JoshuasonFlower

Amen to that! I think what some of us are hoping to achieve is to turn this violation into a reminder of Jesus ministry and purpose. To rebuke through God's word those that would replay the assault against the teachings of Christ and the accusation the Sanhedrin trial levied against him as that of blasphemer. And worthy of death. The replay of that ancient 2000+ year history in contemporary terms on this forum having the Pharisee spirit assail those who are in Christ for being there contrary to their belief they belong is today's blasphemy. Is today's Pharisee at work. MARK 16:16 "He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned." Jesus made it very simple to understand God's divine plan. Condemning how people honor God doesn't take those who are in Christ out the grace of God. No one can remove the Christian from Jesus' hand.

This is so. Thank you for adding that here.

Yes, I do see that. Thank you. The point that was made pertained to the scornful ridicule and hatred directed at the United States of America Commander in Chief being spoken all about in this nation. The question for those who are in Christ and do such things was, would the Christian say those same scornful remarks, levy that same ridicule, that same hatred, and contempt about the child of God that is Donald Trump , repeat it, if that Christian doing that all about in this nation were face to face with God?

These may also be a good resource for study. Bible Geocoding The Table of Nations: Genesis Chapters 10-11 I hope those assist your research.

There's a saying, no one hates Liberals more than the new Leftists. Unfortunately, the new Leftists hate even more the Conservative. And I think that is why standard political commentary concerning the new Republican administration and the majority Republican in both the House and the Senate is so dedicated to viciousness. They're not talking about the talking points of policy change, direction of priorities under the new leadership. They're talking about the man personally. Even going so far as to assail his faith, his wife, and his minor son. What is raising its head in America now is a storm front dedicated to what their candidate of choice and loser Hillary R. Clinton called the resistance. As if a woman of her deplorable record when entrusted to lesser responsibilities would serve with more honor in the highest position of authority. Hillary even championed a four year resistance against our president. She claims herself to be a Christian. The Bible is full of passages warning against hate. Leviticus 19:17. “You shall not hate your brother in your heart, but you shall reason frankly with your neighbor, lest you incur sin because of him. " Did you think you'd ever see those in the faith of our savior hating against other sisters and brothers ? I did not.

There's nothing quite like standing in witness to that which thinks abuse of a person or persons is deemed righteous in God's eyes. Thinking people who love God and Jesus first and foremost would have to show immovable love in a forum on the Internet where abuse awaits them is naive. Thinking people leave because they don't deserve to be abused because they're Catholic or any other Christian denomination is further example they lack something befitting respect from abusive Christians is something else. Ignoring the love Jesus showed those who were not Jewish says quite a lot. Jesus Christ was murdered at behest of those thinking themselves empowered to determine the son of God, Immanuel who was God with us, was worthy of crucifixion because he did not follow what the Sadducee, the Pharisee, commanded was the only way to rightly be called a Jew and worship God. That's why they judged him blasphemer and his miracles bolstered by the power of demons and sought Rome's authority to crucify him before Passover. There are even those in community in the world who will argue Jesus was not Immanuel. I'll leave the doctrine of demons alone being it is up to the Christian to discern for themselves what they witness and read in order to know if they arrive at reading demonic teachings wherever they may go.

The IOC is keeping on the record the medals as won by Bruce Jenner? That's excellent. At one time there was a petition circulated asking the IOC to revoke Jenner's medals because it was against IOC rules for someone to compete in an event not aligned with their gender. I guess when the IOC was at first on the fence about this whole thing that maybe that drive for the revocation made IOC stand for what was right. It's a start.

Years ago Soviet Russia paraded its rockets and weapons capacity in red square while the world watched. It was found out that those rockets that were tied to the flatbed trailers carrying them were fake. They were tied down so that the winds wouldn't blow them off the trucks and reveal the secret. I think Jung-un is following that same track. Now claiming to have bio-weapons that can bring about the end of the world or near to it is a tactic to back off the eagle. North Korea doesn't have an official bird or animal to represent its nation and government. However, the Chollima, a winged horse, does appear in Pyongyang. Scriptures that refer to the eagle and horse or flying horse come to mind. But why be afraid? We know the truth. And we know where we're going if it all comes to an end.

I think the medical profession betrayed its duty and oath when this type mental illness, and I believe it is so, is given approval by the profession that should address the infirmity. Rather than agree to drug, surgically mutilate, the afflicted at their request. Trans identity today at one time was known as Gender Identity Disorder in the psychological professions Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. What is referred to as the DSM. It is reproduced every so often with updates so as to appear over the years as DSM IV, DSM V, and so forth. Now, the latest DSM does not have GID listed as a mental and emotional disorder. The same occurred with homosexuality being afforded a change. Both transitions in mental health diagnosis criteria occurred under threat, sometimes death threats, of those afflicted. So now the profession dedicated to helping those in mental conflict has conceded its responsibility and its oath for two select groups of the afflicted. And with that hurdle overcome the afflicted are pursuing more and more opportunity to achieve concession through the same avenues of assault. Even on the lay community and most especially against Christians. A man that dresses as a woman and even goes so far as to surgically mutilate his God given genitalia is not nor shall he ever be a female. It is rare that a man go that far but as with Bruce Jenner it does happen. After all that that man is still a man. Now however he is a man with implants and surgical mutilations below the waist . And he happens to have a woman's wardrobe in his closet. We Christians won't change the world that is falling at a faster rate into the pit . But I do believe we are able to hold to our faith and determination not to concede. Regardless of the soft persecution that confronts us so as to persuade that surrender. It's really easy actually.Do not consent to refer to a Transfemale using female pronouns. Same with a Transmale. Use the pronouns that fit their God given truth. Stand for what's right and true. Because what is evil and false is intent on gaining the upper hand in persuading the world to that end. Achieving if they have their way a visual reality that affirms, up is down. Down is up. Female is male. Male is female. And righteousness is against the law.

I didn't mean to offend. Which is why I said at the beginning of my remarks that I pray for your understanding. Your observation is on point in that it is not fruit producing to find fault with the Christians here due to the opinion of some who think they're entitled. This entire thread from the title inviting attention to it is something I can understand now happening as that which formerly as someone recalled, led the Catholic members of this community to leave. The title is a direct communication against a new level of membership here. That Catholics departed appears to give incentive to have another identity of Christian follow. Is this type thread how it started against the Catholics? If so, what is the fruit of the spirit that pursues a new group to ostracize? Maybe the tare is what sprouts in the field first. Know them by their fruits was the warning in scripture. Christians are suppose to work together in community. Upholding the word of God, and each other, in the spirit and same love as Christ has for his church. Christ seated himself among the outcasts in society. He sought out the unclean, the persecuted, the untouchables. His own disciples took issue with that and confronted him about it and he informed them of his deep and abiding love and purpose. I've read over this forum and others. And there appears to be arisen an intention to divide, not bond the community of Christ together. To say to those who are identified in those remarks with that purpose and who stand to read that that they are not fit to be here. Because they are not one of us. What purpose is there to sew discord? What fruit is wrought for the effort expended? The Catholics left due to that? Who's intended to be next? What effort is purposed to insure there is a next? And how would that occur but for more than one opinion thinking there is deservedly a Christian among us worthy of being next? Rather than participate in sewing discord into the fabric of Christ's church joining with that which initiated the weave why don't we rebuff that intention by being Christ like in our example of his love? Jesus was sent to save the whole world from its sins. What example are we if we identify one group among our own as unworthy of being in his covenant due to our opinion of what that covenant means to them. The teachings of Jesus are I believe something to reflect upon when encountering that. Because if it is a matter of sameness, I think it wise to recall that Christianity is not the religion of Jesus. It is the religion about Jesus. Judaism was the religion of Jesus. Therefore, when ridicule is produced repeatedly to say any Christian is not truly in Christ because of their manner of worship making them unqualified to be so named, I believe it wise to remember that about Christianity that the Christians follow. And the Judaism that our Lord and Savior followed.

I think you are responding in error to the wrong poster here. I have never implied nor said I believe Donald Trump is a savior to Christians. What I actually said in full text and not just the excerpt you quoted in order to address your remarks toward me, is the bible says God chooses the leaders he places over us. There are more than one discussion thread here that mocks, ridicules, insults president Trump. And in some cases, those Christians who voted for him. My actual point was for all that that occurs toward Donald Trump, and in consideration of that scripture I refer to, would those same critics make those same remarks about God's choice, as scripture tells us, president Donald Trump , to God's face? I don't think they would. That is actually what I communicated. I never once compared Trump to God.

Romans 2:14-15 Are you saying there was no law of God in Abraham's time?

Evil avails itself of any opportunity to express itself does it not? Live streaming on FB or any other popular site is a natural avenue for evil to exploit. A horrible tragedy this is. Hopefully though the public that watched or heard about this vicious murderous evil can bring it to a stop by bringing the alleged murderer to justice. There is a $50,000.00 reward for the capture of Steve Stephens. Pictured above. And from the linked article, Yahoo News God's speed to the capture of this man.

I didn't think she was referring directly to me. I just wanted to be certain she understood since she chose my post to make the comment in that she was aware I have never reported anyone. And as you did here, I did so for the purpose of clarification. I appreciate yours. I was simply providing mine.

For the record, I have not reported anyone.

You're missing something. I was not the one that introduced Hitler into this discussion.

I'm not going to pass judgement. Donald Trump states he is in Christ. Donald Trump was baptized into First Presbyterian Church in Jamaica, Queens. It is between him and God. There is no religious test to run for nor attain the office of president of the U.S. .

I wonder if all this expense is tax deductible on Soro's and Hillary's 2017 tax report. More to look forward to for the next four years. The most expensive loser tantrum in history.

Having his uncle eaten alive by starved dogs mistreated for the express purpose of killing Jung-un's blood uncle is any help in answering that.

What a timely affirmation in a time when the church is being assailed by the enemy that would think some who are in faith are not in Christ. Wonderful posting brother.

I followed the conversation that I participated in. And I followed what you quoted when you said that was your point. Your remarks don't have to be in response to my post when your remarks hope to further what has already been claimed against American history and Christians. I believe you know what you meant when you replied to gator. I'm telling you neither you nor Gator know what you're speaking of when you invoke American history as sustaining your criticisms of Christians who support Trump.

Don't you see the conflict in terms ? For someone to say American history facts really doesn't matter. And to then assert proof of that in their own errant remarks about the founding documents of American history. No, "nuff" hasn't been said.Because what has been said thus far is error. Therefore your point was not made on the fact of American history but rather on the fact errors in American history are invoked as enough to make your point. That's not helpful.

Is there.

Yes, I understood the relationship to the left. That was an excerpt concerning Adolf Hitler's psychological profile and drafted by the United States Office of Strategic Services during WW2. I wanted to add this as a point of reference for the above. http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/oss-papers/text/oss-profile-03-02.html

The first thing I think of under the banner of reputable journalism is Marie Claire. I didn't read the article I admit. Marie Claire was warning enough but the headline was the certain reason to not waste that kind of time. All anyone need do to save time they'll never get back in reading that material that is this side of the Hollywood rags is to scroll down to Marie's suggestion as to what else to read. I personally think this bit of news is vital for my memory banks to absorb and retain. What about you? Kate Middleton curtseys perfectly for the Queen as royal family attends Easter mass The world would end if Ms.Middleton had messed that up. War, blood in the streets, rockets red glare.