RustyAngeL Posted December 1, 2005 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 22 Topic Count: 155 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 7,464 Content Per Day: 1.01 Reputation: 8,810 Days Won: 57 Joined: 03/30/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/12/1952 Author Share Posted December 1, 2005 I was sitting watching Fox New Channel tonight with Sean Hannity and Allen Combs. They were interviewing Mike Farrell a notorious hollywood liberal who slammed President Bush for sending our military to war. As all of us are he is heartbroken over the loss of all our military, that's where he and I part company. He is speaking out against the impending execution of Stanley "Tookie" Williams on December 13th in California for the cold blooded murder of four innocent people. All were shot execution style in the back of the head with a shotgun. For these acts he was paid $400 Mr. Farrell was singing the praises of all he has done while in prison, writing nine childrens books about gang violence and even being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, are they kidding? Sean Hannity brought up and interesting point, why is hollywood so hot to trot to save this monsters life when anyone one of them would crawl buck naked down the middle of 5th AVE in NYC to defend a womans right to end the life of her unborn child. This makes no sense to want this man, who I might add has not been a model prisoner, raping other prisoners, assaulting guards, the list goes on and on to live while taking the lives of the unborn with no second thought. Just my opinion. JOHN 8:7:So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. (KJV) Matthew 6:14-15 14For if you forgive men when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15But if you do not forgive men their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins. "And early in the morning He came again into the Temple and all the people came unto Him; and He sat down, and taught them." "And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto Him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst, They say unto Him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. Now Moses in the Law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest Thou?" "This they said, tempting Him, that they might have to accuse Him." "But Jesus stooped down, and with His finger wrote on the ground, as though He heard them not. So when they continued asking Him, He lifted up Himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. And again He stooped down, and wrote on the ground." "And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst." "When Jesus had lifted up Himself, and saw none but the woman, He said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? Hath no man condemned thee?" "She said, No man, Lord." "And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more." (John 8:2-11 KJV) And your point is? no one is judging this man. The courts have already done that, and found him guilty of first degree murder four counts. He was sentenced to death. The people fighting to save this mans life are the same ones who are pro chioce. In other words save the the life of this man after he murdered four people but go ahead and murder unborn children. There is a huge difference. I didn't call for his mans death, that was decided by a jury,if were not going to carry out the will of the people why have trials? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apothanein kerdos Posted December 1, 2005 Group: Royal Member Followers: 1 Topic Count: 331 Topics Per Day: 0.05 Content Count: 8,713 Content Per Day: 1.20 Reputation: 21 Days Won: 0 Joined: 07/28/2004 Status: Offline Share Posted December 1, 2005 Whoever sheds man's blood, by man his blood shall be shed, for in the image of God He made man. It's called justice. If we use the passage refering to the adulterous woman then we could not condemn anyone or send anyone to prison. That passage is refering to actions within the church. The role of the government is to deliver justice, not grace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RustyAngeL Posted December 2, 2005 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 22 Topic Count: 155 Topics Per Day: 0.02 Content Count: 7,464 Content Per Day: 1.01 Reputation: 8,810 Days Won: 57 Joined: 03/30/2004 Status: Offline Birthday: 12/12/1952 Author Share Posted December 2, 2005 Whoever sheds man's blood, by man his blood shall be shed, for in the image of God He made man. It's called justice. If we use the passage refering to the adulterous woman then we could not condemn anyone or send anyone to prison. That passage is refering to actions within the church. The role of the government is to deliver justice, not grace. Amen and amen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts