Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I guess this is a good place to post my article:

I think it must first be acknowledged up front that I think current laws on border control are based on racist notions. Up until the 1970s, the US placed a cap on each individual nation, with European nations getting a higher per capita cap than other non-white nations. This is not hard to believe considering race relations were just beginning to smooth out during this time. We graduated to a general cap on immigration but, if we pay attention to per capita, we see that

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  112
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,489
  • Content Per Day:  0.46
  • Reputation:   13
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

^^^ Thank you!!! :thumbsup::(


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted
I think it must first be acknowledged up front that I think current laws on border control are based on racist notions. Up until the 1970s, the US placed a cap on each individual nation, with European nations getting a higher per capita cap than other non-white nations. This is not hard to believe considering race relations were just beginning to smooth out during this time. We graduated to a general cap on immigration but, if we pay attention to per capita, we see that

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  97
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,853
  • Content Per Day:  0.79
  • Reputation:   132
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/19/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/11/1911

Posted

perhaps discrimination is a more appropriate word. :thumbsup:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I think it must first be acknowledged up front that I think current laws on border control are based on racist notions. Up until the 1970s, the US placed a cap on each individual nation, with European nations getting a higher per capita cap than other non-white nations. This is not hard to believe considering race relations were just beginning to smooth out during this time. We graduated to a general cap on immigration but, if we pay attention to per capita, we see that


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

But can you prove that is race?

US and Canada traditionally have more comradary than Mexico.

There is more to the issue than the "color of their skin".

As your post above pointed out, the issue in question was income level, not skin tone.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
But can you prove that is race?

US and Canada traditionally have more comradary than Mexico.

There is more to the issue than the "color of their skin".

As your post above pointed out, the issue in question was income level, not skin tone.

And just why have Canada and the US had more comradary? Mexico has more natural resources and more ability to trade...the reason being is that Canadians were from Anglo-Saxon backgrounds (or French). We cannot ignore this early important fact in how our policy towards both developed. I find it amazing that people are trying to ignore the fact that our foriegn policy, up until about twenty to fifty years ago, was based on racist notions.

I mean, I'm sitting here showing you that white nations get more in per capita than non-white nations do...and you're saying that has nothing to do with race? :)


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  10
  • Topic Count:  5,869
  • Topics Per Day:  0.72
  • Content Count:  46,509
  • Content Per Day:  5.72
  • Reputation:   2,259
  • Days Won:  83
  • Joined:  03/22/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/19/1970

Posted

How many wars did we fight against Canada? How many wars did we fight against Mexico?

That has nothing to do with US-Mexico relations?

WWI the first time Brittain, France and the US can be found fighting on the same side - was Mexico one of the Allies?

(Speaking of, were Brittain and France's contention with each other for centuries a race issue?)

Are you truly claiming that skin color was the sole source of tensions vs. comradary?

What about the Irish? They are white, yet they sure got the bad end of the comradary stick.

As for per capita income, Mexico used to be a weathy, powerful nation. What happened to change that? Racial tension?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  97
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,853
  • Content Per Day:  0.79
  • Reputation:   132
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/19/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  08/11/1911

Posted

ummm... I believe if what I see on the boards is true, it is easier for mexicans to get across the border than it is for Canadians. :)


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
How many wars did we fight against Canada? How many wars did we fight against Mexico?

That has nothing to do with US-Mexico relations?

Why do you think we went to war with Mexico and not Canada? Canada, being owned by the British, was a much better target. Yet we chose to eradicate the Mexicans from land that they had occupied for hundreds of years because...well...they were Mexicans. We did the same thing with the Native Americans. It was all driven by ethnocentric (racist) views.

WWI the first time Brittain, France and the US can be found fighting on the same side - was Mexico one of the Allies?

Of course not, we invaded them and took their land only about 60 years before...long enough for some of the people to remember thus affecting foriegn policy. likewise, where was the US in the first three years of both world wars? We only fought because we were drawn into it.

Are you truly claiming that skin color was the sole source of tensions vs. comradary?

Uh...yeah. That's kind of historical fact.

As for per capita income, Mexico used to be a weathy, powerful nation. What happened to change that? Racial tension?

We invaded them and set up a puppet government. Likewise, it was a rich and powerful colony and once it gained freedom poverty began to run rampant.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 14 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...