Jump to content
IGNORED

Church and State


Recommended Posts

Guest glorytothelord
Posted

My belief is that Church and State, being separate entities, should also be separate when it comes to government ie. the government of the country should be by civilians and the Churches by the leaders of whichever denomination it may be.

Opinions please.

Glory.

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Isn't that how it is now?

:laugh:

I can't remember anyone but a "civilian" ever being in government. What does that have to do with the church, though?

Are you trying to say that only secular atheists should be allowed to hold public office?


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

The problem is that people take the concept of Church and State too far. What Thomas Jefferson meant in 1802 when he coined this phrase was that the government cannot make any law that respects or benefits a religion when it does not benefit the community. Such as what was occuring with the Danbury Baptist Association in that they were being charged a tax by the Anglican church and this was supported by the local government. However moral laws can be seen to benefit the community thus are allowed.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  512
  • Topics Per Day:  0.06
  • Content Count:  8,601
  • Content Per Day:  1.08
  • Reputation:   125
  • Days Won:  2
  • Joined:  07/16/2003
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  12/04/1973

Posted
The problem is that people take the concept of Church and State too far. What Thomas Jefferson meant in 1802 when he coined this phrase was that the government cannot make any law that respects or benefits a religion when it does not benefit the community. Such as what was occuring with the Danbury Baptist Association in that they were being charged a tax by the Anglican church and this was supported by the local government. However moral laws can be seen to benefit the community thus are allowed.

To top that off, though I don't remember the source, Jefferson said he wasn't the utmost authority on the Constitution when asked for his opinion on something and referred the person to someone else who in his opinion was more knowledgable.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
The problem is that people take the concept of Church and State too far. What Thomas Jefferson meant in 1802 when he coined this phrase was that the government cannot make any law that respects or benefits a religion when it does not benefit the community. Such as what was occuring with the Danbury Baptist Association in that they were being charged a tax by the Anglican church and this was supported by the local government. However moral laws can be seen to benefit the community thus are allowed.

To top that off, though I don't remember the source, Jefferson said he wasn't the utmost authority on the Constitution when asked for his opinion on something and referred the person to someone else who in his opinion was more knowledgable.

Jefferson was in France when the during the writing and ratification of the constitution so it would be logical he'd do this, however I never saw that in his letter.

What is interesting is that many people choose to ignore the entire letter and even the unedited version. Jefferson closes the letter out asking for prayers. Likewise, in the unedited version he explains what he means by "Seperation of Church and state":

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" thus building a wall of eternal separation between Church & State. Congress thus inhibited from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to execute their acts, I have refrained from prescribing even those occasional performances of devotion, practiced indeed by the Executive of another nation as the legal head of its church, but subject here, as religious exercises only to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each respective sect,Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience I shall see with friendly dispositions the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced that he has no natural rights in opposition to his social duties. (bold is the edited part)

So, at least to me, by looking at the original text, we can see exactly what Jefferson meant.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  80
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  700
  • Content Per Day:  0.09
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  10/12/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

this would go over real big in the state of utah if they had to seprate the 2 in that state.

just a pun no insult intended

In Christ

IreneM

:laugh:

Guest antitox
Posted

This is stating that congress can make no law concerning religion. This intent was to prevent a state religion from being enacted. That's where the cause of freedom is allowed in individual worship throughout the nation. Today's justices/judges totally misinterpret this (with the help of crooked lawyers) to mean that there can be no religious expression or objects allowed in public places (especially Christianity) which is absurd. Freedom is being eroded on the basis of corrupt interpretation.


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  331
  • Topics Per Day:  0.04
  • Content Count:  8,713
  • Content Per Day:  1.14
  • Reputation:   21
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/28/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
This is stating that congress can make no law concerning religion. This intent was to prevent a state religion from being enacted. That's where the cause of freedom is allowed in individual worship throughout the nation. Today's justices/judges totally misinterpret this (with the help of crooked lawyers) to mean that there can be no religious expression or objects allowed in public places (especially Christianity) which is absurd. Freedom is being eroded on the basis of corrupt interpretation.

They just need to be fair if they do it. If the local city hall put up a nativity scene because some Christians wanted it, they would have to put up decorations for a Muslim holiday when one rolled around as well.


  • Group:  Junior Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  4
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  117
  • Content Per Day:  0.02
  • Reputation:   0
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/29/2004
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
They just need to be fair if they do it. If the local city hall put up a nativity scene because some Christians wanted it, they would have to put up decorations for a Muslim holiday when one rolled around as well.

And that's where the problem comes in. The typical response ranges from resisting any nonChristian displays to hiding them. Do you know how many religions there are in this country let alone the world? If every religion that wanted to have access to public land had to be granted access there would be no room left in the parks. Entire government buildings would be given over entirely to housing religious displays.

Lets put it this way. Satanism is a recongised religion. Do you really want the US government displaying a tribute to Satan?

The best course for government and religion is to not get involved with one another. Your churches and houses are where you should display your religious zeal. In that format it is an appropriate display of personal pride and joyousness about your beliefs. But in a government setting it becomes so many other things that your message of love and joy are occluded and all that comes through is oppression and competition.


  • Group:  Diamond Member
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  1
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  764
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   6
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  12/01/2003
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

Lets go with what God says.

Deut 17:14-15

14 When thou art come unto the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me;

15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.

(KJV)

Judg 5:9

9 My heart is toward the governors of Israel, that offered themselves willingly among the people. Bless ye the LORD.

(KJV)

Judg 5:14

14 Out of Ephraim was there a root of them against Amalek; after thee, Benjamin, among thy people; out of Machir came down governors, and out of Zebulun they that handle the pen of the writer.

(KJV)

Ps 22:28

28 For the kingdom is the LORD's: and he is the governor among the nations.

(KJV)

Ps 47:2-3

2 For the LORD most high is terrible; he is a great King over all the earth.

3 He shall subdue the people under us, and the nations under our feet.

(KJV)

Ps 47:7-8

7 For God is the King of all the earth: sing ye praises with understanding.

8 God reigneth over the heathen: God sitteth upon the throne of his holiness.

(KJV)

Isa 9:7

7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.

(KJV)

Hosea 8:4

4 They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not: of their silver and their gold have they made them idols, that they may be cut off.

(KJV)

Matt 2:6

6 And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel.

(KJV)

2 Pet 2:10

10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.

(KJV)

To take God out of government is an act of foolishness, and dirct disobedience, and this country will pay a big price for doing so.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Praying!
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
        • Thumbs Up
      • 20 replies

×
×
  • Create New...