Schiff: Trump should be Disqualified for Office

[JimmyB]

23 minutes ago, George said:

So you don't hate Trump?  It's pretty apparent that you have a serious animosity toward him.     

Again: our discussion is finished!

[Sparks]

On 9/21/2023 at 12:44 AM, Slibhin said:

Trump has attacked George Soros and accused him of being part of a global cabal, a common antisemitic conspiracy theory/trope.

You mean the George Soros who was a self-admitted Nazi collaborator?  That George?

You might want to check out video interviews with George to see what he was up to during WWII, against his fellow Jews.  He tells you what he did.

[Still Alive]

I normally vote "against" a candidate in presidential elections. There are only two years I voted "for" a candidate. 

1980 - Ronald Reagan

2020 - Donald Trump.

Notice 1984 and 2016 are not on that list.

I'm hoping I get a chance in 2024 to vote "for" a candidate again, but I honestly believe there is surprisingly reasonable chance that we won't get to - vote at all, that is.

I read an article about the hong kong mayor vote once. The jist was that the powers that be don't need to "control" who wins. They only need to control who is nominated. Think Bernie Sanders. I was no fan, but I think the powers that be simply wanted Hillary. And I suspect they wanted Jeb Bush, but Trump sorta nixed that.

[Sparks]

1 hour ago, Slibhin said:

All that nonsense has been debunked. I don't care about your conspiracies.

How did they debunk the video interview(s) of him saying so? 

[Still Alive]

24 minutes ago, Sparks said:

How did they debunk the video interview(s) of him saying so? 

It's time people debunk the debunkers. 

I've discovered that when someone says something has been debunked, they need to offer evidence. Too many times it has not been "debunked". Rather, someone just made a case against it. You might as well say the defenses case debunked the prosecution's case. i.e. it might have, or it might not have.

[Sparks]

29 minutes ago, Still Alive said:

It's time people debunk the debunkers. 

I've discovered that when someone says something has been debunked, they need to offer evidence. Too many times it has not been "debunked". Rather, someone just made a case against it. You might as well say the defenses case debunked the prosecution's case. i.e. it might have, or it might not have.

The video I just saw was of Soros explaining that at age 14, he pretended to be a Christian with the help of his father and a friend of his father, and went he around taking the possessions of the Hungarian Jews along with the Nazis and had no guilt about it. 

His own lips are moving saying this so I doubt there was much valid debunking.

[Still Alive]

15 hours ago, Sparks said:

The video I just saw was of Soros explaining that at age 14, he pretended to be a Christian with the help of his father and a friend of his father, and went he around taking the possessions of the Hungarian Jews along with the Nazis and had no guilt about it. 

His own lips are moving saying this so I doubt there was much valid debunking.

Maybe they are arguing that "he changed". 

Which causes me to recall a conversation I had about 30 years ago in the hot tub at the Turtle Bay Inn on the north shore of Oahu. It went on for about two hours (the hot tub wasn't all that hot). 

He was an ex-Hitler youth. And WWII history is one of my hobbies so I got to ask him a lot of questions about what it was really like. At the end of that two hours it was pretty clear that he was very sorry that they lost and thinks it would be a better world if they had won. But he had come to grips with reality.

[Sparks]

7 minutes ago, Still Alive said:

Maybe they are arguing that "he changed". 

Which causes me to recall a conversation I had about 30 years ago in the hot tub at the Turtle Bay Inn on the north shore of Oahu. It went on for about two hours (the hot tub wasn't all that hot). 

He was an ex-Hitler youth. And WWII history is one of my hobbies so I got to ask him a lot of questions about what it was really like. At the end of that two hours it was pretty clear that he was very sorry that they lost and thinks it would be a better world if they had won. But he had come to grips with reality.

No doubt the Soros video employed a ventriloquist, or they claim that what he said was not what he really meant. 

I also knew a Nazi Youth who grew up to be a hair cutter, long ago.  He said being a part of that group was like being in the Boy Scouts, but I am sure he failed to mention it had racial undertones. 

[Still Alive]

4 hours ago, Sparks said:

No doubt the Soros video employed a ventriloquist, or they claim that what he said was not what he really meant. 

I also knew a Nazi Youth who grew up to be a hair cutter, long ago.  He said being a part of that group was like being in the Boy Scouts, but I am sure he failed to mention it had racial undertones. 

Yeah, it's just one of those "bad lip reading" videos. 

On your last sentence, have you seen the movie, Jo Jo Rabbit? It's a compelling comedy drama about a little boy that aspires to be a first class Hitler youth during the war in Berlin, and his mom is hiding a Jewish girl in the house. He also has an invisible friend he talks to all the time that we get to actually see. It's Hitler.

[Big Boy Stan Murf]

21 hours ago, Still Alive said:

It's time people debunk the debunkers. 

Yeah, the "Fact Checkers" are just saying what the powers that be behind the scenes (demons) are telling them to say

In Matthew 24 Jesus indicates that in the end times deception will be the biggest danger and of course He is right!

It's too bad so many Christians don't study God's Word enough to know when they are being deceived.