ayin jade Posted June 19, 2015 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.87 Content Count: 43,799 Content Per Day: 6.19 Reputation: 11,244 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Author Share Posted June 19, 2015 This mass division is fueled by people who are getting stupidly rich off of playing their part. The Becks and Hannity and Colberts of the nation are the well paid pied pipers driving the wedge deeper and deeper.   You think they are fueling it?  Obama is fueling the division between blacks and whites. Sharpton certainly does his part to further the division. The media has done its part to further the division. And not the ones you mentioned. Take a look at how any crime is reported. If its black on white crime it is minimized. If its white on black crime or even if its not racially motivated but just happens to be white on black, there are riots etc fueled by sharpton and the media. I havent seen such racial issues since the 60s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted June 19, 2015 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 599 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,260 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,988 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted June 19, 2015 If we don't find a way to stop this we are headed to another "Tulsa Oklahoma 1921" happening, only maybe across the whole country before it's over.... Â It's almost inconceivable that this bit of history could repeat itself..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted June 19, 2015 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.87 Content Count: 43,799 Content Per Day: 6.19 Reputation: 11,244 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Author Share Posted June 19, 2015  This mass division is fueled by people who are getting stupidly rich off of playing their part. The Becks and Hannity and Colberts of the nation are the well paid pied pipers driving the wedge deeper and deeper.   You think they are fueling it?  Obama is fueling the division between blacks and whites. Sharpton certainly does his part to further the division. The media has done its part to further the division. And not the ones you mentioned. Take a look at how any crime is reported. If its black on white crime it is minimized. If its white on black crime or even if its not racially motivated but just happens to be white on black, there are riots etc fueled by sharpton and the media. I havent seen such racial issues since the 60s.   I read a media article just today attacking wealthier people in california blaming them for the drought, despite the fact that a good part of the article was about how wealthy people are trying to tear up their landscaping and put in xeriscaping (low water use) despite their homeowner association guidelines. And despite the fact that their water use is 5% or less of the water use in california. The article did not come from the 3 you mentioned or any conservative source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncertain Posted June 19, 2015 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 239 Content Per Day: 0.07 Reputation: 226 Days Won: 2 Joined: 06/02/2015 Status: Offline Birthday: 05/20/1959 Share Posted June 19, 2015 You don't have a link do you, I would like to read it. Also, where do you get the 5% number from? What does the article consider "wealthier" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncertain Posted June 19, 2015 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 239 Content Per Day: 0.07 Reputation: 226 Days Won: 2 Joined: 06/02/2015 Status: Offline Birthday: 05/20/1959 Share Posted June 19, 2015 If we don't find a way to stop this we are headed to another "Tulsa Oklahoma 1921" happening, only maybe across the whole country before it's over.... Â It's almost inconceivable that this bit of history could repeat itself..... Has it occurred to you that might be the plan? Great excuse to strip away a lot of freedoms. Look at how much we gladly gave up after 9/11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted June 19, 2015 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.87 Content Count: 43,799 Content Per Day: 6.19 Reputation: 11,244 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Author Share Posted June 19, 2015 You don't have a link do you, I would like to read it. Also, where do you get the 5% number from? What does the article consider "wealthier"  The article didnt define it but one of the enclaves they mentioned had a median income of 189k. That isnt really rich, but it is above average income. So I used the term wealthier. The 5% came from elsewhere. I would have to dig around to try and find the article again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted June 20, 2015 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.09 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted June 20, 2015   In the real world all that matters is what the court say, everything else is just opinion, opinion that changes nothing. Speech comes with consequences, you may not like it or agree with it...but it is a fact of life.  Actually, that isn't correct. The courts are bound to uphold Constitutional law....not to make laws. Activist judges have been bending things but it's our fault, we the people, for allowing them to get away with that. In my experience an activist judge is one that makes decisions you don't like, nothing more. In the case at hand I see nothing in the Constitution that would preclude a person being fired for what they said, Shiloh357 on the other hand does. So who other than the courts would decide such a thing? This is the sort of thing the courts exist for.   Also incorrect. An activist judge makes or changes the law. The job of the judicial branch is to INTERPRET the law. It's unusual to see an American upholding the court system; kinda goes against the grain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted June 20, 2015 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Activist Judges are those who attempt to legislate from the bench, deciding what is right and wrong for Americans. The court's job is to interpret the law and in the case of the Supreme Court, the purpose is to check the legislative branch from creating laws that violate the constitution.  Being an activist judge violates the Constitution because an activist is not impartial. Judges are to impartially interpret the law. An activist Judge cannot be an impartial interpreter of the law.  The courts have often exceeded their boundaries. The courts have been used in the past to negate or override local/state elections, which is not their job.  Uncertain, your comments still continue to reflect that fact that you don't know what you're talking about.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncertain Posted June 20, 2015 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 239 Content Per Day: 0.07 Reputation: 226 Days Won: 2 Joined: 06/02/2015 Status: Offline Birthday: 05/20/1959 Share Posted June 20, 2015 Nobody ever complains when a judge makes a decision they agree with, but as soon as they don't the judge us an activist judge. It is just a buzz word the party leaders throw out to rile up the masses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncertain Posted June 20, 2015 Group: Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service Followers: 0 Topic Count: 4 Topics Per Day: 0.00 Content Count: 239 Content Per Day: 0.07 Reputation: 226 Days Won: 2 Joined: 06/02/2015 Status: Offline Birthday: 05/20/1959 Share Posted June 20, 2015 In the real world all that matters is what the court say, everything else is just opinion, opinion that changes nothing. Speech comes with consequences, you may not like it or agree with it...but it is a fact of life.  Actually, that isn't correct. The courts are bound to uphold Constitutional law....not to make laws. Activist judges have been bending things but it's our fault, we the people, for allowing them to get away with that. In my experience an activist judge is one that makes decisions you don't like, nothing more. In the case at hand I see nothing in the Constitution that would preclude a person being fired for what they said, Shiloh357 on the other hand does. So who other than the courts would decide such a thing? This is the sort of thing the courts exist for.  Also incorrect. An activist judge makes or changes the law. The job of the judicial branch is to INTERPRET the law. It's unusual to see an American upholding the court system; kinda goes against the grain. Why would an American not uphold the court system? Without it we would be a lawless nation. Would you prefer we didn't have a court system? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts