Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  73
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,663
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
55Many women were there, watching from a distance. They had followed Jesus from Galilee to care for his needs. 56Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedee's sons.

Yeah, that is another obvious one.

Not sure what you mean, artsylady. What is obvious and why/how???

I'll bold the obvious part. Why it's obvious is because why would they call Mary the mother of James and Joses unless she was their mother. Somehow, no offense, but I think you'll come up with a very complicated answer for this.

Funny, I think this makes MY case. Obviously, this was a different Mary, or else the writer would have said, "the mother of Jesus".

  • Replies 648
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  171
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,813
  • Content Per Day:  0.61
  • Reputation:   150
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/26/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Funny, I think this makes MY case. Obviously, this was a different Mary, or else the writer would have said, "the mother of Jesus".

If you're right, then Mary the mother of Jesus q) wasn't mentioned as being at the crucifixion, or b) was there but the writer felt she wasn't significant enough to even mention.

I think it's pretty obvious that this woman was the same woman mentioned as the mother of Jesus, because the verse speaks of women already known to readers and the only other Mary was Mary Magdeline who is also mentioned.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  73
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,663
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
You misunderstand my point. What I am saying is that there is no one but Jesus who is specifically referred to as "the son of Mary".

I'm not speaking to the term brother of Jesus here, but specifically---"son of Mary" .

When was he specifically called the 'son of Mary' except for during the time of his birth? Actually, I'd like to examine every verse that he's called the 'son of Mary' if you don't mind.

This leaves two other possibilities. The term "adelphos" is used in one of its other common usages i.e. cousin or other relative or close friend. Or Joseph was a widower who had children from a prior marriage.

I'm not sure why you would come to any conclusions like the above because Jesus was ever called the 'son of Mary'.

I'm curious. Why is it so important to you that Mary was not a perpetual virgin??
?

Honestly it wouldn't matter if she remained a virgin or not. I could not care either way. But there would have to be SOME verses or at least ONE verse to state this in order for me to beleive it. Otherwise, why would I?

It sure seems to me that based on the verses we do have, she went on and had more children.

Please show me even one verse where it calls someone "son of Mary" other than Jesus.

Mt 2:11 They were overjoyed at seeing the star, and on entering the house they saw the child with Mary his mother

Mt 13:55 Is he not the carpenter's son? Is not his mother named Mary

Mk 6:3 Is he not the carpenter, the son of Mary

Luke 2:34 and Simeon blessed them and said to Mary his mother, "Behold, this child is destined for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be contradicted

Acts 1:14 and Mary the mother of Jesus


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  73
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,663
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
I don't know who Alan Shreck is, but he's not one of the writers of the Bible.

There are however, verses in the Bible forbidding us to contact the dead.

Saints in heaven aren't dead--they are alive in and with Christ! Alleluia!

Who do you think God warned us against contacting?

Those who were physically dead. How else would we be able to contact anyone unless they were somehow alive. In any case, it's forbidden. I think you're avoiding the reality of God's command. He was clear that we should not contact the dead. And He didn't mean 'spiritually dead'. He meant 'physically dead'.

Could you please cite the Scripture references for contacting the dead? Thanks.

Jesus talked with Moses and Elijah. :emot-heartbeat:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  171
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,813
  • Content Per Day:  0.61
  • Reputation:   150
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/26/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Please show me even one verse where it calls someone "son of Mary" other than Jesus.

Sorry, I meant to say other than at Jesus birth. Anyway.

Mt 2:11 They were overjoyed at seeing the star, and on entering the house they saw the child with Mary his mother

Reads, "On coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary and they bowed down and worshipped HIM. . Then they opened their treasures and presented HIM with gifts of gold and of incense and of myrhh".

I'm not sure why I even asked who called Mary the mother of Jesus. I can't remember where I might have been going with that because we all do agree Mary was Jesus earthly mother.

:emot-heartbeat: Long day. Anyway, notice there is no mention of any kind of special treatment to Mary at all, only Jesus.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  73
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,663
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
I think I'll give up on this thread. People will see what they want to see.

No offense to anyone but I dont care to debate with beleivers on anything unless a person is willing to open up mind and consider that they might be wrong.

:emot-heartbeat: I'd rather just concentrate on reaching those who don't believe.

Fair enough. Not everyone enjoys debate.

I'm not close-minded, artsylady, I'm right. :th_praying:

Love,

Fiosh

:emot-heartbeat:


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  73
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,663
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Regarding the wine and bread turning into Jesus body and blood. In this day of advanced medical science it would be very easy to prove this concept if it were true. Why doesn't the Vatican pay to have this study done, to show the actual physical change from wine to blood when it enters a human being? Obviously it doesn't change when it hits the persons mouth because it still tastes like wine, but if this reaction really did take place (in the stomach, intestines?) it could be proven quite easily.

Now, you do agree that Jesus used many metaphors, that were just symbolism right?

One more to think about. No response needed. I only rewrote it because if you're honest with yourself you didn't come close to answering the question. You sidestepped it with a very lengthy answer though.

I didn't side step it at all. I gave a thorough answer to a good question.

If you want a simple answer, then.....

Yes, Jesus used metaphors, but not in this case.

No, you can not prove Real Presence scientifically. I accept it by faith.

Peace,

F


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  73
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,663
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Funny, I think this makes MY case. Obviously, this was a different Mary, or else the writer would have said, "the mother of Jesus".

If you're right, then Mary the mother of Jesus q) wasn't mentioned as being at the crucifixion, or b) was there but the writer felt she wasn't significant enough to even mention.

I think it's pretty obvious that this woman was the same woman mentioned as the mother of Jesus, because the verse speaks of women already known to readers and the only other Mary was Mary Magdeline who is also mentioned.

It's important to look at all of Scripture and not pick and choose verses.

It makes no sense to me that Jesus is hanging on the cross and yet the writer would refer to His mother as "the mother of James and Joseph", or something similar. That's imcomprehensible to me!

Notice in Matthew the "mother of James and Joseph" is mentioned; and in John the "wife of Clophas" is mentioned as Mary's cousin. If these are the same person, and it's a good chance that they are, that would make James and Joseph Jesus' cousins---adelphos.

Also, note that the Gospel writers refer to these other Mary's as "women who has followed Jesus from Galilee", and as those who were "standing at a distance; hardly a description that would be given to Jesus' very mother!

Now note in John that the Blessed Mother is "Standing by the cross of Jesus ", and is referred to as "his mother".

Nope, those other Mary's are not the mother of Jesus. She was right there under the cross.

God bless,

Fiosh

:emot-heartbeat:

Matt 27: 55

There were many women there, looking on from a distance, who had followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering to him.

56

Among them were Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee.

Mark 15:40

There were also women looking on from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of the younger James and of Joses, and Salome.

41

These women had followed him when he was in Galilee and ministered to him. There were also many other women who had come up with him to Jerusalem.

Luke 23: 47 The centurion who witnessed what had happened glorified God and said, "This man was innocent beyond doubt."

48

When all the people who had gathered for this spectacle saw what had happened, they returned home beating their breasts;

49

but all his acquaintances stood at a distance, including the women who had followed him from Galilee and saw these events.

John 19: 25

Standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary of Magdala.

26

When Jesus saw his mother 11 and the disciple there whom he loved, he said to his mother, "Woman, behold, your son."

27

Then he said to the disciple, "Behold, your mother." And from that hour the disciple took her into his home.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  73
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,663
  • Content Per Day:  0.50
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/20/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Please show me even one verse where it calls someone "son of Mary" other than Jesus.

Sorry, I meant to say other than at Jesus birth. Anyway.

Mt 2:11 They were overjoyed at seeing the star, and on entering the house they saw the child with Mary his mother

Reads, "On coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary and they bowed down and worshipped HIM. . Then they opened their treasures and presented HIM with gifts of gold and of incense and of myrhh".

I'm not sure why I even asked who called Mary the mother of Jesus. I can't remember where I might have been going with that because we all do agree Mary was Jesus earthly mother.

:emot-heartbeat: Long day. Anyway, notice there is no mention of any kind of special treatment to Mary at all, only Jesus.

That's one we agree on ----worship is for God alone! Amen!

[side note to "man"---notice the kings bow down and worship the Baby Jesus--fully God and fully man--Jesus in the flesh.]


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  15
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  204
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/29/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  03/07/1949

Posted

Hi Fiosh.

As a matter of interest if you were excommunicated from the RC church for any reason, would you consider yourself as still having any future left with God?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...