Science and creationism vs Evolution theory and myth

[MarkNigro]

It is obvious that atheistic origin science really is not science at all. It actually matches pagan myth.

 

The evolution from atoms to man and Big Bang from nothing (evolutionary "science") defies all scientific principles. 

 

1. You would actually think after 150 years since Darwin someone would have an idea of what the first creature was like. There seems to no answer yet. 

 

Was it just proteins? How many amino acids? What was the sequence? How did the jump to RNA and DNA come about?

 

Was it just RNA and proteins? How many nucleotides? What was the sequence? How did the jump to DNA come about?

 

Was it DNA based? How many nucleotides? What was the sequence?

 

2. Empirical science starts with observing things that actually occur. But not evolutionary "science".

 

No one has ever observed nothing exploding into an entire universe. Yet evolutionary "science" concludes it must have happened.

 

No one has ever observed non-life becoming a living creature spontaneously by random chance. The observation is always life comes from life. Yet evolutionary "science" concludes that life from non-life must have happened.

 

No one has ever seen a set of proteins becoming an RNA based creature by random chance. 

 

No one has ever sen a creature consisting of RNA and proteins developing DNA capability.

 

No one is seen a creature developing new functionality and multiple genes by random chance.

 

Every object with high amounts of order and with large amounts complexity, information content, and functionality was made by an intelligent maker. Yet Yet evolutionary "science" concludes that living things, the most complex, information rich and most functional of all MUST have come from random chance and not from the Almighty Creator.

 

3. Evolutionary "science" has not a single fact, not based on a religious assumption, of anything older than 6,000 years old. Yet if refuses to state its assumption in its approach to origins. Real science states its assumptions.

 

4. Evolutionary "science" claims it has fossil of many transitional creatures (missing links). Yet no dates for the 3 species that must be there to establish a missing link have yet been given.

 

5. Real science has theories that can be tested and refuted. Evolutionary "science" is not real science. There is nothing there. So there is nothing to test and nothing to refute. It is just faith in pagan myth.

 

 

[JDavis]

I would challenge you to take some time and watch this debate <<<Removed Video Link>>> Keep videos to the Video Forums please. You can get it approved there and then link to it from here.

 

It is broken down into short segments which makes it a bit easier to watch.

[MarkNigro]

I would challenge you to take some time and watch this debate...

 

It is broken down into short segments which makes it a bit easier to watch.

You can fill in all the missing information that I cited from that debate in this discussion topic. 

[JDavis]

 

I would challenge you to take some time and watch this debate...

 

It is broken down into short segments which makes it a bit easier to watch.

You can fill in all the missing information that I cited from that debate in this discussion topic. 

 

 

If you have a true desire to learn then you would watch these two Christian men discuss the age of the earth.

 

If you have no desire to learn...well you will do what you just did.

Edited September 13, 2013 by Steve_S
Removed video link.

[MarkNigro]

 

I would challenge you to take some time and watch this debate....

 

It is broken down into short segments which makes it a bit easier to watch.

You can fill in all the missing information that I cited from that debate in this discussion topic. 

 

That is a very old debate isn't it?

 

Creation science has made great strides forward in it's case against evolution of atoms to man and long earth ages since them. 

 

In all that time evolutionary science has still produced nothing.

Edited September 13, 2013 by Steve_S
Removed Video link.

[JDavis]

And your decision is made.

Sorry to have bothered you

[MarkNigro]

 

 

I would challenge you to take some time and watch this debate....

 

It is broken down into short segments which makes it a bit easier to watch.

You can fill in all the missing information that I cited from that debate in this discussion topic. 

 

 

If you have a true desire to learn then you would watch these two Christian men discuss the age of the earth.

 

If you have no desire to learn...well you will do what you just did.

 

 

 

That is a very old debate isn't it?

 

 

Creation science has made great strides forward in its case against evolution of atoms to man and long earth ages of the universe since them. 

 

 

In all that time evolutionary science has still produced nothing.

 

 

In the end please provide the simple answers to the issues for this topic.

Or are there no answers to the issues I raised by evolutionary science.

 

 

 

 

BTW, Evolutionists keep trying to assign me stuff to read and watch. I have looked into this now for 15 years. I actually believed the lies of evolution of atoms to man and long earth ages of the universe at one time. But after looking at both sides and seeing the indoctrination of evolutionary science I now believe in 6-day creation 6,000 years ago. 

 

I also am a Christian. I also am a saved by the blood of Jesus Christ and have the Holy Spirit of truth.

 

So, here is your assignment:

 

Here are some sites you can look at:

 

creation.org

answersingenesis.org

icr.org

 

They have many books, articles and videos for you to read and watch.

 

When you are done, I'll give you more to look at.

Edited September 13, 2013 by Steve_S
Removed Video link.

[MarkNigro]

And your decision is made.

Sorry to have bothered you

Is it an old debate?

 

Simple question.

[JDavis]

 

 

That is a very old debate isn't it?

12 years or so.  Nothing in science has made the earth younger in that time.  And the first few episodes are about the wording of Genesis 1 and 2.  Pretty sure that has not changed in all that time.

 

 

BTW, Evolutionists keep trying to assign me stuff to read and watch. I have looked into this now for 15 years. I actually believed the lies of evolution of atoms to man and long earth ages of the universe at one time. But after looking at both sides and seeing the indoctrination of evolutionary science I now believe in 6-day creation 6,000 years ago. 

 

 

I never did buy into evolution, even before becoming a Christian.  

 

 

I also am a Christian. I also am a saved by the blood of Jesus Christ and have the Holy Spirit of truth.

 

Me too, yet you keep suggesting otherwise just because we don't see eye to eye.

 

 

creation.org

answersingenesis.org

icr.org

 

They have many books, articles and videos for you to read and watch.

 

When you are done, I'll give you more to look at.

 

Been there, done that.  I was once a young earther like yourself, but the evidence of an old earth both from the Bible and from science are too great to ignore.

 

ICR and AIG were once my bread and butter, but nothing on those sites stand up to any sort of scrutiny, they are written for those that already believe what they are peddling.

 

Sort of ironic that once again you are asking others to do what you will not do.  At least you are consistent I guess.

[Fez]

The title fried my brain, it's been a hard week, and I am trying not to think too much.....