HisFirst Posted January 1, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 21 Topic Count: 315 Topics Per Day: 0.11 Content Count: 3,491 Content Per Day: 1.26 Reputation: 2,582 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/25/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted January 1, 2018 2 hours ago, MorningGlory said: My son in law worked on the software and camera systems on many of the programs at NASA. They are NOT paintings. Just because you 'heard' something doesn't mean it's true. And how many asteroids do you know that you can say this one looks fake? Its ok sis. It looks enhanced and has that unrealistic look - my eldest son did computer graphics in senior high school and it looks like something he would have produced back then, 7 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted January 1, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted January 1, 2018 1 minute ago, HisFirst said: Its ok sis. It looks enhanced and has that unrealistic look - my eldest son did computer graphics in senior high school and it looks like something he would have produced back then, 7 years ago. Well you are right to a certain extent, HF. Sometimes the images do have to be enhanced, 'cleaned up' so to speak, but NASA does post the raw photos as well. IMO, the 'skull shape' would appear from a certain angle but, most likely, if you viewed that rock from the other side it would look totally different. Like the 'face on Mars' thing, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HisFirst Posted January 1, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 21 Topic Count: 315 Topics Per Day: 0.11 Content Count: 3,491 Content Per Day: 1.26 Reputation: 2,582 Days Won: 3 Joined: 09/25/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted January 1, 2018 Just now, MorningGlory said: Well you are right to a certain extent, HF. Sometimes the images do have to be enhanced, 'cleaned up' so to speak, but NASA does post the raw photos as well. IMO, the 'skull shape' would appear from a certain angle but, most likely, if you viewed that rock from the other side it would look totally different. Like the 'face on Mars' thing, Yes, I go along with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted January 1, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted January 1, 2018 23 minutes ago, MorningGlory said: but NASA does post the raw photos as well. Sure. Post One with the Source File...? regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omegaman 3.0 Posted January 2, 2018 Group: Graduated to Heaven Followers: 57 Topic Count: 1,546 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 10,320 Content Per Day: 1.41 Reputation: 12,323 Days Won: 9 Joined: 04/15/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/05/1951 Share Posted January 2, 2018 On 12/24/2017 at 2:53 PM, Sojourner414 said: Now if only we saw an asteroid that looked like a cheeseburger! No planets (not even flat ones) or cows were hurt in the making of this picture. However, if you look carefully, and use your imagination, you you can almost see what looks like a square of cheese, on top of that 'patty'. That slice is from a real asteroid. Additionally, although no cow was injured making this image, one was (coincidentally) killed, making the burger patty that this fake asteroid image was derived from. Fortunately, the cow was likely delicious. After making this image, I needed to name the file, and I recalled that in my former neighborhood, there was a place called Astro Burger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted January 2, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted January 2, 2018 2 hours ago, Omegaman 3.0 said: No planets (not even flat ones) or cows were hurt in the making of this picture. However, if you look carefully, and use your imagination, you you can almost see what looks like a square of cheese, on top of that 'patty'. That slice is from a real asteroid. Additionally, although no cow was injured making this image, one was (coincidentally) killed, making the burger patty that this fake asteroid image was derived from. Fortunately, the cow was likely delicious. After making this image, I needed to name the file, and I recalled that in my former neighborhood, there was a place called Astro Burger. Now that's MY kind of asteroid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1to3 Posted January 2, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 22 Topic Count: 139 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 4,224 Content Per Day: 1.23 Reputation: 3,075 Days Won: 0 Joined: 11/28/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted January 2, 2018 (edited) Ever heard of Math Powerland ? Math Powerland(born Matthew Leonard Boylan, August 11, 1978) is freelance graphics specialist and artist , professional hyper realist painter and political scientist . Powerland received a double major of political science and philosophy degree from St. Francis Xavier University of Antigonish, Nova Scotia. He allegedly painted high altitude, aerial footage and space imagery for covert PR and graphics subcontractors. Powerland has been hired by Rasa , Nasa, Esa and the Canadian Space agency and has been a consultant on hyper realism in film and television . http://flatearthwiki.com/index.php?title=Math_Powerland He did work for NASA Check his you tube video how he explains...about NASA and their photoshoped pictures. NASA WHISTLE BLOWER IMAGE HOAXSTER NASA WHISTLEBLOWER IMAGE HOAXSTER INTERVIEW part 2.mov nasa whistle blower part 3 Edited January 2, 2018 by 1to3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted January 2, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted January 2, 2018 5 hours ago, Enoch2021 said: Sure. Post One with the Source File...? regards Here's a link to 13 years of raw images. Take your pick. https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/galleries/raw-images?order=earth_date+desc&per_page=50&page=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enoch2021 Posted January 2, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 11 Topic Count: 19 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 3,396 Content Per Day: 0.90 Reputation: 730 Days Won: 4 Joined: 12/21/2013 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/26/1963 Share Posted January 2, 2018 13 hours ago, MorningGlory said: Here's a link to 13 years of raw images. Take your pick. https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/galleries/raw-images?order=earth_date+desc&per_page=50&page=0 All of your images have this Blurb next to it: "The camera was pointing toward SATURN, and the image was taken using the CB2 and CL2 filters. This image has not been validated or calibrated. A validated/calibrated image will be archived with the NASA Planetary Data System." I need "Validated" images and their Source Files...? It makes little sense to Invalidate Non-Validated images. regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted January 2, 2018 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.11 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Author Share Posted January 2, 2018 1 hour ago, Enoch2021 said: All of your images have this Blurb next to it: "The camera was pointing toward SATURN, and the image was taken using the CB2 and CL2 filters. This image has not been validated or calibrated. A validated/calibrated image will be archived with the NASA Planetary Data System." I need "Validated" images and their Source Files...? It makes little sense to Invalidate Non-Validated images. regards They are not MY images. If you need validated images, when you said you wanted raw ones, then Google them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts