. Obama came to power with Democratic Super-Majorities in both Houses of Congress. Nothing could have stopped him, so what did he do with unlimited power? 1. Did NOT tax the rich. "I didn't raise taxes once. I lowered taxes over the last two years," Obama said.(2/6/11) https://www.ibtimes.com/bill-oreillys-interview-president-obama-transcript-266147 2. Extended the Bush Tax Cuts. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/16/AR2010121606200.html 3. Did NOT raise the minimum wage. https://www.commondreams.org/views/2012/07/24/where-obamas-promised-minimum-wage-hike 4. Fracked and Drilled everything in sight and increased fossil fuel subsidies. https://popularresistance.org/obama-the-fracking-president/ https://www.cnn.com/2015/05/11/politics/obama-approves-arctic-drilling/index.html https://www.pacificenvironment.org/press-releases/obama-administration-fossil-fuel-subsidies-undermine-climate-talks/ 5. Produced the greatest transfer of wealth to the Top 1% in history. Obama admits 95% of income gains gone to top 1% https://money.cnn.com/2013/09/15/news/economy/income-inequality-obama/index.html https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/sep/10/stanley-greenberg/did-most-americans-lose-wealth-income-under-barack/ In the 1960s, Martin Luther King sold the soul of the black race to the Democratic party for a welfare check. What did the Devil get out of the deal? 1. 60 million dead babies in abortion clinics. (Most of them minorities) 2. The bible thrown out of the classroom. 3. Evolution taught in the classroom. 4. Drug legalization 5. Gambling legalization 6. Homosexuality taught as normal to children. All this is because of the black vote. What did black people get out of the deal? NOTHING but used and discarded, just like Eve and Judas. Reports state median Black wealth may reach zero by 2053 https://thegrio.com/2019/07/14/median-black-wealth-zero-by-2053/ And the saddest part of the trap ...is now I'll be attacked for telling people about it. "I'll have those N***** voting Democrat for the next 200 years" - LBJ https://www.quotes.net/quote/57364 It's not racism, this was planned all along. The more black people suffer the more ________ wins.