Global Warming or Global Warning??

[MeCajunboy]

Found this bit of alarming news on the Internet when I woke up this morning, (Friday AM). Do you think this is a Warning for Man, Or a Warning from God?

Scientists Make Dire Forecast for Alaska

By DAN JOLING,AP

Posted: 2007-09-07 01:14:19

Filed Under: Science News

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Sept. 7) - An analysis of 20 years' worth of real-life observations supports recent U.N. computer predictions that by 2050, summer sea ice off Alaska's north coast will probably shrink to nearly half the area it covered in the 1980s, federal scientists say.

[Guest Biblicist]

Maybe it's not a "global warming" or even a global warning. . . maybe it's a temperature readjusting back to what God wanted it to be. . . before we started abusing our atmosphere with hair spray!

[Pizzaguy]

They can't predict tomorrow's high temperature - they sure can't predict ANYTHING about the climate in 20 years.

(In 1974 they were predicting a new ice age - I wonder what scare they'll have for us next?)

[forrestkc]

They can't predict tomorrow's high temperature - they sure can't predict ANYTHING about the climate in 20 years.

(In 1974 they were predicting a new ice age - I wonder what scare they'll have for us next?)

Meteorology and climatology are two completely different fields of science. For example, we may not be able to predict the exact weather 15 days from now at a specific location, but we can reliably predict that next July will be warm.

Moreover, it was never the position of the majority of climatologists in 1974 that we were entering into another ice age.

[hmh]

They can't predict tomorrow's high temperature - they sure can't predict ANYTHING about the climate in 20 years.

(In 1974 they were predicting a new ice age - I wonder what scare they'll have for us next?)

Meteorology and climatology are two completely different fields of science. For example, we may not be able to predict the exact weather 15 days from now at a specific location, but we can reliably predict that next July will be warm.

Moreover, it was never the position of the majority of climatologists in 1974 that we were entering into another ice age.

And it's not the position of the majority of climatologists in 2007 that we are entering into an age of global warming either.

[forrestkc]

They can't predict tomorrow's high temperature - they sure can't predict ANYTHING about the climate in 20 years.

(In 1974 they were predicting a new ice age - I wonder what scare they'll have for us next?)

Meteorology and climatology are two completely different fields of science. For example, we may not be able to predict the exact weather 15 days from now at a specific location, but we can reliably predict that next July will be warm.

Moreover, it was never the position of the majority of climatologists in 1974 that we were entering into another ice age.

And it's not the position of the majority of climatologists in 2007 that we are entering into an age of global warming either.

Actually, you could not be more wrong.

International Statements

Below is a list of joint statements calling for action on mitigating climate change. The National Academies representing the 21 following countries and districts have signed joint statements:

Australia

Belgium

Brazil

Caribbean

Canada China

France

Germany

India

Indonesia Ireland

Italy

Japan

Malaysia

Mexico New Zealand

Russia

South Africa

Switzerland

United Kingdom United States

G8 Statement

National Academy of Sciences: 2007 Joint science academies

[Guest]

"But godliness with contentment is great gain.

For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out." 1 Timothy 6:6-7

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Global warming poses a "serious threat to America's national security" and the U.S. likely will be dragged into fights over water and other shortages, top retired military leaders warn in a new report. The report says that in the next 30 to 40 years there will be wars over water, increased hunger instability from worsening disease and rising sea levels and global warming-induced refugees. "The chaos that results can be an incubator of civil strife, genocide and the growth of terrorism," the 35-page report predicts. -CNN, Report (PDF)

Oh No!

God Wasn't Kidding.

And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.

All these are the beginning of sorrows.

Matthew 24:6-8

This Is True.

For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.

Matthew 24:21-22

Escape

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

John 3:16-18

To God

Keep me as the apple of the eye, hide me under the shadow of thy wings,

Psalms 17:8

Be Blessed Beloved

The LORD bless thee, and keep thee:

The LORD make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee:

The LORD lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.

And they shall put my name upon the children of Israel; and I will bless them.

Numbers 6:24-27

Love, Joe

[hmh]

No forrest, it's already been broadcast that a majority of the climatologists disagree. Unfortunately that is not what we are being told, and it has already been mentioned that those who disagree will lose their jobs and accrediations. So it's not what really is the truth, but what is politically important today and what gets the money and power to control others.

[forrestkc]

No forrest, it's already been broadcast that a majority of the climatologists disagree. Unfortunately that is not what we are being told, and it has already been mentioned that those who disagree will lose their jobs and accrediations. So it's not what really is the truth, but what is politically important today and what gets the money and power to control others.

It has been broadcast on certain propaganda sites that is the case, like much of the anti-science right, its a lie. Challenging prevailing science is the hallmark of modern science. Scientists jump at the chance of making a name for themselves by calling prevailing science into question. Yet, there is not a single article or study published in any peer reviewed journal that challenges basic Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. If the science behind this was so weak, then why is that the case?

Instead of going by the propaganda put out by certain industry and ideological groups, just look at the peer reviewed science behind this issue and make an objective decision on its merits. I think you will come to the same conclusion that the scientific community has came to on this subject. If you would like to discuss the science behind this issue, I would be glad to do so.

[Treasure]

Maybe it's not a "global warming" or even a global warning. . . maybe it's a temperature readjusting back to what God wanted it to be. . . before we started abusing our atmosphere with hair spray!

I don't use hairspray. Does that mean I'm excluded.