2300 day prophecy

[Guest Blessed by Association]

YOUR WELCOME

[Remnantrob]

there's gotta be someone that can explain the gap theory in the 70 week prophecy. I'd really appreciate it because I don't know much about it and I wanna see it from another point of view.

[Remnant]

I cant...but I can offer some more information on the 2300 prophecy and the SDA Church. Shortly after the great disappointment....Not Ellen White, but Hiram Edsom received a vison from the Lord where he saw Jesus enter into the Holy Place. Immedialtely, his mind was directed to the above quote from Malachi and the question was asked...Is there another sanctuary? He and another Adventist by the name of O.RL. Crozier penned an article after a careful study of what he had seen. It was posted in "THE DAY-STAR EXTRA, Saturday, February 7, 1846. by O. R. L. Crozier entitled "The Sanctuary";

Here is a link to the article.

The Sanctuary by O.R.L Crozier

As you can see, they didnt immediately published their findings. AFter their findings they begin to meet with the other Adventists who were only 9 or so in number to show their findings. This is the foundation of the Seventh-day Adventist church. They begin to study all the doctrines of the bible. They did not officially call themselves SDA until 1860; the General Conference was formed in 1863.

I am student of Bible History from Adam to now!!!!!! I know all the great movements within the SDA church and the ones that are coming....RemnantRob. know what I mean;-)

[Remnantrob]

there's gotta be someone that can explain the gap theory in the 70 week prophecy.  I'd really appreciate it because I don't know much about it and I wanna see it from another point of view.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

The seventieth week is complete by 3.5 years of Christ

[Remnantrob]

I don't undrstand where they get 2,300 days in daniel 8. The earliest writing that I can find that has writen 2,300 is the vulgate and it seems that everyone else followed suit.

But the other old texts say 3,300.

'eleph    a thousand  @,  as numeral

shaw-loshe'      three, triad  @, 3, 300, third

may-aw'        hundred  @, as simple number  @,  as part of larger number

There is no 2 in the other texts. So where did they get the 2 and why?

   

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This is a first for me. I've never heard this before. Thanks for the post.

[Remnantrob]

I don't undrstand where they get 2,300 days in daniel 8. The earliest writing that I can find that has writen 2,300 is the vulgate and it seems that everyone else followed suit.

But the other old texts say 3,300.

'eleph    a thousand  @,  as numeral

shaw-loshe'      three, triad  @, 3, 300, third

may-aw'        hundred  @, as simple number  @,  as part of larger number

There is no 2 in the other texts. So where did they get the 2 and why?

   

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Sorry to bother you, but where could I find this information. I've been looking online for it and can't seem to find it. Thanks

[Remnant]

The Vulgate is a Catholic Bible, created by Jerome. Its purpose was to counteract the King James bible. there is a bible war going on that few people realize. The NIV is the DEVIL's Bible. The King James is really the only true Bible. THe NIV removes key texts that relate to Jesus as the Lord and Savior...It well documented in the book by B.G. Wilkerson, "Our Authorized Vindicated".

here is a website for this book.

Our Authorized Vindicated

[wordsower]

Remnant.

I attended a church---briefly---that taught this nonsense about the KJV being the only version.

I prayed about it, studied up on it, and come to find out, the KJV is a very poor translation of the original Greek and Hebrew. If you work at all with a Strong's concordance it wont take long to see that.

My conviction is that the KJV is extremely difficult to understand and for that reason the devil would like nothing better than to keep people in a bible they can't understand.

I don't care for the NIV at all, myself, it is a poor translation, but the NKJV is good and the NAS is an almost perfect translation word for word.

Don't listen to every naysayer out there, be careful.

[apothanein kerdos]

Remnant.

I attended a church---briefly---that taught this nonsense about the KJV being the only version.

I prayed about it, studied up on it, and come to find out, the KJV is a very poor translation of the original Greek and Hebrew.  If you work at all with a Strong's concordance it wont take long to see that.

My conviction is that the KJV is extremely difficult to understand and for that reason the devil would like nothing better than to keep people in a bible they can't understand.

I don't care for the NIV at all, myself, it is a poor translation, but the NKJV is good and the NAS is an almost perfect translation word for word.

Don't listen to every naysayer out there, be careful.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Whoa back up now. First off, using a Strong's to determine the strength of a translation is not wise at all. It's a dictionary. That's like trying to use Webster's to see if Moby Dick is a literary work of art. You simply can't. A dictionary doesn't show you why a word is translated a certain way or anything else.

That being said, the King James is wonderfully translated but it not free from inadequacies and errors. Likewise it is archaic in its language. However, it is dishonest to say it is poorly translated when that simply is not the case.

[Remnantrob]

I'm still trying to find this discrepency of a 3300 day as opposed to the 2300 days. I was reading about masoretic text and how many Christians feel that it has a lot of errors in it. There might be other things in our bible that this text says is incorrect, but I'm gonna have to stick to what I know instead of the enigma of the masoretic. Thanks for your input though ave. btw you didn't get to answer my question.

My next question is about the 70th week. When you say that 3.5 years is to be completed Christ's ministry are you saying that Christ is coming back and going to minister to us? (This is an actual question I'm not trying to be/sound stupid) Thanks for the response in advance

\