DARRELX

Evolution fails at every step of the fairytale. Abiogenesis is impossible. Single cell to multicellular life is impossible. Multicellular species evolving new biological traits is impossible. Enough rhetoric I challenge an EVO to prove these things possible with real evidence rather then faith based claims and wishful thinking.

Variations in species is not evidence for evolution. Can you give examples of mutations that produce new biological traits? According to Neo Darwinism, beneficial mutations are random and have nothing to do with the enviroment, so all species would change over time. Living fossils debunk that belief and you just present an argument from ignorance.

Tell me how to be ready. What is that?

I guess He is coming whether I am ready or not.

I think that Arabs by nature are very volitile people and are not easily reasoned with. I do not know where this idea that Islam is a peaceful religion came from unless it is a liberal Obamanation successful propaganda campaign, because Islam has roots in violence and a history of violence and the Qur'an itself teaches violence. 2:216. Fighting is ordained for you, even though you dislike it. But it may be that you dislike something while it is good for you, and it may be that you like something while it is bad for you. God knows, and you do not know. A peaceful religion does not teach that fighting is ordained for you whether you like it or not.

I could not think of anything more boring.

What is a McCarthyites?

2 Peter 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts. Could be the last days for these mockers and the last days we will have to endure them. We should bring before God the words of these mockers in prayer just as king Hezekiah had done with the letter from the King of Assyria. Isaiah 37:14 And Hezekiah received the letter from the hand of the messengers, and read it: and Hezekiah went up unto the house of the LORD, and spread it before the LORD.

I remember seeing that on TV. Very bizarre.

Romans 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob. What does Paul mean by all Israel shall be saved? Or rather what does Paul mean by Israel?

I am more inclined to believe that there is no rapture like in the Left Behind books but that when Jesus returns then the world is destroyed. 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

I believe that an atheist chooses to believe that there is no God because they want nothing to do with Him. This is due to God's moral law of which conflicts with there lifestyle choices. They do have a set paradigm that everything has a natural explanation no matter what. From that they have another paradigm and that is evolution is true no matter what. These are set dogmatic beliefs. Natural rhetoric and evolutionary rhetoric has become sustained by several dogmatic arguments for evidence. This has all the hallmarks of an seclusive and exclusive cult. Atheism has become a religion in every sense of the word because to be an atheist you have to adhere to a set of beliefs or doctrines.

I would say it is a lot of work for nothing if you end up at the start. My question is, is it work if we do not sweat? Genesis 3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

Water is made of oxygen and nitrogen. It is inconceivable that these two chemicals are eternal.

LOL silly mistake on my part. I am a young earth creationist. I do not believe that there was a gap between God creating heaven and earth and saying, "Let there be light." Or a gap between creating the heaven and earth and the earth being formless and void. That is just wishful thinking and the arguments for a gap are unconvincing. The idea of an old earth came from atheists, just as evolution has. The dating method for rocks has been shown to be unreliable because newly formed volcanic rock can date in the millions of years. So this gap idea comes from Christians who want to reconcile atheistic reasoning with scripture. All atheist really have for an old earth that is actually credible is light from the stars. I have no doubt that when God commanded the light to shine out of darkness to be for times and seasons, He made it so we can see it. If God commands the light from any star to be seen by earth, then it will be. Or God could simply have stretched the light from there to here immediately. God created light without any source at first so He can create the Stars to shine on the earth. Also creationist give plenty of evidence for a young earth so why would a Christian not take that evidence seriously?