Jump to content
IGNORED

Kennedy and Health Care


Recommended Posts

Posted

The following story can be found at: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070110/ap_on_...ennedy_health_3

WASHINGTON - The federal government should join the state of Massachusetts in enacting universal health coverage, said Sen. Edward Kennedy (news, bio, voting record), the new chairman of the Senate committee with jurisdiction over numerous health issues.

Kennedy's home state is the first to require everyone to have health insurance, just as drivers must have automobile coverage.

Kennedy has his own version of what universal health coverage would look like. He wants to extend Medicare to all. In his first hearing Wednesday as chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, the Massachusetts Democrat called on 10 witnesses from all over the country to talk about how to make health care more affordable.


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,464
  • Content Per Day:  0.96
  • Reputation:   8,810
  • Days Won:  57
  • Joined:  03/30/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/12/1952

Posted

I'm not saying that this is the answer I just wish I could get some kind of coverage. I have not had a mammogram in over 15 years. Why should a illegal get it and not me. They had better do something or a lot of Americans are going to die because of lack of coverage. If we stopped all benefits for these illegals I think the influx would slow down. We are rewarding them for breaking the law.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I don't like the idea of nationalized healthcare, but there are a lot of misconceptions floating around about it.

Our neighbors in Canada by any statistical measure get better healthcare than we do. Yes, they have longer waits for elective procedures.

However, they have:

A longer life expectancy than we do.

A higher early diagnosis rate and survival rate from cancer than we do.

Much better preventative medicine than we get.

A much lower infant mortality rate than we have.

By every measure, Canadians are statistically healthier than we are in America.

The statistics, right out of the CIA World Fact Book.

United States:

Infant Mortality Rate - 6.43 Deaths per 1000 Live Births

Life Expectancy - 77.85 years

HIV Prevalence Rate - 0.6%

Canada:

Infant Mortality Rate - 4.69 Deaths per 1000 Live Births

Life Expectancy - 80.22 years

HIV Prevalence Rate - 0.3%

https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ca.html

By every measure, Canadians enjoy better healthcare than we do.

Posted
I'm not saying that this is the answer I just wish I could get some kind of coverage. I have not had a mammogram in over 15 years. Why should a illegal get it and not me. They had better do something or a lot of Americans are going to die because of lack of coverage. If we stopped all benefits for these illegals I think the influx would slow down. We are rewarding them for breaking the law.

I am in total agreement with not paying for non citizens. But take it one step further one of the big arguements in favor of this insurance is that malpractice suits could be limited against both doctors and hospitals. We all hear that malpractice insurance is what is driving up the cost but the issue should be quality medical care over lawsuits...and certainly freedom of choice in who we use as our medical providers.

As far as those who have no medical insurance (I by choice am one of those), it is a dilemna because we are faced with paying horrid medical and pharmacutical costs when we are ill. In looking over my wife's medical and pharmacuetical bills from last year (which were covered) her pharmaceutical bill was just under $30,000 and doctors and misc amounted to just under $10,000. This is but a drop in the bucket compared to others i have heard about.

The proble is do we sacrifice quality care for coverage? The democrats have yet to come up with an acceptable plan. I won't support any plan until i am convinced it works and will not have to as another poster stated wait in line..or wait to get surgery in a line. If i need healthcare, i need it now..not when it is convenient for the government to schedule it. If i am short, my doctors have always been agreeable to being paid as i could.


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  22
  • Topic Count:  155
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  7,464
  • Content Per Day:  0.96
  • Reputation:   8,810
  • Days Won:  57
  • Joined:  03/30/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/12/1952

Posted

I'm not saying that this is the answer I just wish I could get some kind of coverage. I have not had a mammogram in over 15 years. Why should a illegal get it and not me. They had better do something or a lot of Americans are going to die because of lack of coverage. If we stopped all benefits for these illegals I think the influx would slow down. We are rewarding them for breaking the law.

I am in total agreement with not paying for non citizens. But take it one step further one of the big arguments in favor of this insurance is that malpractice suits could be limited against both doctors and hospitals. We all hear that malpractice insurance is what is driving up the cost but the issue should be quality medical care over lawsuits...and certainly freedom of choice in who we use as our medical providers.

As far as those who have no medical insurance (I by choice am one of those), it is a dilemna because we are faced with paying horrid medical and pharmacutical costs when we are ill. In looking over my wife's medical and pharmacuetical bills from last year (which were covered) her pharmaceutical bill was just under $30,000 and doctors and misc amounted to just under $10,000. This is but a drop in the bucket compared to others i have heard about.

The proble is do we sacrifice quality care for coverage? The democrats have yet to come up with an acceptable plan. I won't support any plan until i am convinced it works and will not have to as another poster stated wait in line..or wait to get surgery in a line. If i need healthcare, i need it now..not when it is convenient for the government to schedule it. If i am short, my doctors have always been agreeable to being paid as i could.

I'm in total agreement. However what happens to women may come down with something and cannot get it taken care of until it's to late? I'm not like a woman I know who says that she is not going to get cancer because she doesn't want it. My husband had cancer, so it's like he asked for it. This is a situation that needs to be addressed. I need medical insurance and to have to pay for people breaking the law being here while I'm turned down is just plain immoral. How can we call this a country of laws when we reward the law brakers? Good point Steve :)


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Our neighbors in Canada by any statistical measure get better healthcare than we do. Yes, they have longer waits for elective procedures.

The experts on the issue will definitely disagree with you. In fact, a certain prime minister of Canada brought his wife to America to obtain health care because of their sloppy, government medical system. The fact is, socialized medical care does not work. It has been proven over and over. When I was employed in the ER in Alex Bay on the St. Lawrence River, on the Canadian border, Canadians would flock over the border to obtain their health care. The Canadian nurses would come over the border to work in the American Hospital because they loathed their own medical system. Wherever you have a socialized medical system you have a chaotic medical care system.

Then why do they have higher life expectancies, lower infant mortality rates, lower HIV rates, and lower cancer death rates than their American counterparts?

I am not saying the Canadian System is perfect. I am not saying we should adopt it. I am saying that statistically, by any measure Canadians are healthier. I have never met a single Canadian that would trade their system for ours either. In fact, they talk about our system up there as something that should be avoided just like we talk about their system.

Those are CIA World Fact Book Statistics. How can you argue with that?

Their are experts on either side of this issue, it just depends on what lobbying firm they work for.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  811
  • Topics Per Day:  0.11
  • Content Count:  7,338
  • Content Per Day:  1.02
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  10/06/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I have some experience with the wacky world of Canadian healthcare. I was once in the big town of Wawa,Ontario, fishing with my dad and hurt myself, as I am prone to do. The hospital, in Sault Ste. Marie, hours away as I recall, was old, there were holes in the sheets, it smelled bad and so on. In fact, it reminded me of the worst VA hospital here. The equipment was old and some of it was not working. I remember dad telling the doctor to patch me up, that he would drive across the border to Soo Ste. Marie, MI to what he called "a real hospital."

So, I don't know. Four of the five doctors who worked on me after my injuries were ex-patriot Canadians who were fed up with OHIP, or whatever it was called.

The American system is really bad, but I'll take it compared to what our friends up north have.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  114
  • Topics Per Day:  0.02
  • Content Count:  4,015
  • Content Per Day:  0.56
  • Reputation:   8
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
I am not saying the Canadian System is perfect. I am not saying we should adopt it. I am saying that statistically, by any measure Canadians are healthier. I have never met a single Canadian that would trade their system for ours either. In fact, they talk about our system up there as something that should be avoided just like we talk about their system.

I am talking from personal experience from both sides of the issue. There are just as many, if not more, unhealthy Canadians because of their inadequare health care system, as there are unhealthy Americans not caused be a faulty health care system. It depends upon who takes the poll, and who was polled, and the demographics.

Those are CIA World Fact Book Statistics. How can you argue with that?

And the CIA World Fact Book statistics has nothing to do with a health care system. Many demographics enter into why one group of people fit the criteria you mentioned over another group of people in the same manner that Afro Americans are subject to Sickle Cell Disease; whereas white Americans are not. You are comparing apple to oranges here.

Sickle Cell???? Come on.

By every standard, there is no other country in the entire world that's society is more like ours than Canada. Canada may as well be another state. Moreover, this is not just the case with Canada. We rank 16th in the world on these statistics, every nation in front of us has Nationalized Healthcare.

I am not saying that it is a system we should adopt, I am just saying that it is not nearly as black and white as you are portraying it. I might add that Canada has a colder climate, a very diverse population just like ours, even higher imigration rates than we do, and a larger percentage of smokers, yet still statistically they get better healthcare.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  1,360
  • Topics Per Day:  0.20
  • Content Count:  7,866
  • Content Per Day:  1.16
  • Reputation:   26
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  11/22/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  04/18/1946

Posted

I'm shuddering as I remember Hillerycare that they tried so hard to shove down our throats. But even her own party wouldn't do it. That's how we were saved from it.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 14 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...