We don't need no stinking doctrine?

[Openly Curious]

Lol...

[His_disciple3]

It all depends on how you define "doctrine". So the question is moot. 

 

If you don't agree with my doctrine, yours is wrong sort of thing....

the question is not MOOT, scripture says it is given for Sound Doctrine, and it says in the end men will turn from sound doctrine such as many have said we don't need doctrine

[His_disciple3]

to teach that doctrine divides and we don't need doctrine is doctrine within itself, you can't have No doctrine. so to say we have no doctrine is a lie, the one who preaches no doctrine is a lair. you want to sit under a Lair as teacher or Pastor, they have doctrine which is no doctrine. that's a FACT JACK

[Guest]

to teach that doctrine divides and we don't need doctrine is doctrine within itself, you can't have No doctrine.

 

so to say we have no doctrine is a lie, the one who preaches no doctrine is a lair.

 

you want to sit under a Lair as teacher or Pastor,

 

they have doctrine which is no doctrine.

 

that's a FACT JACK

 

 

:24:

 

~

 

True

 

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Timothy 3:16-17

 

False

 

But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. Matthew 15:9

[EagleWay]

Not only necessary, but a major blessing.  imo

 

[another_poster]

to teach that doctrine divides and we don't need doctrine is doctrine within itself, you can't have No doctrine. so to say we have no doctrine is a lie, the one who preaches no doctrine is a lair. you want to sit under a Lair as teacher or Pastor, they have doctrine which is no doctrine. that's a FACT JACK

doesn't really come across as speaking in love. comes across as rather aggressive. You may like to think about that and your wording and if think you should change it next time then do so. If not just ignore. 

Now care to actually address the post you quoted? The second line is the key to understanding it. Clearly Fez is not talking about correct doctrine but how everyone thinks they have totally correct doctrine. Obviously everyone can't be right when their views are different. Also definitions are very important. I have seen christians sit is a room arguing for an hour when they actually agree all because they had a different definition of a word. 

[enoob57]

to teach that doctrine divides and we don't need doctrine is doctrine within itself, you can't have No doctrine. so to say we have no doctrine is a lie, the one who preaches no doctrine is a lair. you want to sit under a Lair as teacher or Pastor, they have doctrine which is no doctrine. that's a FACT JACK

doesn't really come across as speaking in love. comes across as rather aggressive. You may like to think about that and your wording and if think you should change it next time then do so. If not just ignore. 

Now care to actually address the post you quoted? The second line is the key to understanding it. Clearly Fez is not talking about correct doctrine but how everyone thinks they have totally correct doctrine. Obviously everyone can't be right when their views are different. Also definitions are very important. I have seen christians sit is a room arguing for an hour when they actually agree all because they had a different definition of a word.

Rom 13:14-14:1

14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh,

to fulfil the lusts thereof.14 Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but

not to doubtful disputations.

KJV

We are an unbelievably weak in our vessels of flesh but in s(S)pirit we know

exactly what you are saying... Love, Steven

[neophyte]

Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the DOCTRINE which ye have learned; and avoid them. [ Romans 16: 17 - ]

[other one]

Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the DOCTRINE which ye have learned; and avoid them. [ Romans 16: 17 - ]

 

At this point in time, which doctrine are we going to accept as right....    If I was born into a family that attended the Church of Christ, am I to have to believe that none of you here that are not members of that doctrine have a chance to enter heaven.....

Things are not as they were in the first century.

[neophyte]

It never implies that God has newly disclosed the truth to mankind. It means, rather, that a truth which God had revealed to the church at the time of the apostles has now become sufficiently clarified and is of enough importance to warrant its presentation to the members of the church for their explicit assent. Example the doctrine of the Trinity. In other words all doctrine must be accepted, including those doctrine that have been lodged within the Christian church's teaching from the beginning and though it had been at least imlicidly believed by every Christian who ever lived, thus becoming a mandatory and explicit doctrine of the Christian Faith. see also- [ Romans 16:17-18 ] [ 1 Cor.1: 10 ]