God created Science, The Lord is the Great Mathematician and Designer

[Davidjayjordan]

Just now, post said:

did my post go right over the top of your head . . . ?  
look, if you don't understand what i was talking about, jut say so. i probably didn't do a very good job explaining the theory.
 

the finches on the Galapagos island have been extremely well studied and their changes of many generations have been directly observed, changes that directly correlate with changes in the environment. this is what's called "evolution." 

what this theory says, is that a Galapagos finch does not develop a smaller, differently-shaped beak over a few tens of generations, which happens to be perfectly suited to the changes in the types of nuts that are present on the island, as those trees change, by random mutations being naturally selected through random breeding. that's the 'traditional' explanation of how animals change over time. 

instead, the finch is purposefully adapted to the change in the type of nuts that are present on the island by selection from a variety of possible beak designs that are already built into the animals DNA. there is no "junk DNA" - that DNA that appears to be junk is latent possibility. now, the finch's parents don't get together and say "look, the nuts seem to be getting smaller. there's a disease killing off the trees that have the larger nuts, and jr may need to change his feeding habits. let's have a baby bird with a different beak." -- and the baby bird in its egg doesn't get it's birdie-sense tingling and decide to mutate. no, God knows what is going on, and starts giving little birdie parents the right kinds of babies. that's how this theory works. 

see, this is an intelligent design argument. 
i just wondered if you'd heard of it, but i'm guessing "no" 


 

Differ again, Darwin saw overwhelming evidence of the worldwide flood in his travels on the Beagle as well as Veilosky

Finches beaks do not change they just have the God given abiolity to eat different nuts and food sources, like us and many other animals.

A use does not and never will change our DNA, I repesat sexual DNA is separated at the very early stages of embrionic development, so that nothing that species does in its life time effects the next generation. Nothing as in nothing. Us eating more and more shells is still not going to give the next generation of people along the coast line, a tongue to separate clam shells, never ever , never. evolution is bogis and unscientific

[post]

And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind,

and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind:

and God saw that it was good.

(Genesis 1:25)
 

[post]

2 minutes ago, Davidjayjordan said:

Finches beaks do not change they just have the God given abiolity to eat different nuts and food sources, like us and many other animals.

the beaks of what are called "Darwin's finches" have physically changed average shape and size over many generations. 
this has been directly observed and cataloged. we're not talking about just "using their beaks in a different way" but literal changes in the animal. 

this is adaption that is a God-given ability for the animal to eat different food sources; it's not just random mutation that turns out to have some benefit for one or two birds while the rest of the population starves to death and can't have babies because the food supply has changed, it is purposeful adaption designed and implemented by God -- that's what this theory says, 'in a nutshell' 

do you understand that? 
it seems like you're not fully comprehending what i'm talking about. 



 

[Davidjayjordan]

Size doesnt matter as us males realize, three inches is sufficient, as with beaks.

 

As for inbreeding, as with dogs, again size of a dog again does not make a new species. Ask a dachshound as every inbreeding generation brings out weaknesses not strengths even though the inbreeding seemingly makes a new dog. A dog is a dog.... dogs dont produce cats over the long run or short run or erratic run.

[Davidjayjordan]

10 minutes ago, post said:

And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind,

and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind:

and God saw that it was good.

(Genesis 1:25)
 

Very true, simple truth verified by true history and true biology.

[post]

10 minutes ago, Davidjayjordan said:

Us eating more and more shells is still not going to give the next generation of people along the coast line, a tongue to separate clam shells, never ever , never. evolution is bogis and unscientific

that is not even close to anything any evolutionary theory has ever said happens. 

besides, no one eats clam shells with their tongues. we use oyster shuckers 
and in fact, we've "evolved" better tools over time through invention and trial-and-error
 

[Davidjayjordan]

Evolution never happened therefore we should eliminate the word evolve in all our writings.

 

Our tongues remain Adam and Eve tongues, rather wily and untamed but the same as before. As BEFORE, so NOW, no different.

Same below and same above and same within. Again size doesn;t matter.

The lineage of Adam and Eve remains intact and exact, and the insanity of billions and billions of slow changing evolving years is destroyed and blown to the wind of those without a rock solid foundation in history and biology and more.

[Davidjayjordan]

Lets get back to math and physics..... and scalar energy and TOE...... and the Great Mathematician.

 

Evolutionists have NO Math, no equations, nothing as in nothing..... excerpt majority opinion and majority force and domination.

[post]

2 minutes ago, Davidjayjordan said:

Size doesnt matter as us males realize, three inches is sufficient, as with beaks.

 

As for inbreeding, as with dogs, again size of a dog again does not make a new species. Ask a dachshound as every inbreeding generation brings out weaknesses not strengths even though the inbreeding seemingly makes a new dog. A dog is a dog.... dogs dont produce cats over the long run or short run or erratic run.

dude, i think you're just not getting it. 
the beaks on these birds have literally changed over the span of a couple hundred years. it's a fact. being willfully blind to it doesn't explain how that happened. 

i have no idea why suddenly you're talking about genitalia and inbreeding, out of the blue. 

dogs are another interesting example, though mankind has had their hands all over it: 
there are many species of dogs that have arisen through purposeful breeding programs: breeding one particular dog with another to try to produce different traits ((not "inbreeding" them with their brothers and sisters, OK?)) -- so thousands of years ago, when people first started living with wolves etc. and domesticating them, none of these breeds existed. but at that time, the possibility of all those different breeds existed inside those first domesticated dogs DNA -- it was brought out over time through purposeful breeding selection - not by random mutations, but by strengthening & highlighting certain aspects of what already existed in the dogs. 

that's "evolution" of a type but not what is normally thought of -- actually, now i'm not sure what you think "evolution" is.. 
 

[post]

12 minutes ago, Davidjayjordan said:

Very true, simple truth verified by true history and true biology.

what do you think "after its kind" means ?

And God made the beast of the earth after his kind