Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,156
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   60
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
What does this mean to you ServingHim ?

Galatians 1:6-10

6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel--

7 which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.

8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!

9 As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!

10 Am I now trying to win the approval of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ.

Is that unclear in anyway ?

In Him,

Bob

Did you know that the Church Fathers were the closest to the Apostles and whatever we have, came to us through them. To qualify as a Church Father, four conditions had to have been met.

1. He had to have lived before the year 800. The last Father in the East was St. Damascene 674-749, and of the West was, St. Bede the Venerable 672-735.

2. He had to have followed the orthodox teaching, faithful to the true doctrines of the Church.

3. He had to have Sanctity. All major Fathers and most minor Fathers were canonized Saints, and lived virtuous lives.

4. He had to have the sanction of the Church, a general acceptance.

They are divided into 2 groups, 39 Latin and 49 Greek Fathers. Some of the most prominent ones are:

Latin Fathers, Western:

St. Irenaeus of Lyons (d 202), Bishop.

St. Cyprian (d 258), Bishop.

St. Damasus I (d 384),

St. Ambrose of Milan (d 397), Bishop of Milan.

St. Jerome (d 420), priest.

St. Augustine (d 430), Bishop of Hippo.

St. Peter Chrysologus (d 450), Archbishop of Ravenna.

St. Leo the Great (d 461), Pope.

St. Fulgentius (d 533), Bishop of Ruspe.

St. Benedict (d 546), father of Western monasticism.

St. Gregory the Great (d 604), Pope.

St. Isadore (d 636), Archbishop of Seville.

St. Bede the Venerable (d 735), Doctor, last Father of Western Church.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Greek Fathers, Eastern... * means an Apostolic Father.

St. Clement of Rome * (d 97), Pope

St. Ignatius of Antioch * (d 107), Bishop of Antioch.

St. Polycarp * (d 155), Bishop of Smyrna.

St. Justin Martyr (d 165), apologist.

St. Clement of Alexandria (d 215), theologian.

St. Hippolytus (d 236), martyr.

Eusebius (d 340), Bishop of Caesarea.

St. Julius I (d 352), Pope.

St. Athanasius (d 373), Archbishop of Alexandria.

St. Basil the Great (d 379), Archbishop of Caesarea.

St. Gregory of Nazianzus (d 390), Bishop of Sasima

St. Gregory of Nyssa, Basil's brother (d 395)

St. John Chrysostom (d 407), Patriarch of Constantinople.

St. Nilus (d 430), priest and monk.

St. John Damascene (d 749), last Father of the Eastern Church.

Do you believe that ANY of these people are worth reading their studies/faith? Why or WHY NOT? IF these fathers learned directly from the Apostles, who in turn taught the next generation, wouldn't you think that they WERE WORTHY of reading and learning from them?

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.73
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.75
  • Reputation:   2,255
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

When Jesus was tempted by Satan, He quoted from the Torah - He didn't make up new words.

When Jesus was walking on the Road to Emmaus with two of His disciples after He rose from the grave, He referred to the Torah to tell them the Messiah would die and rise again.

When Paul preached to the people, he was always going back to the Torah.

He didn't go to Peter's word.

So, here we stand, eye to eye - both convinced the other is terribly, terribly deceived. I'll admit that you are better at this debate game than I am. Doesn't mean I agree with anything you said - but you are better at this. Trained perhaps?

So be it.

You go running to the Pope for your wisdom and revelation. I'll seek to learn the voice of the Holy Spirit for myself. I hope you can learn this joy some day, too.

Ciao!

(I need ot focus on getting ready for school anyway....)


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  84
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,478
  • Content Per Day:  0.19
  • Reputation:   4
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/23/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/11/1972

Posted
What does this mean to you ServingHim ?

Galatians 1:6-10

6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel--

7 which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.

8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!

9 As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!

10 Am I now trying to win the approval of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ.

Is that unclear in anyway ?

In Him,

Bob

Did you know that the Church Fathers were the closest to the Apostles and whatever we have, came to us through them. To qualify as a Church Father, four conditions had to have been met.

1. He had to have lived before the year 800. The last Father in the East was St. Damascene 674-749, and of the West was, St. Bede the Venerable 672-735.

2. He had to have followed the orthodox teaching, faithful to the true doctrines of the Church.

3. He had to have Sanctity. All major Fathers and most minor Fathers were canonized Saints, and lived virtuous lives.

4. He had to have the sanction of the Church, a general acceptance.

They are divided into 2 groups, 39 Latin and 49 Greek Fathers. Some of the most prominent ones are:

Latin Fathers, Western:

St. Irenaeus of Lyons (d 202), Bishop.

St. Cyprian (d 258), Bishop.

St. Damasus I (d 384),

St. Ambrose of Milan (d 397), Bishop of Milan.

St. Jerome (d 420), priest.

St. Augustine (d 430), Bishop of Hippo.

St. Peter Chrysologus (d 450), Archbishop of Ravenna.

St. Leo the Great (d 461), Pope.

St. Fulgentius (d 533), Bishop of Ruspe.

St. Benedict (d 546), father of Western monasticism.

St. Gregory the Great (d 604), Pope.

St. Isadore (d 636), Archbishop of Seville.

St. Bede the Venerable (d 735), Doctor, last Father of Western Church.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Greek Fathers, Eastern... * means an Apostolic Father.

St. Clement of Rome * (d 97), Pope

St. Ignatius of Antioch * (d 107), Bishop of Antioch.

St. Polycarp * (d 155), Bishop of Smyrna.

St. Justin Martyr (d 165), apologist.

St. Clement of Alexandria (d 215), theologian.

St. Hippolytus (d 236), martyr.

Eusebius (d 340), Bishop of Caesarea.

St. Julius I (d 352), Pope.

St. Athanasius (d 373), Archbishop of Alexandria.

St. Basil the Great (d 379), Archbishop of Caesarea.

St. Gregory of Nazianzus (d 390), Bishop of Sasima

St. Gregory of Nyssa, Basil's brother (d 395)

St. John Chrysostom (d 407), Patriarch of Constantinople.

St. Nilus (d 430), priest and monk.

St. John Damascene (d 749), last Father of the Eastern Church.

Do you believe that ANY of these people are worth reading their studies/faith? Why or WHY NOT? IF these fathers learned directly from the Apostles, who in turn taught the next generation, wouldn't you think that they WERE WORTHY of reading and learning from them?

I can copy/paste too :huh: Not trying to agitate this discussion, but I'd REALLY like to hear YOUR thoughts/defence on it and a direct answer to my question.....

God bless,

Bob


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,156
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   60
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
So why then are you preaching another Gospel - with is really no gospel at all ?

I don't believe that the gospel that I've come to know and love IS 'another' gospel...but the one of protestantism is the 'different' one. But again, it's MY opinion, just like how you feel about what I believe. I guess someday we'll all know. But the basics of the 'gospel', we ALL have in common, don't you think. And if you go and tell me that Catholics aren't Christian, then you'll have to answer to a higher power...it won't insult me, for it will only bless me... :il:


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,156
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   60
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
When Jesus was tempted by Satan, He quoted from the Torah - He didn't make up new words.

Then why can't these words of Jesus Christ be found anywhere in the BIBLE? In Acts 20:35, it says, "Remember the word of the Lord Jesus, that He Himself said, 'It is more blessed to give than to receive'". Where in Scriptures did Jesus get THIS from? Also, St. John say everything is NOT in the Bible? John 20:30,21:25 Is this meaningless? :huh:

Posted
All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 2 Tim 3:16

exactly our point to you. it's for teaching, correcting, reproving, etc.... and the RCC doctrine is not exempt from that usage. all comes back to the scriptures being the final authority, not the doctrine of a church, no matter how ancient their traditions. when all is said and done, it has to line up with scripture.

God gave us all a brain, and expects us to use it. the bereans set the example for us in doublechecking what we are taught by the church (in their case the apostles themselves) was scriptural. scripture does not tell us to blindly follow what we are taught by the church, it tells us to examine it against scripture. this has nothing to do with private interpretation, it has to do with reading/studying/trusting God's word above all other.

and since the subject of private interpretation keeps being used as a poison arrow against anyone here who does not swallow the unscriptural teachings of the RCC, may i remind you that even the first pope was an individual human being, and thus just as fallible to perpetual private interpretation?

servinghim, if i could pray just one prayer for you, it would be that God would open your eyes to the fact that, if God didn't say it, it just ain't so.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,156
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   60
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
So, here we stand, eye to eye - both convinced the other is terribly, terribly deceived.

oh so true!

I'll admit that you are better at this debate game than I am.  Doesn't mean I agree with anything you said - but you are better at this.  Trained perhaps?

no, just a wife and mother of 3 and a part-time interior decorator who happens to be passionate about her Lord Jesus Christ and defending His Body, the Church. :il:

So be it.

neb, we're not in a competition on who Jesus loves more...He loves us ALL EQUALLY!

You go running to the Pope for your wisdom and revelation.

You mean Christ who is leading His Church through His appointed OFFICE of Pope, which is now the wonderful, beloved Pope John Paul II. :cool:

I'll seek to learn the voice of the Holy Spirit for myself.

and when you disagree with even perhaps a family member on what something means, are you automatically the RIGHT one?!

I hope you can learn this joy some day, too.

JOY is not shown through typing online with strangers, dear... :huh: You have NO idea the joy...but then how could you. You don't receive Christ's Body and Blood ever? I pray someday you will....then you will experience pure joy!

Ciao!

(I need ot focus on getting ready for school anyway....)

God bless you, neb... :il:


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,156
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   60
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
What does this mean to you ServingHim ?

Galatians 1:6-10

6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel--

7 which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.

8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!

9 As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!

10 Am I now trying to win the approval of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ.

Is that unclear in anyway ?

In Him,

Bob

Did you know that the Church Fathers were the closest to the Apostles and whatever we have, came to us through them. To qualify as a Church Father, four conditions had to have been met.

1. He had to have lived before the year 800. The last Father in the East was St. Damascene 674-749, and of the West was, St. Bede the Venerable 672-735.

2. He had to have followed the orthodox teaching, faithful to the true doctrines of the Church.

3. He had to have Sanctity. All major Fathers and most minor Fathers were canonized Saints, and lived virtuous lives.

4. He had to have the sanction of the Church, a general acceptance.

They are divided into 2 groups, 39 Latin and 49 Greek Fathers. Some of the most prominent ones are:

Latin Fathers, Western:

St. Irenaeus of Lyons (d 202), Bishop.

St. Cyprian (d 258), Bishop.

St. Damasus I (d 384),

St. Ambrose of Milan (d 397), Bishop of Milan.

St. Jerome (d 420), priest.

St. Augustine (d 430), Bishop of Hippo.

St. Peter Chrysologus (d 450), Archbishop of Ravenna.

St. Leo the Great (d 461), Pope.

St. Fulgentius (d 533), Bishop of Ruspe.

St. Benedict (d 546), father of Western monasticism.

St. Gregory the Great (d 604), Pope.

St. Isadore (d 636), Archbishop of Seville.

St. Bede the Venerable (d 735), Doctor, last Father of Western Church.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Greek Fathers, Eastern... * means an Apostolic Father.

St. Clement of Rome * (d 97), Pope

St. Ignatius of Antioch * (d 107), Bishop of Antioch.

St. Polycarp * (d 155), Bishop of Smyrna.

St. Justin Martyr (d 165), apologist.

St. Clement of Alexandria (d 215), theologian.

St. Hippolytus (d 236), martyr.

Eusebius (d 340), Bishop of Caesarea.

St. Julius I (d 352), Pope.

St. Athanasius (d 373), Archbishop of Alexandria.

St. Basil the Great (d 379), Archbishop of Caesarea.

St. Gregory of Nazianzus (d 390), Bishop of Sasima

St. Gregory of Nyssa, Basil's brother (d 395)

St. John Chrysostom (d 407), Patriarch of Constantinople.

St. Nilus (d 430), priest and monk.

St. John Damascene (d 749), last Father of the Eastern Church.

Do you believe that ANY of these people are worth reading their studies/faith? Why or WHY NOT? IF these fathers learned directly from the Apostles, who in turn taught the next generation, wouldn't you think that they WERE WORTHY of reading and learning from them?

I can copy/paste too :huh: Not trying to agitate this discussion, but I'd REALLY like to hear YOUR thoughts/defence on it and a direct answer to my question.....

God bless,

Bob

Greetings Bob...I am trying to do as you ask...

So, would you mind answering my question? I had to copy and paste that list...sorry. What's your answer to my question? THanks. :cool:


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,156
  • Content Per Day:  0.15
  • Reputation:   60
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
All scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 2 Tim 3:16

exactly our point to you. it's for teaching, correcting, reproving, etc.... and the RCC doctrine is not exempt from that usage.

I didn't say it was... The Church's final authority stands on a three-legged stool:

Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition, Magisterium

READ HERE for more information

Christ did NOT establish a BIBLE, but a CHURCH...it's CLEAR in SCRIPTURE.

God gave us all a brain, and expects us to use it. the bereans set the example for us in doublechecking what we are taught by the church (in their case the apostles themselves) was scriptural. scripture does not tell us to blindly follow what we are taught by the church, it tells us to examine it against scripture. this has nothing to do with private interpretation, it has to do with reading/studying/trusting God's word above all other.

AMEN!!!!

So tell me...

1. How can the Holy Spirit tell the Lutherans the Eucharist is the true presence of Christ, and then tell the Baptists it is only a symbol?

2. How can the Holy Spirit tell the Methodists it is alright to have female ministers, and then tell the Baptists it is unbiblical?

3. How can the Holy Spirit tell the Seventh-Day Adventists that Saturday is the day of worship, and then tell the Presbyterians the day of worship is Sunday and not Saturday?

4. How can the Holy Spirit tell the Lutherans that the Blessed Virgin Mary was and remains always virgin, and then tell the Baptists she had other children?

5. How can the Holy Spirit tell the Baptists, "once saved always saved", and then tell the Church of Christ that Sola Fides is unscriptural?

6. How can the Holy Spirit tell Episcopalians to baptize infants and then tell Pentecostals infant baptism is invalid?

7. How can the Holy Spirit tell Mormons that the Holy Trinity is three separate persons, and then tell Methodists the Trinity is three persons in one GOD?

servinghim, if i could pray just one prayer for you, it would be that God would open your eyes to the fact that, if God didn't say it, it just ain't so.

So where did GOD say to WRITE THE BIBLE?! And WHERE did GOD say that He is ONE GOD, THREE PERSONS, all found in the 'DOCTRINE' of the Holy Trinity?!

I believe these all because the CHURCH has told us so, and you do to, though you probably won't admit that, even though it is TRUE!~ :huh:

DO you ever read the great Augustine? Did you know he said ...

"There are many other things which most properly can keep me in [the Catholic Church

Guest shiloh357
Posted
Was Mary without sin? Let's see what scripture says:

1 John 1:8-10

If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives.

No one can claim that they are without sin except for Jesus. The Bible makes no exception for Mary.

Infact, there is even a biblical record of Mary sinning. Behold:

Mark 3:20-21, 31-35

Then Jesus entered a house, and again a crowd gathered, so that he and his disciples were not even able to eat. When his family heard about this, they went to take charge of him, for they said, "He is out of his mind." . . .

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • This is Worthy
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...