Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  12
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  66
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   1
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/19/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Dealing with nature and free will is certainly metaphysics.

I'm confused - how would animals killing animals be a "natural sin?" I'm not sure whether I'd agree or disagree, but I'd like to consider it further, so some elaboration would be awesome. Thanks!

I'm not sure if the following has anything to do with animals killing animals, but that's how I'm understanding it. Is it, how do you understand it?

Genesis 9:5 And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man.

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Dealing with nature and free will is certainly metaphysics.

I'm confused - how would animals killing animals be a "natural sin?" I'm not sure whether I'd agree or disagree, but I'd like to consider it further, so some elaboration would be awesome. Thanks!

Metaphysics, in a philosophical and ethical sense, refers to first causes unbeknownst to scientific thought or the different types of reality. The term comes from the works of Aristotle because it's found after his lectures on Physics, hence meta(Greek for "after) - physics. In this work he speaks of the first cause of everything (first part of the meaning of metaphysics) and then brought this to the "unmoved mover," or the first cause of everything who was completely transcendent and could not have a relationship with us (refer to Aristotle's Ethics...this also meets the second criteria).

A proper term would be "super natural" or "cognitive" or "ontology (nature of being). Using metaphysics, a term that discusses origins and different levels of what is real, is not proper to describe the entire debate on harmatology and man's ability to will on his own. Though any good discussion on either will include some metaphysical background, most of it will deal with ontological levels - is man constricted, does sin truly exist, is sin a make up of the mind, is there truly a morality, etc.

As for how animals killing each other is a "natural sin," theologically all of creation is living in sin, not just humans. This therefore puts the entire system out of whack. We look to natural selection and realize the entire purpose is completley anti-God. Note that it is supposedly rids the least effective species null and void, thus destroying part of God's creation. In the Bible we are told to look after the weak. The reason for this is that nature, in its fallen state, is prone to only seek after the powerful - this is why many philosophers, such as Nietzche or Plato's character Thrasymachus in The Republic, believe that the most powerful man will/should always have power - which is decidedly against God's original plan. This is natural evil/sin, that which occurs naturally without man's advancements. Everyone speaks of how humans cause evil to the enviroment but we often overlook the fact that evil already occurs within the enviroment. Do you believe that entropy is truly part of God's plan? Do you believe that God is pleased when a lion must eat a gazelle for its own survival? How could God be pleased when His creation is constantly at war with itself?

Romans 8 speaks of how this world is groaning because of sin, not because man sins, but because it is also encased in sin. This is what I mean by "natural sin."


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  30
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,234
  • Content Per Day:  0.16
  • Reputation:   7
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/17/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/10/1987

Posted

Interesting thoughts about nature.

By the way, ontology is indeed a more specific term which applies here, but it's also a subdiscipline of metaphysics. Just saying.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  13
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  1,981
  • Content Per Day:  0.28
  • Reputation:   3
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  05/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/20/1964

Posted

The darwinian view does not include the concept of sin to begin with, but even if it did...Some branches of darwinianism teaches that each person evolves through stages like those the 'ancestors' went through and then each generation is more evolved and developed than the previous one, at least in some miniscule amount which might not be noticable but still might exist.

Therefore theoretically, we might not have evolved past our sin nature, however we're supposedly better than our predecessors and thus, theoretically, if evolution allowed for the concept of sin we could over a period of time evolve past it, though progress would seem immeasurable, much like our progress in other areas...

(Frankly this is bunk. My mother had mental problems, but in many other ways she was a superior person to me)


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Interesting thoughts about nature.

By the way, ontology is indeed a more specific term which applies here, but it's also a subdiscipline of metaphysics. Just saying.

Not always. Whereas metaphysical deals with the first cause of reality and different types of reality, ontologly deals mostly with the make up of things within that reality. Ontology deals with the specific physical results, such as what is observable and what is thinkable, and therefore sin falls into this category, not into the broad realm of metaphysics. By declaring it a metaphysical problem you essentially place it as an "extra-world" problem and one that is above us that invades our reality. Sin resulted from man and therefore is on the same metaphysical plane of existence, manifesting itself in the physical world through its birth through cognitive thought - therefore, it makes no sense to call it a metaphysical problem when it is clearly a subset of ontology.


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  99
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   2
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/17/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  02/05/1947

Posted
An English naturalist named Charles Darwin published a book about evolution. Darwin said that God did not create the living world as we know it and as the Bible says. Darwin believed that all living things developed somehow over vast ages of time. He said that invertebrates like insects and jullyfish slowly turned into invertebrates like fish, lizards, and horses. He said that there were no people at first, but then some tree-dwelling, monkeylike creatures with tails, hairy bodies, and pointed ears gradually developed into people. - Understanding God's World by Laurel Hicks and Dawn Mereness

Now, could someone please explain to me if this is true (which it's not) then why hasn't man developed (evolved) past our sinful nature?


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  78
  • Content Per Day:  0.01
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
An English naturalist named Charles Darwin published a book about evolution. Darwin said that God did not create the living world as we know it and as the Bible says. Darwin believed that all living things developed somehow over vast ages of time. He said that invertebrates like insects and jullyfish slowly turned into invertebrates like fish, lizards, and horses. He said that there were no people at first, but then some tree-dwelling, monkeylike creatures with tails, hairy bodies, and pointed ears gradually developed into people. - Understanding God's World by Laurel Hicks and Dawn Mereness

Now, could someone please explain to me if this is true (which it's not) then why hasn't man developed (evolved) past our sinful nature?

What affects evolution is the success of a particular individual to pass on its genes. Any variance in that gene- for example those caused by mutations- may result in a change in phenotype (e.g. faster, stronger, better camoflage, etc).

Assuming the change in phenotype is for the better (those that are for the worse tend to die out) then the indiviual is more likely to have successful offspring- which continues the genes etc etc. I'm guessing you already know this.

Man hasn't 'evolved' past Sin since Sin doesn't usually affect our capacity to breed or find a mate- otherwise large sections of our population would now be wondering around partnerless & childless.

If something doesn't affect the breeding or survival of an individual it won't be affected by evolution. Hence Sin is unaffected by the process.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  232
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/05/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted (edited)
An English naturalist named Charles Darwin published a book about evolution. Darwin said that God did not create the living world as we know it and as the Bible says.

Not to nit-pic, but....

Darwin wrote "Origin of Species" (I think his original title was "On the Origin of Species", actually.) I have a copy at home I bought while in high school in the 70's. He never said that God did not create the world, all he was doing was trying to prove that living things 'evolve'. I have read his book, and I am not so sure he intended a "Science verses Religion" argument.

I also don't think he proved evolution, he DID prove natural selection, but not evolution.

Edited by Pizzaguy

  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
I don't think this is exactly right. It seems from the Bible that sin started with satan, and not Adam and Eve. satan is certainly part of creation, and one wicked spirit, but that's about all we know about the rascal.

In a technical sense you are correct (though he still exists on the same metaphysical level as we do). On the other hand, note how Romans 8 (I think) states how sin entered creation through man. THus, though Satan was the originator of rebellion, man was the "perfector" of it and it then spread to creation through our sin.

You are correct that it is a paradox...however it "originated" from man (we were not inherently sinful but did cause the first sin within this world) because we wanted to be autonomous from God.


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  7
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  232
  • Content Per Day:  0.03
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/05/2006
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
The fact that there are extinctions proves natural selection, in its most basic premise anyway.

Evolution however, is another matter entirely.

:thumbsup:

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...