Herman Uticks

8 For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man; 9 for indeed man was not created for the woman’s sake, but woman for the man’s sake. 10 Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. I give up, what do angels have to do with order, authority, or head covering?

Decide for yourself:

Why would it only matter concerning opposite genders, in this day and age, isn't it also possible to jump to conclusions about same sex companions? Now, if these people were doing something like kissing, hand holding, or something else suggestive of a lot of familiarity or intimacy, maybe. Otherwise, I have come to think that it is quite difficult to anticipate or control what others think. Jesus was seen in the company of tax collectors and even questionable female companions possibly. In my opinion, and that is all it is, I don't find reason for a lot of concern if they are not checking into a hotel, parking behind an abandoned building, etc, things done in public, could quite possibly be quite innocent, and I would grant them the benefit of a doubt. I was ratted out to my pastor once, because I was drinking apple cider, someone assumed it was champagne. I know first hand that you can be seen as a sinner when doing something that is perfectly okay, so I have learned to be very cautious about making assumptions. At the same time, I think it would be wise of your freind's husband, to consider how things look, as we all should.

I cannot imagine that aircraft manufacturers would equip their planes with wireless networking that would be able to control the aircraft, not can I see any reason to run wired networking into boxes under the seats. Also, it absurd that a passenger would be allowed to mess with it anyway - I am cvry suspicious of the whole story's veracity. Now, if we wanted to explore other possibilities, I could imagine someone leaking a false story, for fun, for notoriety, to scare people, or to manipulate the stock market.

1 Cor 5: 3 For I, on my part, though absent in body but present in spirit, have already judged him who has so committed this, as though I were present. 4 In the name of our Lord Jesus, when you are assembled, and with you in spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus, 5 I have decided to deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of his flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. 11 But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one. 12 For what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church? 13 But those who are outside, God judges. Remove the wicked man from among yourselves. So, what do you suppose Paul is saying here? What do you think it even means to judge others?

I guess I would have to think that it might be set in stone. If God foresees the future, and I beleive he does, then whatever time he sees that happening, is when it will happen. If it changes at some time in His mind, then what He beleived previously, is wrong. God is never wrong. However, since we are not privy to that information, there is not much practical value to the question, that I can see, wonder what your pastor is fishing for.