Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  7
  • Topic Count:  13
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  2,054
  • Content Per Day:  0.28
  • Reputation:   351
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  03/15/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Actually with all of the divorce and remarriages and so forth we already practice a form of polygamy, just one wife at a time, but several wives during our life who are all still alive and all have may have kids from one man.

I have heard this called 'serial bigamy.'

:)

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  366
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  10,933
  • Content Per Day:  1.49
  • Reputation:   212
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/21/2005
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

This reminds me of the old marx Brothers bit:

Groucho to woman: I'll marry you, and I will marry her too

Woman: Groucho, that's bigamy

Groucho: Well, it big of me too, but I'm not bragging about it


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  272
  • Topics Per Day:  0.07
  • Content Count:  2,338
  • Content Per Day:  0.59
  • Reputation:   11
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/19/2014
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Actually with all of the divorce and remarriages and so forth we already practice a form of polygamy, just one wife at a time, but several wives during our life who are all still alive and all have may have kids from one man.

I have heard this called 'serial bigamy.'

:)

This reminds me of the old marx Brothers bit:

Groucho to woman: I'll marry you, and I will marry her too

Woman: Groucho, that's bigamy

Groucho: Well, it big of me too, but I'm not bragging about it

:cool:

serial polygamy! never heard of that but it's a good term for it. :thumbsup:


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,513
  • Content Per Day:  0.23
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/05/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/01/1908

Posted

Jesus came here to save us from our sins because there were so many and what people thought was not a sin was, in fact, a sin in the eyes of God. Men who thought it was OK to marry-divorce-marry-divorce-etc, were wrong in what they were doing and Jesus told them so. He made it clear that sexual sin was the same for a man as it was for a woman.

I think Polygamy is better than multiple divorce and remarriage, I will say that.

Wrong. What you're saying is that one sin is better than another. All sin is sin that will keep us out of Heaven. If polygamy were not a sin, neither would polyandry be a sin. Jesus came here and set straight the wicked traditions of men and shed light on the unbalanced scales so that we would see God's standards and correct the scales accordingly. This lightened the loads of some(example:women) and made heavier the loads of others(example:men), but the scales, if obeyed, are balanced. Men must not have liked the way Jesus reset the rules accurately because they keep trying to go back to the old laws that gave them as many women as their hearts desired.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  38
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,790
  • Content Per Day:  0.24
  • Reputation:   27
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/21/2004
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  11/15/1968

Posted

Having more that one "what have you done for me lately" and "honeydo lists" and "it's that time of the month" would drive me to drink. Besides, why would you want more than one wife, when most of us can't handle one woman? :)


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,258
  • Content Per Day:  0.72
  • Reputation:   42
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/16/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/22/1960

Posted
Jesus came here to save us from our sins because there were so many and what people thought was not a sin was, in fact, a sin in the eyes of God. Men who thought it was OK to marry-divorce-marry-divorce-etc, were wrong in what they were doing and Jesus told them so. He made it clear that sexual sin was the same for a man as it was for a woman.

I think Polygamy is better than multiple divorce and remarriage, I will say that.

Wrong. What you're saying is that one sin is better than another. All sin is sin that will keep us out of Heaven. If polygamy were not a sin, neither would polyandry be a sin. Jesus came here and set straight the wicked traditions of men and shed light on the unbalanced scales so that we would see God's standards and correct the scales accordingly. This lightened the loads of some(example:women) and made heavier the loads of others(example:men), but the scales, if obeyed, are balanced. Men must not have liked the way Jesus reset the rules accurately because they keep trying to go back to the old laws that gave them as many women as their hearts desired.

Sure I would agree that no one sin is any better than any other.

However there is not clear scriptural evidence that Polygamy is a sin; including anything from the teachings of Christ. Polyandry was a sin and called out as one, witness the conversation Jesus had with the women who had several men, in addition His discussion on marriage, and Paul's discussion on divorce. We know that polygamy was practiced during the time of Jesus; in fact it was common enough that when speaking of the requirements for a Bishop, scripture specifically says that he should be the husband of only one wife.

The reason it is a sin is that it is illegal, not because of anything specifically in scripture. Now personally I think that Christ did intend for one man and one woman to be together in marriage, and we can point to His discussion in this area of marriage where He does indeed seem to be speaking about one man and one woman alone in marriage.

But the fact is it is not clear. Some things we have to use a little wisdom about ourselves.

If you look a where polygamy is successfully practiced and it is successfully practiced, you have one older wife who serves as the leader of the household and mentor to the younger women. The man usually spends most of his time and counsel with this women.

I think it could be successful. Unfortunately the way it has been practiced in the US by the Mormon fundamentalists it is simply child abuse and child rape, where the


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,513
  • Content Per Day:  0.23
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/05/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/01/1908

Posted

Post #10 should be enough to answer your whole argument, smalcald. If not, then I'm going to say we disagree on these issues and leave it at that. I don't feel it's necessary to reiterate information in the same thread.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  5,258
  • Content Per Day:  0.72
  • Reputation:   42
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  06/16/2005
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/22/1960

Posted

Hi None,

But I don't see any specific scripture you posted in post 10 that we could examine. I am not promoting polygamy by the way and I don't think this should be divisive; it is more interesting to me than anything else. (on a side note as far as young women etc, it is pretty well documented that post-menopausal women have a significant drop in sex drive).

But sex is not the main reason you would look at polygamy. Anyway we should look at the versus surrounding this issue I think they are interesting.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  1,513
  • Content Per Day:  0.23
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/05/2007
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  01/01/1908

Posted

Like I said, I'm not repeating the points I've already made. I will say, though, given the issues you, smalcald, brought up on young women and old men - most young women don't like old men. Plain and simple, they want men their own age. But I have no doubts in my mind that it was an old perverted man who made up the rule that men can have more than one wife. :P


  • Group:  Members
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Topics Per Day:  0
  • Content Count:  30
  • Content Per Day:  0.00
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/25/2007
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Firstly, two specific examples that indicate a pattern.

Jesus points to Creation when speaking of marriage (Matthew 19:4-6)

And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH'? "So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." NASB

Paul speaks of each man/woman having their own wife/husband (1 Corinthians 7:2)

But because of immoralities, each man is to have his own wife, and each woman is to have her own husband. NASB

What are the potential problems that could arise from plurality?

Excessive indulgence, and the risk of being led astray

Increased covetousness amongst those left without wives

Greater risk of perversion and sexual immorality if a shortage of women exists

Multiple spouses not receiving sufficient emotional support and affection

Jealousy and rivalry amongst multiple partners - vying for attention

Is there any basis to support plurality in the New Testament?

What are your thoughts on polygamous relationships endorsed by certain sects in today's society?

Adam and Eve are your/our example. Not Adam, Eve, Mary, Elizabeth, Judy, Melissa, Norma, Clare, and Gertrude.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Oy Vey!
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Well Said!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Brilliant!
        • Loved it!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Well Said!
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...