why did we let this punk into our country?

[O'Dannyboy]

I had little against Bush untill he defended the ports deal and started pushing for amnesty. I don't bother myself with who or why we got into Iraq but I don't think it's our responsibility to fund the creation of democracies around the globe. I understand it's our responsibility to fix what we broke but I didn't understand we were going to wind up trying to build a democratic nation from scratch. Some people put the blame for the entire Iraq conflict on Bushs' shoulders and I think in doing so they give him far too much credit. Simply put, my biggest problem with Bush is his sudden lean to the left. I know many will disagree with me on this but thats what I feel.

[forrestkc]

We let lying, adulterous Clinton stay, but we should boot Christian Bush out........hmmm........

Are you saying that Clinton is not a Christian? His faith could be stronger than Bush's faith is, neither you nor I nor anyone else on here would know either way. I will say that most historians would consider Jimmy Carter to have been our most deeply religious president, yet few would consider him to be a very good President. I think Bush is a Christian, but any president can finish his speeches with God Bless America. After all, its just words isn

Edited September 21, 2006 by forrestkc

[dgolvach]

I don't like every thing Bush does and I liked almost nothing Clinton stood for but I feel we are very weak to allow these 2 filthy rotten America hating dictators to come in and diss any president and have a forum to spew their puke. I have changed my mind about what Pat Robertson said about Chavez. I will NEVER BUY ANYTHING FROM CITCO AGAIN! What were we thinking!

Dan

Dictators eh, Chavez was elected in a democratic election, a much clearer victory than Bush 2000. Ahmadinejad was also elected albeit after having been deemed eligible to stand by a panel of Mullahs, the election itself was strongly contested. Anywat the point about the UN is that whilst within the USA it is neutral territory, open to all.

Clearly your not a big fan of free speech.

Hey Amor...why don't you go to Iran and test out your free speech theory. Make sure you have a good life insurance policy for your folks back home. There is a difference between free speech and allowing an sworn enemy into your country. We probably should expel the UN because they are right there with these 2 devils. If you think these guys are keeping power with free elections, your in la la land. In the US, Cindy Sheehan is allowed to go to the Presidents front yard and call him names that I cant repeat on this board. I support her freedom to do so. You go try this in front of these 2 Jew hating dictators homes. Please just go try it!

Regards

Dan

[Spunky]

Nice job this is exactly why Chavez came to our country lol

to insight more people to go Bush bashing instead of focus-

ing on the fact Chavez is the most likely future of his country.

Chavez is aligning himself with such people that are just as

vile as he is like the president of Iran whom insists the holo-

caust didn't happen, hmm Yeah these are just the type of

people that U.S. colleges and churches should be inviting to

speak about inequalities lol.

Atleast here we can say as we like as one person already

pointed out we go visit their countries and try to speak our

minds and oops we're dead!

It's one thing when we as Americans get up and bash our own

leadership that's what we pride ourselves in having that prive-

ledge unlike most countries, but to allow other leaders show how

hypocritrical they are by not even allowing their own people to

do the same yet take advantage of our country's priveledge and

target our leader.

God Bless!

[dgolvach]

Nice job this is exactly why Chavez came to our country lol

to insight more people to go Bush bashing instead of focus-

ing on the fact Chavez is the most likely future of his country.

Chavez is aligning himself with such people that are just as

vile as he is like the president of Iran whom insists the holo-

caust didn't happen, hmm Yeah these are just the type of

people that U.S. colleges and churches should be inviting to

speak about inequalities lol.

Atleast here we can say as we like as one person already

pointed out we go visit their countries and try to speak our

minds and oops we're dead!

It's one thing when we as Americans get up and bash our own

leadership that's what we pride ourselves in having that prive-

ledge unlike most countries, but to allow other leaders show how

hypocritrical they are by not even allowing their own people to

do the same yet take advantage of our country's priveledge and

target our leader.

God Bless!

This is what makes me so sick. These devils are using the very freedoms we have (that they would never allow in their own countries) against us. I an aware that the UN ( useless nations) is a neutral location. However, you have to go through US territory to get there. Chavez made one statement that I agree with. Get this Jew Hating, anti-American, dictator promoting, " (bad word)" organization out of the US. NOW!

Dan

[dgolvach]

Let's see in the race for lie for lie and criminal act for criminal act I believe George W. Bush would win hands down. Whether or not someone has received oral sex outside of their marriage doesn't make them a good leader. It makes them a lousy spouse but has no bearing on their ability to function as President.

We let lying, adulterous Clinton stay, but we should boot Christian Bush out........hmmm........

The abortion issue alone makes Clinton a bigger criminal if you believe that abortion is murder. 3 million yearly thanks to like-minded politicans and activist who love Clinton. This includes republicans who think its not criminal to sacrifice children to the God of conveinance. This is no act of war.

Dan

[forrestkc]

Let's see in the race for lie for lie and criminal act for criminal act I believe George W. Bush would win hands down. Whether or not someone has received oral sex outside of their marriage doesn't make them a good leader. It makes them a lousy spouse but has no bearing on their ability to function as President.

We let lying, adulterous Clinton stay, but we should boot Christian Bush out........hmmm........

The abortion issue alone makes Clinton a bigger criminal if you believe that abortion is murder. 3 million yearly thanks to like-minded politicans and activist who love Clinton. This includes republicans who think its not criminal to sacrifice children to the God of conveinance. This is no act of war.

Dan

You do realize that while the Abortion rate went up under Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr, it went down dramatically under Clinton. In fact, it went down 13% durring Clinton's first term and 5% under his second. If you want less abortions, which everyone does I would think, then the best way is to have less unwanted pregancies. Lower poverty rates and better education is a big part of that equation. Even if we were to completely ban abortion, which is very unlikely, we would then be faced with the problem of what kind of social systems would need to be inplace to deal with all the children resulting from those unwanted pregancies. Thus, the key here is that the solution lies in reducing unwanted pregnancies.

Edited September 21, 2006 by forrestkc

[dgolvach]

Let's see in the race for lie for lie and criminal act for criminal act I believe George W. Bush would win hands down. Whether or not someone has received oral sex outside of their marriage doesn't make them a good leader. It makes them a lousy spouse but has no bearing on their ability to function as President.

We let lying, adulterous Clinton stay, but we should boot Christian Bush out........hmmm........

The abortion issue alone makes Clinton a bigger criminal if you believe that abortion is murder. 3 million yearly thanks to like-minded politicans and activist who love Clinton. This includes republicans who think its not criminal to sacrifice children to the God of conveinance. This is no act of war.

Dan

You do realize that while the Abortion rate went up under Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr, it went down dramatically under Clinton. In fact, it went down 13% durring Clinton's first term and 5% under his second. If you want less abortions, which everyone does I would think, then the best way is to have less unwanted pregancies. Lower poverty rates and better education is a big part of that equation. Even if we were to completely ban abortion, which is very unlikely, we would then be faced with the problem of what kind of social systems would need to be inplace to deal with all the children resulting from those unwanted pregancies. Thus, the key here is that the solution lies in reducing unwanted pregnancies.

Perhaps so but that has nothing to do with their policys. It has everything to do with the judges they appoint if it comes up during their time in office. As far as birth control, again it was the Clintonian idea of free love and 60s style free sex ( if you can't be with the one you love...(Hillary)love the one your with (Monica)that has made us in-part a country of breeders instead of family builders. Why should God be on the side of any nation that allows this? I believe its the percentage of God fearing folks that understand that innocent life in the womb is a gift from God, is what keeps us from his total wrath.

Dan

[billie]

You do realize that while the Abortion rate went up under Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr, it went down dramatically under Clinton.

You do realize that despite what Congress wanted, Clinton kept partial-birth abortion legal.

[forrestkc]

Very well put. Nice to meet you, Forrestkc.

God bless!

Thank you, nice meeting you as well. I have to apologize here, but after reading some of the posts on various current events on here, I just have to get my 2 cents worth out.

It