Joshua-777 Posted November 30, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 5 Topic Count: 410 Topics Per Day: 0.06 Content Count: 3,102 Content Per Day: 0.48 Reputation: 522 Days Won: 6 Joined: 10/19/2006 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/07/1984 Share Posted November 30, 2022 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omegaman 3.0 Posted November 30, 2022 Group: Graduated to Heaven Followers: 57 Topic Count: 1,546 Topics Per Day: 0.21 Content Count: 10,320 Content Per Day: 1.41 Reputation: 12,323 Days Won: 9 Joined: 04/15/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 11/05/1951 Share Posted November 30, 2022 Good job I think. My only reservation about it is the use of the long ending of Mark. It is not that some of us pick and choose which textual variants we like or don't like, but that we lack confidence that that particular passage was originally in the gospel, and therefore may not not properly be the word of God. I suspect that might have been an accidental inclusion. However, I "thumbs upped" the video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willa Posted December 1, 2022 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 68 Topic Count: 186 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 14,242 Content Per Day: 3.33 Reputation: 16,658 Days Won: 30 Joined: 08/14/2012 Status: Offline Share Posted December 1, 2022 Others of us avoid versions that omit Holy Scripture for any supposed reason. Thank you for using it, Joshua! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David1701 Posted December 1, 2022 Group: Royal Member Followers: 8 Topic Count: 15 Topics Per Day: 0.01 Content Count: 5,731 Content Per Day: 3.55 Reputation: 3,522 Days Won: 12 Joined: 11/27/2019 Status: Offline Share Posted December 1, 2022 On 11/30/2022 at 9:53 PM, Omegaman 3.0 said: Good job I think. My only reservation about it is the use of the long ending of Mark. It is not that some of us pick and choose which textual variants we like or don't like, but that we lack confidence that that particular passage was originally in the gospel, and therefore may not not properly be the word of God. I suspect that might have been an accidental inclusion. However, I "thumbs upped" the video. What??? Mark 16:9-20 is contained in the VAST MAJORITY of Greek manuscripts that contain Mark 16. There are only three Greek manuscripts that contain Mark 16 that do not have verses 16-20; whereas, there are at least several hundred that do, with slight variations. The two main manuscripts that omit verses 9-20 are Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, which disagree with each other, in the gospels alone, over 3,000 times; and they are of very dubious provenance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts