whatdoIwant2callmyself

How pathetic. I think in some of these type cases the parents are the unfit one's. They ended up with a gender child they didn't want. So they brainwash the kid to believe they're the child they did want , but on the inside. It's a tragedy that this mental illness that's compounded by chemical imbalance is let to be tolerated to the point the victim mutilates themselves with horrific surgeries that deform their God given bodies. It's just plain medical malpractice and abject laziness spurred on by the terrorist threats of the intolerant LGBTQ extremists. Years ago a letter appeared from someone in the American Psychiatric Society. Media didn't give it a whole lot of attention and I suspect it was because they didn't want to suffer death threats from the terrorist LGBTQ groups either. But in any event, it synopsized the decision to amend the future or next publication of the DSM manual. Diagnostic and Statistics Manual concerning mental health diagnosis. The LGBTQ terrorist death threats had been so concentrated that the APA decided to switch rather than fight. So to concede their professional ethics they elected to alter future publications that referred to homosexuality and the tranny diagnosis. Omitting the fact that they are mental illnesses. And rewording their categories so as to say they are disorders instead. That seemed to placate the LGBTQ terrorists and they left the APA alone. But as a further sign that their condition is indeed alteration of the cerebral functionality, the LGBTQ community didn't seem to comprehend the new editions of the AMA's DSM V + reiterated that theirs was a mental illness. Just in a different phraseology so as to avoid threats of death for daring to put that in print. These parents are cowards . Just like the psychiatrist that made the assumption of suicide should the boy not get his wish. God doesn't make mistakes. Fix the mental illness by giving the sufferer proper cocktail of hormone treatments , etc... that corrects their dis-ordered thinking when they look at their own bodies. So that they cope with what is. Because I predict in 20 years the future generation of the medical professionals will look back at what surgeons and psychiatrists are doing now to feed the illness because they're too afraid or lazy to treat it, and realize where we are now is tantamount to dark ages medicine dealing with such conditions. Like in the primitive era of medicine when physicians were putting leaches on someone to take the devil away from their blood disorder. Or cupping their skin in order to heal their mental illness.

I think people of God should discern what God puts before them when seeking wisdom from the father.There are literally thousands of manuscripts and fragments that have been discovered after what was used to compile the canon . And the canon was arrived at by the judgements of men , in political offices of authority over other men. And those men asked all men for all time to believe them when they said, they as the authors of those manuscripts reviewed and judged worthy of the canon, to believe first that those autograph authors did not write what was there. But instead God told them to write what was there. We've held faith from the first word ever inked on any papyrus, scroll, skin. And to this day we hold first to faith that what tells us God is, the Bible, is not of man. Thousands of manuscripts, fragments, etc.... Think about that. I have met Christians that do not believe anything not in the Bible is to be believed to be of God. They don't trust that God speaks to his people today in prayer, or in life. They worship instead the Bible itself and from there derive their faith in God. Going no further to enrich their walk. In your beginning God gave you a brain.

Moody Radio linked on the homepage here > http://www.worthychristianchat.com/cbnnews-radio.php Has an report on this case via CBN news. The governors offense apparently was daring to say that Muslims in Jakarta could be governed by non-Muslims. It is a far more detailed report than what we've found thus far in print media I think.

Not really. It synopsizes the body of the article itself.

I knew the gunman would be martyred in this. A Turk assassinating a Russian ambassador doesn't make sense. Now that he's dead chances of finding more to this assassination are slim.

Well of course I was responding to your remarks. That's why I quoted you when I made my own. I'll keep this short. Pornography between consenting adults on the film is legal. Yes, there are Christians that watch porn. I don't understand why but that's their prerogative. They're voyeurs of of artificial sex acts and if they're single that's their choice. If they're married Christians perhaps they do it to spice up their marriage bed. Whatever the case, that too is their choice as consenting adults. Child pornography is not only illegal, it is obscene. It is child rape. Whether it is still photographs or video it is an abomination. Is it a forgivable sin? Yes, God would forgive. Is it something a female spouse could forgive? Especially if she has children with that pedophile? Could she ever wonder if such abomination gets her husband aroused when viewing other babies in obscene media, are her own babies safe from such a pervert? That would be her choice too. However, if she couldn't reconcile that then God would certainly understand and forgive her for her divorce. Because when Jesus said it is better someone tie a millstone around their neck than to lead a child to sin, I can't imagine God would condemn a woman who divorced a pedophile pervert husband who watches abominable sex acts of children and commits to his own sin of lust for those children in the process. Better a divorce than to kill the sob. Easy choice. Thou shalt divorce. Or thou shalt ask God to forgive a wife for the murder of her pervert husband because some whacked idea that divorce of a pedophile is wrong got stuck in her head by someone who doesn't get how wrong it is to watch child pornography. But that's just me. I have no patience for those who rape children. They're good for two things. Prison or target practice.

Wow. Very young. And not at all credible.Thanks for letting me know.

Then I'll take your prior remarks as a false claim. No one is responsible for proving you're statements. And spin excuses are lame.

I won't predict what president elect Trump will do when he hasn't even been sworn into office as yet. However, there is a 12 vote difference between the Democrats that voted Yea for this final bill as compared to the Republicans. GovTrak S.2943 Votes: 85-13 Edit: P.S. Shadows, do you have the proof I previously asked you to provide to support this prior statement that you made? Trump himself has said he wants the NSA spying on its own citizens program reinstated, if it were ever actually stopped.

I don't know about that. However, it is happening under this administration. This bill : S.3274 - Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act 114th Congress Which was added to the NDAA that Obama signed into existence this text included in the annual update: S.2943 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017114th Congress (2015-2016) Which when passed ended up as this: S.2943 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 114th Congress (2015-2016)

If we go by that standard then the entire Bible can be called into question because the autographs themselves, the original writings from which the 66 books, or 72 books, are gleaned were not used to create today's Bible.

I don't get what you're saying there. The question ultimately is, if your spouse is a pedophile, is divorce OK?

Scriptures tell us that everyone, which would of course include a spouse, who is sexually immoral will not inherit the kingdom of Heaven. Scripture also tells us not to be yoked with unbelievers. If someone is a Christian and they find their spouse in possession of illegal child porn, that person is sexually immoral and an unbeliever. Divorce is an absolute right. And that after telephoning police and turning them in. Because it is our duty to protect innocence also. And especially from sexually immoral people who rape them with their eyes. Which is in part what the vulgar sin of child pornography is. Just like adult pornography, it causes lust in the viewer. Which is also a sin. However, in the matter of it being lust that arises at the sight of a child's naked body, it is beyond comprehension the degree of perverse sin that that is. In the old testament days such a one as that would surely have been stoned to death. In this world they should be put in prison where they'll have to deal with Hell on earth for the duration of sentence . Being inmates no matter what they've done have no patience for such perverted sinners as that.

Please post that proof. Thank you.

Not really. Your remarks were vague while mine were more precise.