Jump to content
IGNORED

Concerns about scripture bombing


OneLight

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,251
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5,858
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/09/2009
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, Servant of the Lord said:

I strongly disagree with the position of "scripture bombing."

Individual scripture needs to be interpreted considering not only the entire chapter in which it is found, then the book in which it is found (for proper context), and finally the verse must be considered within the Bible as a whole; Hanging a major theological position on such a small nail (one verse) will not hold.

To draw a scriptural interpretation based on just one verse in the entire chapter in which it is found could do great violence to the actual meaning that was intended. A good example of this tactic is found in 1 Corinthians 11, where vs. 15 is commonly singled out to conclude a woman's hair is her covering and disregarding the rest of the other 14 verses - half a chapter of Holy Scripture!  I'm not going into detail about that here I wrote a separate post on this recently.

"Jesus wept"

No book. No chapter, or verse. No context.
Can you understand (see in your mind) what those nine bits of data represent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  194
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  11,053
  • Content Per Day:  6.54
  • Reputation:   9,015
  • Days Won:  36
  • Joined:  09/12/2019
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/09/1956

1 minute ago, Sower said:

"Jesus wept"

No book. No chapter, or verse. No context.
Can you understand (see in your mind) what those nine bits of data represent?

Ten--you neglected that poor little space.

:-)

  • Brilliant! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,251
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5,858
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/09/2009
  • Status:  Offline

2 minutes ago, Alive said:

Ten--you neglected that poor little space.

:-)

That's cool. I really did consider that.
In my wildest dreams, I didn't figure it would be noticed.
Sharp observation!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  194
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  11,053
  • Content Per Day:  6.54
  • Reputation:   9,015
  • Days Won:  36
  • Joined:  09/12/2019
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/09/1956

3 minutes ago, Sower said:

That's cool. I really did consider that.
In my wildest dreams, I didn't figure it would be noticed.
Sharp observation!

I am a bits and bytes kinda guy and exactitude is required in such things. Details, man.

Love---Alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,251
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5,858
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/09/2009
  • Status:  Offline

ancestral founder was Moab, a son of Lot

2 minutes ago, Alive said:

I am a bits and bytes kinda guy and exactitude is required in such things. Details, man.

Love---Alive.

I have two electrical engineer cousins with a masters and doctorate,
and had often to listen to their counting with ones and zeros, binary.
As a carpenter, all I can handle is fractions, to sixty fourths. But counting with two bytes?
I'm a HS dropout, but I still have an old/ancient PC running on DOS,
on my CNC machine,  and have to wip up a 'C' prompt.
No spaces, jot or tittle is tolerated. It's a hate/love relationship.

"I am a bits and bytes kinda guy"

Did you know your history of   bits and bytes
The Moabites ancestral founder was Moab, a son of Lot.
It takes one thousand moabites to make one megabite!.....
...default_cool2.gif.f17bbebb42b4b81b306255416e9f8c5b.gif

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  65
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/16/2019
  • Status:  Offline

30 minutes ago, Sower said:

"Jesus wept"

No book. No chapter, or verse. No context.
Can you understand (see in your mind) what those nine bits of data represent?

Yes, so does the word "Love." Which is 4 bits of data could easily be understood by itself without supporting scripture. Yet, that is not what is being referred to in my post, but rather reading just one VERSE and not taking into account that individual scripture needs to be interpreted considering not only the entire chapter in which it is found, then the book in which it is found (for proper context), and finally the verse must be considered within the Bible as a whole. 

Edited by Servant of the Lord
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  194
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  11,053
  • Content Per Day:  6.54
  • Reputation:   9,015
  • Days Won:  36
  • Joined:  09/12/2019
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/09/1956

3 minutes ago, Sower said:

ancestral founder was Moab, a son of Lot

I have two electrical engineer cousins with a masters and doctorate,
and had often to listen to their counting with ones and zeros, binary.
As a carpenter, all I can handle is fractions, to sixty fourths. But counting with two bytes?
I'm a HS dropout, but I still have an old/ancient PC running on DOS,
on my CNC machine,  and have to wip up a 'C' prompt.
No spaces, jot or tittle is tolerated. It's a hate/love relationship.

"I am a bits and bytes kinda guy"

Did you know your history of   bits and bytes
The Moabites ancestral founder was Moab, a son of Lot.
It takes one thousand moabites to make one megabite!.....
...default_cool2.gif.f17bbebb42b4b81b306255416e9f8c5b.gif

 

Thank you. That was worth the price of admission.

I am not really a bits and bytes guy. More of an 'information' conveyance guy.

That space was crucial info.

LOL

Actually--I am a carpenter and pretty much all the trades....semi-retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  65
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/16/2019
  • Status:  Offline

20 minutes ago, DustyRoad said:

I'll go over what "scripture bombing" is once again for your benefit my friend, even though this has been regurgitated before in this very thread. I'll use numbers so anyone can follow along. :) 

  1. It's unique to the internet message board format.
  2. It can't happen in classrooms or during bible study. Understand this: Scripture bombing can't happen in such environs because... :emot-drums: (refer to #1)
  3. It can't actually happen in certain areas of the forums which are dedicated to scripture study... theological debate... and similar pursuits. Understand this: scripture bombing can't actually occur in certain parts of this forum because copying and pasting large amounts of scripture in a post are often necessary in such places! (:doh:)
  4. Remember #1? This is an internet message board and it helps to not forget that. :)  

According to the original author of the thread who referenced his definition of "scripture bombing" from the following blog post your list is not correct nor is your definition about "scripture bombing."

The definition of "scripture bombing" I responded to which is in regards to the definition the original author set forth in his original post and was supported by his referenced blog post he found. - link below.

 http://www.faithmeetsworld.com/scripture-bombing/ 

Edited by Servant of the Lord
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  6
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  65
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/16/2019
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, DustyRoad said:

Of course you're right, sister. I'm guilty of thinking that newcomers might actually be interested in fellowship, not behaving like another Foghorn Leghorn with an internet connection. God bless you for the reminder. 

 

2 hours ago, maryjayne said:

Sometimes just putting people on ignore is best ❤️

No board etiquette was violated here, nor was I rude at any time.  Please read my response in its entirety. 

Yet, these two post are not considered rude?

Edited by Servant of the Lord
typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,251
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5,858
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/09/2009
  • Status:  Offline

1 hour ago, Servant of the Lord said:

Yes, so does the word "Love." Which is 4 bits of data could easily be understood by itself without supporting scripture. Yet, that is not what is being referred to in my post, but rather reading just one VERSE and not taking into account that individual scripture needs to be interpreted considering not only the entire chapter in which it is found, then the book in which it is found (for proper context), and finally the verse must be considered within the Bible as a whole. 

I agree with your statement, Servant. If I was in some kind of intense theological discussion/debate,
I will give as much context as warranted, if  I feel it necessary.
'Jesus wept' draws out a flood of emotions for me, not needing support from elsewhere.
Not trying to 'prove' something additional.

Often I use the story of people being stoned in the old testament for illustration of context.
I have to tell seekers it doesn't mean doing drugs, but getting executed. Context/understanding.
When I am simply discussion scripture with friends, or a seeker, I don't even quote chapter or verse.
Often can't remember it.
But that does not negate the truth/light that I'm trying to share.

As a carpenter, I can state confidently that a two by four # 2 yellow pine kiln dried stud
spaced sixteen inches on center will support a second story structure.
I cannot quote the page, chapter, or the code book, but I know it works as designed,
and will confidently advise someone asking for verification.

It's just some times the intense scrutiny applying rules of study overwhelms the
gist/purpose of the topic, and a new (off)topic of 'proper study/Hermeneutics entails.
I try to present/study truth simple and understandable.  (mostly for myself to understand).............
default_cool2.gif.3f25352eb084b402ee0e05aabad5f6e7.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...