Interesting article on homosexual supremacy

[OakWood]

The homosexual movement is the most hateful and most vile group in all of the Western world. The sodomites are supremacists; they believe that they have the superior lifestyle, a disposition and constitution more superior than the “others,” who they consider as inferior breeders. This is the ideology of sodomism.

Sodomism is the ideology of homosexual superiority, in which the homosexuals desire to usher in — through propaganda, violence and state coercion — a utopia in which homosexuality is seen as a supreme ideal, and those who believe in the conjugal union as is affirmed and established by the Christian Faith, are viewed and treated as enemies.

Many empires have advanced sodomism, with each attaching it to a particular religion. The Roman Empire advanced sodomism as it was associated with their own religion; the Seleucids advanced sodomism as it was associated with their hybrid religion of Syrian and Greek mythologies; the Greeks did the same, as did the Samurai and the Muslims.

St Paul was a witness to this supremacist way of thinking. He described the homosexuals as “proud, boasters,” (Romans 1:30) and as “leaving the natural use of the woman” (Romans 1:26). They are proud because they reject the woman, and this can only be described as someone esteeming himself as superior because of his homosexuality.

 

More here:

 

http://shoebat.com/2015/07/07/the-homosexual-movement-is-the-most-hateful-and-most-vile-group-in-all-of-the-western-world/

 

[JustinM]

I mentioned that a few weeks ago.  We are dealing with a group of people that believe they are morally, culturally, physically, and sexually superior to all others.  It is this extreme level of narcissism that blinds them to the truth about how harmful and deviant their lifestyle is.

 

Let's just see how superior this really is when you take away all the emotionalism.

 

Sexually.  A person believes they are superior because they choose to simulate the reproductive process with someone they can't reproduce with.  Does this sound like something that is smart?  So, in a natural sense, (Darwinism) this is actually the stupidest thing a species can do, since it relies on reproduction to propagate the species.

 

Physically.  So, they believe they are superior to others because they can simulate the reproductive process with as many partners as they want with no risk of pregnancy.  But, because homosexuals (statistically) simulate the reproductive process with so many different and oftentimes anonymous partners, they put themselves and others at risk of being infected with curable and incurable diseases and other physical, and emotional ailments that only come from this lifestyle.  In a lifestyle sense, these people suffer from more diseases, shorter lifespans and preterm degradation of normal body functions, how is that superior to others that do not subject themselves or their bodies to that type of abuse/misuse?

 

Morally.  Gay pride parades, are more a demonstration of lewd and shameless exhibitionism than a celebration.  Do  you all remember when we were told that what goes on in the bedroom stays in the bedroom?  Back then, we all at least agreed that heterosexuals or homosexuals shouldn't do that in public, but now it has moved out of the bedroom and into every facet of our lives.  When have heterosexuals ever turned a celebration into a public group simulation of the reproductive process?  Reproductive organs are being exposed to whomever is unfortunate enough to walk by, there is no modesty, no dignity and no respect or morality whatsoever.  How is the absence of morality more superior to morality?  If something doesn't exist, how can it be superior to anything?  Morality is whatever they claim it is in the moment.

 

Culturally.  How has culture been improved by this group?  What are their contributions?  Since before Shakespeare, people have been cross-dressing for entertainment, that is not a new contribution, that is called irony, I believe.  Some in these communities would say they are more educated, prestigious, and wealthy than heterosexuals, but these 3 things alone don't create culture, they may allow you to experience more of it, but experiencing a culture isn't the same as creating or enhancing it.

 

We aren't seeing supremacy from this group, only foolish hubris.

[OakWood]

I mentioned that a few weeks ago.  We are dealing with a group of people that believe they are morally, culturally, physically, and sexually superior to all others.  It is this extreme level of narcissism that blinds them to the truth about how harmful and deviant their lifestyle is.

 

Let's just see how superior this really is when you take away all the emotionalism.

 

Sexually.  A person believes they are superior because they choose to simulate the reproductive process with someone they can't reproduce with.  Does this sound like something that is smart?  So, in a natural sense, (Darwinism) this is actually the stupidest thing a species can do, since it relies on reproduction to propagate the species.

 

Physically.  So, they believe they are superior to others because they can simulate the reproductive process with as many partners as they want with no risk of pregnancy.  But, because homosexuals (statistically) simulate the reproductive process with so many different and oftentimes anonymous partners, they put themselves and others at risk of being infected with curable and incurable diseases and other physical, and emotional ailments that only come from this lifestyle.  In a lifestyle sense, these people suffer from more diseases, shorter lifespans and preterm degradation of normal body functions, how is that superior to others that do not subject themselves or their bodies to that type of abuse/misuse?

 

Morally.  Gay pride parades, are more a demonstration of lewd and shameless exhibitionism than a celebration.  Do  you all remember when we were told that what goes on in the bedroom stays in the bedroom?  Back then, we all at least agreed that heterosexuals or homosexuals shouldn't do that in public, but now it has moved out of the bedroom and into every facet of our lives.  When have heterosexuals ever turned a celebration into a public group simulation of the reproductive process?  Reproductive organs are being exposed to whomever is unfortunate enough to walk by, there is no modesty, no dignity and no respect or morality whatsoever.  How is the absence of morality more superior to morality?  If something doesn't exist, how can it be superior to anything?  Morality is whatever they claim it is in the moment.

 

Culturally.  How has culture been improved by this group?  What are their contributions?  Since before Shakespeare, people have been cross-dressing for entertainment, that is not a new contribution, that is called irony, I believe.  Some in these communities would say they are more educated, prestigious, and wealthy than heterosexuals, but these 3 things alone don't create culture, they may allow you to experience more of it, but experiencing a culture isn't the same as creating or enhancing it.

 

We aren't seeing supremacy from this group, only foolish hubris.

 

Correct. Well said.

[kwikphilly]

That was an excellent article Oak,,,,,very well said & it is right on point,,,,no beating around the bush on tippy toes,,,I really liked it a lot

 

 

 

BTW Justin.......excellent!Agreed!

[OakWood]

I mentioned that a few weeks ago.  We are dealing with a group of people that believe they are morally, culturally, physically, and sexually superior to all others.  It is this extreme level of narcissism that blinds them to the truth about how harmful and deviant their lifestyle is.

 

Let's just see how superior this really is when you take away all the emotionalism.

 

Sexually.  A person believes they are superior because they choose to simulate the reproductive process with someone they can't reproduce with.  Does this sound like something that is smart?  So, in a natural sense, (Darwinism) this is actually the stupidest thing a species can do, since it relies on reproduction to propagate the species.

 

Physically.  So, they believe they are superior to others because they can simulate the reproductive process with as many partners as they want with no risk of pregnancy.  But, because homosexuals (statistically) simulate the reproductive process with so many different and oftentimes anonymous partners, they put themselves and others at risk of being infected with curable and incurable diseases and other physical, and emotional ailments that only come from this lifestyle.  In a lifestyle sense, these people suffer from more diseases, shorter lifespans and preterm degradation of normal body functions, how is that superior to others that do not subject themselves or their bodies to that type of abuse/misuse?

 

Morally.  Gay pride parades, are more a demonstration of lewd and shameless exhibitionism than a celebration.  Do  you all remember when we were told that what goes on in the bedroom stays in the bedroom?  Back then, we all at least agreed that heterosexuals or homosexuals shouldn't do that in public, but now it has moved out of the bedroom and into every facet of our lives.  When have heterosexuals ever turned a celebration into a public group simulation of the reproductive process?  Reproductive organs are being exposed to whomever is unfortunate enough to walk by, there is no modesty, no dignity and no respect or morality whatsoever.  How is the absence of morality more superior to morality?  If something doesn't exist, how can it be superior to anything?  Morality is whatever they claim it is in the moment.

 

Culturally.  How has culture been improved by this group?  What are their contributions?  Since before Shakespeare, people have been cross-dressing for entertainment, that is not a new contribution, that is called irony, I believe.  Some in these communities would say they are more educated, prestigious, and wealthy than heterosexuals, but these 3 things alone don't create culture, they may allow you to experience more of it, but experiencing a culture isn't the same as creating or enhancing it.

 

We aren't seeing supremacy from this group, only foolish hubris.

 

Sexually: I agree. If I believed in Darwinism (which I don't) then homosexuals would be prime candidates for a Darwin award. Another reason why there is no gay gene. If there was it would have made itself extinct.

 

Physically: Statistically homosexuals do not live as long as heterosexuals. As well as disease they are more likely to suffer from depression, be suicidal or be afflicted with other ailments.

 

Morally: I also agree. I'm straight but I have no desire to expose myself in public or simulate sexual acts in order to prove that point.

 

Culturally: Homosexuals claim that many Ancient cultures and civilisations tolerated or encouraged homosexuality. The Greeks come to mind.

But this means nothing. These same cultures also practised slavery, but homosexuals never use that as a reason to promote slavery. Also, every single one of  these cultures has died out.