missmuffet Posted November 13, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted November 13, 2016 1 hour ago, ayin jade said: Not one president has ever been able to carry through with each one of their campaign promises so I wont hold him accountable if he fails to carry through with some of them. (After all congress and the senate can interfer with that.) However what I expect to see is attempts made to carry through with them. I expect he will make the border less porous and start the wall being built in arizona like it was supposed to be built years ago. I do not expect it to happen before he takes office or even within the first few months. So if a voter is not looking at what a candidate promises because they know they will not be able to carry out those promises what is the point? We will not be able to see the full impact until he takes office but there is a lot out there now regarding where he is going with America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted November 13, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted November 13, 2016 How many voters do you think did not vote for Hillary because they did not want a woman President? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willa Posted November 13, 2016 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 68 Topic Count: 186 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 14,242 Content Per Day: 3.33 Reputation: 16,656 Days Won: 30 Joined: 08/14/2012 Status: Offline Share Posted November 13, 2016 I don't think that the sex had as much to do with it as her proven lack of character--Ben Ghazi, graft [pay per view], lying under oath, and the same Marxist agenda. But she probably got the lesbian vote. The biggest reason I voted for Trump is that he promised to appoint conservative judges. Some of the bussed in demonstrators have admitted to being paid to demonstrate by Soro, and I think that community organizers are also paid since that is the first job Obama held. I just hope that all those people whining that they want to leave the country will do so. We don't need them here if they hate us. Nor do we need anarchists, rioters and people who want to destroy us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayin jade Posted November 14, 2016 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 44 Topic Count: 6,178 Topics Per Day: 0.88 Content Count: 43,795 Content Per Day: 6.21 Reputation: 11,243 Days Won: 58 Joined: 01/03/2005 Status: Offline Share Posted November 14, 2016 1 hour ago, missmuffet said: So if a voter is not looking at what a candidate promises because they know they will not be able to carry out those promises what is the point? We will not be able to see the full impact until he takes office but there is a lot out there now regarding where he is going with America. Because I know he will try to accomplish it all and succeed at some of them. What he wants to accomplish is more in line with what I want to see done than what hillary or any of the third party choices would do. It seems like he isnt even in office yet and folks are tearing him down for not getting anything done lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted November 14, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted November 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Davida said: I think she got an untold number of votes from young women & feminists just because of her gender. But what about all of the men who could not stand the thought of a woman President? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted November 14, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.35 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted November 14, 2016 4 hours ago, Out of the Shadows said: Reuters is an international news agency that has nothing to do with the DNC or Hillary Clinton. Well Reuters polls were rigged as much as anyone else's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted November 14, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.81 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted November 14, 2016 5 minutes ago, Davida said: I know none. Any one like Hillary did who places her female gender as a Campaign platform deserves to have that backfire in her face. It is totally wrong to vote because of gender or race as people did for Obama and we saw how mistaken that was. But it happens if people want to admit it or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted November 14, 2016 Group: Royal Member Followers: 16 Topic Count: 134 Topics Per Day: 0.04 Content Count: 8,142 Content Per Day: 2.35 Reputation: 6,612 Days Won: 20 Joined: 11/02/2014 Status: Offline Share Posted November 14, 2016 7 minutes ago, missmuffet said: But what about all of the men who could not stand the thought of a woman President? They were right, since is a CRIMINAL woman President would do untold harm. And in any event, this is not really a job for women. Check out all the tears from Clinton, Abedin, and left-liberal female celebs and media personalities. I am also strongly opposed to having women mixed with men is services such as the armed forces, police forces, fire-fighting etc. There is bound to sexual tension, on-the-romances, accusations of sexual assaults (whether true or false), and just a lot of nonsense which is not necessary. However there is no reason while strictly female divisions cannot be created in these services. And women should definitely not be on the battlefield, since there are plenty of other jobs they can do. As was noted for Marines, the physical standards had to be lowered for women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 14 minutes ago, missmuffet said: But what about all of the men who could not stand the thought of a woman President? Men have no problem with a woman president, generally speaking. Most of us would vote for a woman who demonstrated that she was capable and ready to be president. You might have pockets of those who would oppose it, but they would be the minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Churchmouse Posted November 14, 2016 Group: Diamond Member Followers: 4 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 2,216 Content Per Day: 0.80 Reputation: 1,014 Days Won: 0 Joined: 09/29/2016 Status: Offline Birthday: 04/02/1958 Share Posted November 14, 2016 11 minutes ago, missmuffet said: But what about all of the men who could not stand the thought of a woman President? What about all the women who can't stand someone using an irrelevant issue like sex to support a run for office? Martin Luther King once said he would be happy when his children would be counted by the content of their character instead of the color of their skin. What's less important the color of the skin or the sex of the person in that skin? Identify politics are the cesspool of the liberal elites and you see where they are today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts