Hold on...

[hatsoff]

If that

[hatsoff]

Well mate can you please explain to our listening audience how one can have

Edited March 2, 2007 by hatsoff

[The Lorax]

Now you are asking Darwinian questions to me – does this mean you have changed your mind and you will try to defend the Darwinian position?

I don't advocate Darwinism.

The question I asked you was about 6-day creationism. Let me repeat myself:

If God created all living creatures in the beginning, we would have fossils of all modern animals--birds, lizards, horses, humans--back in the Cambrian Era.

...But we don't. Not even close.

How do you explain that?

Can you answer it this time? And how is it a "Darwinian question"?

Edited March 2, 2007 by Angry Dragons

[GeneV]

Hey guys I thought circular arguments were unscientific

[The Lorax]

Angry – are you living up to your name? Are you angry with me?

Haha. My username is ironic--I'm a very calm person in real life, and I'm not angry now. I just used large fonts so you can't keep ignoring what I am saying!

It is a Darwinistic question

How is it a Darwinistic question?

and you have yet to answer my Darwinist questions to you. Do you remember your advice to me earlier about answering questions is sequence (don’t you play by your own rules)? Are you sure you are not a wee bit Darwinistic in your peculiar worldview?

I'm not a Darwinist. Like most educated people, I support the TOE. Is that what you want to talk about? If you want to have a conversation, you might want to let me speak on my terms and not keep labelling me. It's really quite rude and, no, I don't agree with your label.

Now I'll repeat my question for the second time:

If God created all living creatures in the beginning, we would have fossils of all modern animals--birds, lizards, horses, humans--back in the Cambrian Era.

...But we don't. Not even close.

How do you explain that?

It's just a question about 6-day creationism. Why won't you answer it?

[SaturnV]

As for my bio, I'm currently in my last year of majoring in both Chemistry and Biology. I've also worked as a research assistant for a Behavioral Psychologist. My only appearance in the peer-reviewed literature is an acknowledgement for helping run and analyze his experiments, so I'm hardly a famous scientist, if that's what you were thinking.

Cool, another bio guy!

Is it just a coincidence that everyone here with any amount of scientific training acknowledges evolution?

Probably

I'm actually a Chem guy-but cell biology is just so darned interesting that I have about as many bio credits as chem ones

[SaturnV]

The

[apothanein kerdos]

As for my bio, I'm currently in my last year of majoring in both Chemistry and Biology. I've also worked as a research assistant for a Behavioral Psychologist. My only appearance in the peer-reviewed literature is an acknowledgement for helping run and analyze his experiments, so I'm hardly a famous scientist, if that's what you were thinking.

Cool, another bio guy!

Is it just a coincidence that everyone here with any amount of scientific training acknowledges evolution?

Probably

I'm actually a Chem guy-but cell biology is just so darned interesting that I have about as many bio credits as chem ones

I have a very minimal training in science, yet I still accept it. I'm more into theology/philosophy and history, yet even I can accept almost all tenets of evolution.

Angry, getting to a point you said previously, about using science as your interpretative method. Though science can aid us, you shouldn't us it in everything because of its propensity to change. This would make the Bible itself subjective and therefore unreliable as a measurement of truth.

[hatsoff]

Lol

Edited March 4, 2007 by hatsoff

[hatsoff]

Lol - the first sign of a weak argument that is on the brink of crashing and burning for lack of substance - attacking the person instead of attacking his argument. I am really not too concerned with whom you like and dislike mate and I doubt if Dawkins will lose much sleep either. I am however concerned with the faulty thinking you have displayed on this thread and your failure to recognize scientific truths - you can do much better (I really mean that). Why don