Jump to content
IGNORED

"Able Danger" military unit


jacob

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  599
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,260
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,988
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Hummmm.... Hilary as president of the U.S., and Bill head of the U.N.

;) Now there is something to pray over......

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  276
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  7,474
  • Content Per Day:  0.96
  • Reputation:   51
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/25/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/31/1966

;)

I don't like the idea either, but unless someone can mount a campaign to rival hers, we may just be stuck with her.

Regardless, I think it's time to review my retirement options from the military in the next few years....... ;)

t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  31
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  04/06/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Greetings,

Although I should think it should be a very BIG story....you're all very right in saying this thing will probably "go away".

Have you noticed how cozy the Clinton's and Bush's have become? Hillary for 8 years, then either Chelsea or one of the twins? We can have a dynasty!! :(

Lord, Come Quickly!!

Your friend in Christ,

dotcom

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  203
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

How convenient for everyone to be talking about Hillary and the Clinton's, just to take everyone's mind off of any questionable events pertaining to 9/11. I know that nobody is possibly allowed to ever question dealings under this present administration. Why is the pentagon squashing all testimonies? :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  276
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  7,474
  • Content Per Day:  0.96
  • Reputation:   51
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  02/25/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/31/1966

How convenient for everyone to be talking about Hillary and the Clinton's, just to take everyone's mind off of any questionable events pertaining to 9/11.

Not true.

This is simply another point in the whole discussion of 9/11.

Which questionable event would you like to discuss?

t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  29
  • Topic Count:  599
  • Topics Per Day:  0.08
  • Content Count:  56,260
  • Content Per Day:  7.56
  • Reputation:   27,988
  • Days Won:  271
  • Joined:  12/29/2003
  • Status:  Offline

How convenient for everyone to be talking about Hillary and the Clinton's, just to take everyone's mind off of any questionable events pertaining to 9/11. I know that nobody is possibly allowed to ever question dealings under this present administration. Why is the pentagon squashing all testimonies?  :emot-prettywink:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I don't know how much time you spend here, but some of us discuss it all. there are many 9/11 threads that are still readable if you care to look through them. A few search terms have been blocked, but you can work around that if you are creative. Just about everything that could be said about 911 has been, and even those of us that are deep into conspriacy study got frustrated with it all.

Shoulda been here 18 months ago.... :(

btw, the testimonies are being quashed because of the severity of the subject, and most likely other things that were attached to that group,

Many of us here are very aware of the group so powerful and so far reaching that when you speak of them it should not be over a whisper. They spooked the president in 1917, and should not be taken lightly today, especially here where most are trying to spread the gospel of their mortal enemy. George nor the rest of us for that matter need the hassle. And hassle is only one of their tools.

So go with Georges request for he is the one to sholder the burdens of those illuminated ones should they get tired of us babbling about their business...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,823
  • Topics Per Day:  0.75
  • Content Count:  45,870
  • Content Per Day:  5.94
  • Reputation:   1,897
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Lt. Col. Mark Shaffer, a military intelligence officer who worked on Able Danger, was prepared to testify that three different times he tried to meet with the FBI to discuss the unit's findings, but was prevented from doing so because of legal concerns by department lawyers, according to Shaffer's lawyer, Mark Zaid, who testified on his behalf.

Well, I remember that it had been assessed the biggest problem with 9-11 was that the government agencies had the pieces but lacked the appropriate communication between them to put the pieces together.

From what I see here, it looks like this was just another part of that problem.

:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  733
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  3,017
  • Content Per Day:  0.43
  • Reputation:   128
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  01/01/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/09/1966

Hummmm....  Hilary as president of the U.S., and Bill head of the U.N.   

:noidea: Now there is something to pray over......

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Would that make Bill the First Lady? Where will he find the time? :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...