jerryR34 Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted March 13, 2014 So, according to your example above, Mercury (57.9m miles from the sun) should be warmer than Venus (67.2m miles from the sun). Well it's not. Care to guess why? Maybe distance from the source of energy is not the only factor for heat? You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the second law. The corona being hotter than the photosphere in NO WAY violates the second law anymore than Venus being hotter than Mercury does (or do you dispute that Venus is hotter than Mercury). Hopefully you can see that distance isn't the only factor in heat (temperature). ================================================================= Jerry, Go back and Re-read the OP slowly. You're Mercury/Venus spiel is a Strawman. You're getting confused between the evidences......Heat and Speed of Particles. Really? Are you are saying that Venus is hotter than Mercury due to particle speed? That would presume particles pick up energy the further the get from the sun? You are making no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Author Share Posted March 13, 2014 I never posted that the corona was hotter than the source (nor does any scientist believe that). I posted that it is hotter than the photosphere (which is closer to the source than the corona). =================================================================== I never posted that the corona was hotter than the source (nor does any scientist believe that). What "scientists" believe is absolutely irrelevant. An equal statement with the same verifiability would be that scientists believe 3 toed gnomes are building a campfire in the SUN'S Core. I posted that it is hotter than the photosphere (which is closer to the source than the corona). What's Hotter than the PhotoSphere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheniy Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 223 Content Per Day: 0.06 Reputation: 27 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/07/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted March 13, 2014 ============================================================================================= I should have posted in a different thread. Try the Generalization Thread Nah. I should have posted in nebula's creation theory thread. Too bad it's closed now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted March 13, 2014 I never posted that the corona was hotter than the source (nor does any scientist believe that). I posted that it is hotter than the photosphere (which is closer to the source than the corona). =================================================================== I never posted that the corona was hotter than the source (nor does any scientist believe that). What "scientists" believe is absolutely irrelevant. An equal statement with the same verifiability would be that scientists believe 3 toed gnomes are building a campfire in the SUN'S Core. I posted that it is hotter than the photosphere (which is closer to the source than the corona). What's Hotter than the PhotoSphere? The corona. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerryR34 Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 18 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 588 Content Per Day: 0.15 Reputation: 82 Days Won: 2 Joined: 11/22/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/12/1969 Share Posted March 13, 2014 (edited) I never posted that the corona was hotter than the source (nor does any scientist believe that). I posted that it is hotter than the photosphere (which is closer to the source than the corona). =================================================================== I never posted that the corona was hotter than the source (nor does any scientist believe that). What "scientists" believe is absolutely irrelevant. An equal statement with the same verifiability would be that scientists believe 3 toed gnomes are building a campfire in the SUN'S Core. So, how would you characterize your OP? Is that what you believe about the sun or the standard model? Edited March 13, 2014 by jerryR34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Author Share Posted March 13, 2014 Really? Are you are saying that Venus is hotter than Mercury due to particle speed? That would presume particles pick up energy the further the get from the sun? You are making no sense. =================================================================== Not really...... because I'm not saying that. The Heat Issue and Particle Speeds are 2 Separate Issues. And Yes, Those particles do pick up Speed the Further away they get from the SUN (See Graph in the OP and Below) which put's Your and They're "Theory" of a Thermo-Nuclear Reaction into the Trash Bin of Fables In the Above Bar Graph, the bars to the left show the speed of Ionized Particles (Hydrogen and Oxygen) beginning on the Surface of the Sun, then----->Mercury------->Venus---->Earth. How In The World are they SPEEDING UP?? It's tantamount to throwing a baseball 90 mph then the ball continually speeds up the farther away it gets. Please don't say Gravity LOL Lets stick with the Heat Issue before we move to the Particle Issue to lessen confusion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Author Share Posted March 13, 2014 What's Hotter than the PhotoSphere? The corona. ======================================================== Good and Very True. My argument is....That if it's a Thermo-Nuclear Reaction Driving the SUN'S Engine (as we are Told) then......this is the Exact OPPOSITE than what WE would EXPECT..... and tells us there is some other process going on. PLASMA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Author Share Posted March 13, 2014 Nah. I should have posted in nebula's creation theory thread. Too bad it's closed now. Ahhh Yes, it's "Tragic" and "Tragedy" Please go through a couple threads and find my "Last Port In the Storm" Scenario for a full and detailed explanation/translation. And, I was reading through your posts....I think we were mis-communicating. What would you like me to explain regarding the Nebular Hypothesis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Author Share Posted March 13, 2014 So, how would you characterize your OP? Is that what you believe about the sun or the standard model? I'm saying that the Standard Model is HogWash. The Plasma Model is the only Game. Now if that's True, then.............................................Most of Cosmology and the current research and Theories Thereof is HOGWASH!! And Most Specifically: that the All Precious GRAVITY(The answer for everything) /Gravity Waves (predicted in 1916...and which we have never found after spending Billions of Dollars looking for) is a fairytale. **Special Note** Plasma-------------------------------> ElectroMagnetic Gravity-------------------------------> Gravity Strength: If Gravity = 1 ElectroMagnetic = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. 36 Orders of Magnitude GREATER ** In both Directions (Attraction/Repel) See where I'm headed with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheniy Posted March 13, 2014 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 1 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 223 Content Per Day: 0.06 Reputation: 27 Days Won: 0 Joined: 02/07/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted March 13, 2014 And, I was reading through your posts....I think we were mis-communicating. What would you like me to explain regarding the Nebular Hypothesis? Definitely miscommunicating! Glad we can agree on something. lol Okay. Can you explain how the Nebular Hypothesis contradicts with my speculation of Genesis on page 1 of this thread? I did read through your other (Nebular) thread and I think I got the gist of it. You brought it up when contradicting my post, and I was just hoping for some clarification. It's not a huge deal, though. I realize that I did sort of go off on a weird and imaginative tangent, and I'm sorry for going OT, but that's how my brain works. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts