Daniel & Revelation Reveal The Antichrist

[Guest shiloh357]

You accuse me of sloppy hermeneutics. But then you highlight

[BibleStudent]

Shiloh is a Messianic Jew, silly!

You say that as if it meant something to the issue at hand. I wouldn

[BibleStudent]

Shiloh,

I hope that you understand that my comment about Rastifarians has to do only with the subject of the discussion. I am pleased that as a Jew you have come to Christ. The last post was too long to tackle your comments.

Yes, and when we are talking about spiritual matters, God does not care about your ancestry. The Kingdom of God is made up of every tribe and tongue. God does not show favoritism, and will save all who come to him. The key is that "IN CHRIST" these superficial racial or societal boundaries do not exist. This however STILL does not indicate that God's hand is not still upon natural Israel, and that he does not still have a plan for them in this world.

Your statement is quite accurate, as far as it goes. But it assumes that God

[Guest shiloh357]

QUOTE

Yes, and when we are talking about spiritual matters, God does not care about your ancestry. The Kingdom of God is made up of every tribe and tongue. God does not show favoritism, and will save all who come to him. The key is that "IN CHRIST" these superficial racial or societal boundaries do not exist. This however STILL does not indicate that God's hand is not still upon natural Israel, and that he does not still have a plan for them in this world.

Your statement is quite accurate, as far as it goes. But it assumes that God

[BibleStudent]

(Regarding BibleStudent

[nebula]

Dear Mr. BibleStudent -

Are you saying then that because I have never written a research paper on the subject that I don't know anything?

Since teaching hermeneutics is your job, obviously you have a distinct advantage over me. I bet your breakdown of Romans 11 was a previous research paper you had written, correct? (Surely, you did not just write the whole response last night in your spare time - references and all!)

I just wrestled for a few hours in working together a response to a young man in the "Apologetics" forum who goes by the name of Logician. He professes to have been a Christian all his life, but then began questioning his faith - or in his terms, "What my parents taught me," and began a search that led him to becoming now an atheist. He's bringing in all these bizarre logical arguments about why it is illogical for an omniscient omnipotent God to exist, and therefore He doesn't.

Since this is your training, do you think you can help me?

Would you spend some time reasoning with this young man to uncover the fallicies of his logical arguments?

It's in the thread titled: "Beating a dead horse."

But this is what I meant by time - I do interract on other areas of the Board, not just this one.

And I do have other jobs one of which is a teaching position, and you know how much extra time that can take grading papers and lesson planning and all!

Seriously, though - reading your response was incredibly disheartening, and actually very demeaning.

No, I have not written a paper or a treatise on the End Times and of Israel. I never had the need or the reaso to.

This does not mean I have never read about nor researched the matter.

If it means anything, I have been commited to following Jesus since I was about 5 or so; I have read the Bible thorugh several times, I've heard so many teachings and sermons they're coming out of my ears now *smirk*, and I have engaged in personal study on various topics of faith.

I also attended a Christian college where I had gone through Bible classes.

I used to believe that anyone with a Bible degree was a guarenteed authority on all things Biblical and should be regarded with the highest respect.

I was cured of this my first day of Intro. to Bible class taught by Dr. Oxford graduate theologian who told us that the book of Proverbs is nothing more than a series of principles that should, but do not always, work and apply to our lives.

That's not what I would have called treating the Bible as the word of God!

So, you will have to pardon my regard for hermaneutics not being my basis for theology.

Actually, my view of theological studies is expressed by the quote I use in my signature. Here is the full quote:

"The Bible is not an owner

[Guest shiloh357]

QUOTE

(Regarding BibleStudent

[M45510G1C]

It would be really wonderful if we could start reading the NT through the lens of the OT rather than the other way around.

[Guest FINAL NOTICE]

Recognizing the Antichrist (son of Satan) was introduced to the world on the 01st of March 2004 in the form of Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov and as world events increase rapidly towards the fulfilment of the predominance of the Bible prophecies and the concluding three and a half years of mankind

[Guest Bro David™]

Recognizing the Antichrist (son of Satan) was introduced to the world on the 01st of March 2004 in the form of Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov and as world events increase rapidly towards the fulfilment of the predominance of the Bible prophecies and the concluding three and a half years of mankind