Why dont the Democrat/Liberls want 9/11 to go away

[Jedi4Yahweh]

Hi,

Have you noticed every time someone puts images of 9/11 on tv. The Demoncrates and Liberls go stir crazy. What are they afraid of? Why do they want 9/11 to desappear as if it never happened?

Is it because 9/11 reminds people of what the War on Terroism is all about? Is it because they feel it will make G.W. Bush look like he is doing the right thing in defeating terroist killers around the world? Is it because it stirs up american resolve and American patriotism? Maybe because it shows the true face of Islam and world hatred toward a good nation?

Honestly till me why you Democrats and Liberls hate reminding people of 9/11?

[Guest kitkat]

The Liberals hate being reminded of 9/11 because they know that GW Bush is and was right for declaring war against Afghanistan or Iraq and pursuing the war against terrorism by doing so.

Anything the liberals/democrats find that enhances Bush as our President is something they abhor, because they want to find as much fault in him as they can and with the grim reminder of 9/11, it only serves to show them something they cannot deny and that is, that Bush did the right thing by going after the terrorists that did this to us or any terrorist group that potentially could inflict terror on our nation again.

It would be another story if Al Gore had been in office and he had done the same thing Bush has done to fight the war against terrorism. The Liberal praise for Al Gore or any other democrat elected as President in that case would never stop.

Also it proves how mistaken Bill Clinton was during his administration for neglecting to take action against terrorists threats, when he knew they existed.

The democrats hate being proven wrong for anything and up until 9/11, most of the democrats agreed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, but now they say Bush lied about that and it's probably a source of embarassment to them that the records show, by their own statements, that they agreed with Bush about Saddam and his WMD's. 9/11 serves as a grim reminder to them about all their mistakes and neglect and anything that enhances GW Bush as President and makes them look bad is something they don't want to be reminded about.

It's strange how the democrats credibility, to them, is more important than all the lives that were lost in the Twin Towers.

Kat

[Guest LadyC]

river, like it or not, that generic thoughtless blanket statement does appropriately cover the majority of democratic politicians in our current social climate. no doubt it also covers some republicans. but it doesn't 'un' cover very many democrats at this point in time.

[Steff]

The Liberals hate being reminded of 9/11 because they know that GW Bush is and was right for declaring war against Afghanistan or Iraq and pursuing the war against terrorism by doing so.

It is one thing to go after terrorists, it is quite another to invoke expansionists policies invading other countries that doesn't do one thing to enhance the security of this country. Last I checked the President can't declare war, only congress may declare war. So in reality the war in Iraq is another "police action".

Anything the liberals/democrats find that enhances Bush as our President is something they abhor, because they want to find as much fault in him as they can and with the grim reminder of 9/11, it only serves to show them something they cannot deny and that is, that Bush did the right thing by going after the terrorists that did this to us or any terrorist group that potentially could inflict terror on our nation again.

If that were the case we would be going after white supremacists and the KKK with equal fervor but we aren't. In this country we do not penalize people for what they MIGHT do. We do have an obligation to pusure active intelligence gathering to protect ourselves but we do not invade other countries because they *Might* threaten us.

The democrats hate being proven wrong for anything and up until 9/11, most of the democrats agreed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, but now they say Bush lied about that and it's probably a source of embarassment to them that the records show, by their own statements, that they agreed with Bush about Saddam and his WMD's. 9/11 serves as a grim reminder to them about all their mistakes and neglect and anything that enhances GW Bush as President and makes them look bad is something they don't want to be reminded about.

Well Duh who fed them the information on Saddam's supposed WMD in the first place? It's akin to starting a multi million dollar project only to find out the plans you have are wrong. You don't continue building and throwing money away just because you've already started, you pull back re-examine the situation and make a new decision.

It's strange how the democrats credibility, to them, is more important than all the lives that were lost in the Twin Towers.

I'd think being credible in front of the people who elect you is quite important, Unfortunately this doesn't always cause a canidate to lose, look at Clinton he was a lying cheating thieving man yet he was re-elected.

As for people lost in The Twin Towers, we should not forget their loss and their sacrifice, but it should never be used as a platform for political gain, I think that is the Democrats' big objection.

[Guest kitkat]

Kitkat - I feel sorry for you. I truly do.  I have voted for both Democrats and Republicans in my time.  For someone to make such a generic, thoughtless statement as you have really sheds a bad light on the Republicans and Christians as a whole. 

May the Lord bring some peace to whatever it is within you that has made you so jaded towards your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ.

You feel sorry for ME????????? If you can't see the truth from what I said, you need to feel sorry for yourself.

May the Lord bring some peace to whatever it is within you that has made you so jaded towards your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ.

River, I think that's a TERRIBLE remark for a Chrisitian to say. It's totally inappropriate for a Christian to say something like that to another Christian and where you got the idea that I felt jaded towards my brothers and sisters in Christ is beyond me. You are out of line here.

Kat

[Guest LadyC]

river, like it or not, that generic thoughtless blanket statement does appropriately cover the majority of democratic politicians in our current social climate. no doubt it also covers some republicans. but it doesn't 'un' cover very many democrats at this point in time.

Why do I even bother? *sigh* Seeing as you all are the foremost authorities on everything biblical and political there really isn't any point in wasting my breath.

RIVER! i didn't think you'd ever stoop to trying to hurt my feelings... i've never claimed to be an authority on anything (other than the cause i advocate). you have strong opinions. so do i. our opinions often don't mesh. but you have never claimed to be an authority on what you say anymore than i have, and i would NEVER make such a snide comment to you. we've always respected each other despite our disagreements, and i'm horribly offended by what you just said.

now, if you didn't mean to direct it at me, then surely you would not have quoted me before making the comment. i do realize you put "you all" in it, so while i feel i took the brunt of that, i know the fallout was aimed at others.

[senerhu]

It is one thing to go after terrorists, it is quite another to invoke expansionists policies invading other countries that doesn't do one thing to enhance the security of this country. Last I checked the President can't declare war, only congress may declare war. So in reality the war in Iraq is another "police action".

expansionist policies...LOL. Have you been asleep? If we had expansionist policies, we'd still be in Kuwait, now wouldn't we??

Last I checked the President can't declare war, only congress may declare war. So in reality the war in Iraq is another "police action".

Congress authorized the use of force as did the UN with numerous resolutions...

If that were the case we would be going after white supremacists and the KKK with equal fervor but we aren't.

who says so?? you?

Well Duh who fed them the information on Saddam's supposed WMD in the first place? It's akin to starting a multi million dollar project only to find out the plans you have are wrong. You don't continue building and throwing money away just because you've already started, you pull back re-examine the situation and make a new decision.

do you need to be reminded of all the democrats who wanted the use of force in Iraq if saddam didn't comply with the UN resolutions and who agreed with Clinton that saddam HAD wmd"s...people like Daschle, Clinton, etc...?

As for people lost in The Twin Towers, we should not forget their loss and their sacrifice, but it should never be used as a platform for political gain, I think that is the Democrats' big objection.

yes it should be used politically when you have a blame America liberal running as a candidate on a platform that he will solve the terrorist problem by appeasment...geez steff, river, this one is for you

[Guest LadyC]

two things.

first of all, it is TOTALLY appropriate for any current events, or events that occurred during the current administration of ANY president, to be used in the forthcoming campaign. to think otherwise is totally assanine LOL... what on earth are they supposed to talk about, the events of the previous century???

second, the democrats have been using 9/11 and the subsequent war as their primary campaign focus since the day it began. it's their most fervent hate-speach against bush. what's good for the goose is good for the gander. if they can use it as hate speach, i praise God that freedom of speach allows it to also be spoken of in a positive manner.

oh wait... a third thing... steff, as much as i really don't even want a response from you because i loathe getting into disagreements with you... (because unlike river's and my disagreements, there is no respect between you and i), i can't help but wonder if you're trying to play off the fantasy that the bush administration was responsible for the intelligence reports during the previous administration? i've heard that ridiculous fantasy before somewhere, and it makes me laugh like crazy at the incredulity of it.

[Guest Calvin12]

Hi,

Have you noticed everytime someone puts images of 9/11 on tv. The Demoncrates and Liberls go stir crazy.

How do you know? Where do you get your information from? Do you have statistics on this? Has somebody done a poll? Could you site the stats on this and your source?

[Guest kitkat]

Hi,

Have you noticed everytime someone puts images of 9/11 on tv. The Demoncrates and Liberls go stir crazy.

How do you know? Where do you get your information from? Do you have statistics on this? Has somebody done a poll? Could you site the stats on this and your source?

FOX News baby!!

Kat