DARRELX Posted July 12, 2016 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 10 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 132 Content Per Day: 0.05 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/26/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted July 12, 2016 Living fossils are species that have been fossilized but still exist today. Now the Lobster is well known If evolution were true then no species supposedly living hundreds of millions of years ago would have stopped evolving. Living fossils are visible proof that evolution is not true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonky Posted July 12, 2016 Group: Nonbeliever Followers: 6 Topic Count: 2 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 738 Content Per Day: 0.20 Reputation: 346 Days Won: 0 Joined: 05/28/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted July 12, 2016 Except that evolution does not insist that an organism MUST evolve morphologically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwikphilly Posted July 12, 2016 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 96 Topic Count: 307 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 18,136 Content Per Day: 4.63 Reputation: 27,817 Days Won: 327 Joined: 08/03/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted July 12, 2016 Blessings DARRELLX..... Interesting that you chose"fossils" to refute evolution since fossils are generally remains preserved for an(alleged)minimum of roughly 10,000 years of age,,,,,so would you consider yourself a young or old earth creationist ? Just wondering,,,, With love-in Christ,Kwik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARRELX Posted July 12, 2016 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 10 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 132 Content Per Day: 0.05 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/26/2016 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 12, 2016 8 hours ago, kwikphilly said: Would you consider yourself a young or old earth creationist ? Just wondering,,,, With love-in Christ,Kwik Yes of course 11 hours ago, Bonky said: Except that evolution does not insist that an organism MUST evolve morphologically. Of course it does unless you still think along the line's of Darwinism rather then Neo Darwinism. If random beneficial mutations occur as Neo Darwinist claim, then it would be impossible for any species living supposedly hundreds of millions of years ago, to not change. If evolution were true no species could be exempt. Since evolution never happened living fossils make perfect sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARRELX Posted July 12, 2016 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 10 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 132 Content Per Day: 0.05 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/26/2016 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 12, 2016 9 hours ago, kwikphilly said: Interesting that you chose"fossils" to refute evolution since fossils are generally remains preserved for an(alleged)minimum of roughly 10,000 years of age. All living fossils are dated by secular reasoning as being hundreds of millions of years old. Obviously they can only be as old as the ancient flood.. What living fossils also prove is that all fossils still would be alive today if they had not gone extinct as species do even up to our time. Extinction of some species do not prove that they are evolutionary ancestors of species today. Plus the fossil records are completely static and any references to transitional fossils is pure rhetoric and wishful thinking. There is no evidence of gradually evolving species in the fossil records and if there were there would be no living fossils. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARRELX Posted July 13, 2016 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 10 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 132 Content Per Day: 0.05 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/26/2016 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 13, 2016 Oh I see Bonky you are a nonbeliever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willa Posted July 13, 2016 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 68 Topic Count: 186 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 14,242 Content Per Day: 3.33 Reputation: 16,657 Days Won: 30 Joined: 08/14/2012 Status: Offline Share Posted July 13, 2016 so are you talking about me???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARRELX Posted July 13, 2016 Group: Advanced Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 10 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 132 Content Per Day: 0.05 Reputation: 93 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/26/2016 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 13, 2016 55 minutes ago, Willa said: so are you talking about me???? Yes if you are a living fossil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woundeddog Posted July 13, 2016 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 6 Topic Count: 44 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 1,370 Content Per Day: 0.25 Reputation: 1,054 Days Won: 0 Joined: 06/21/2009 Status: Offline Birthday: 07/18/1868 Share Posted July 13, 2016 My daughter calls me a living fossil--- I have not evolved at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwikphilly Posted July 13, 2016 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 96 Topic Count: 307 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 18,136 Content Per Day: 4.63 Reputation: 27,817 Days Won: 327 Joined: 08/03/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted July 13, 2016 Hi DARRELX... Quote Posted in Living Fossil's 8 hours ago, kwikphilly said: Would you consider yourself a young or old earth creationist ? Just wondering,,,, With love-in Christ,Kwik Yes of course ? lol, Which one? perhaps undecided? If I may ask............ With love-in Christ,Kwik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts