All three Abrahamic Religions will join forces

[RealPresence]

2 minutes ago, Yowm said:

If you believe everything the Orthodox Jews say, you will end up denying Christ...jus sayin.

That's a silly statement.

If you believe the Jews at the time of Jesus, you would deny Him also.

[Guest shiloh357]

1 minute ago, RealPresence said:

I'm having a LOT of issues with DUPLICATE POSTS.
Every time I click on "Quote" to respond to a post - it only allows me to respond to a post that I already responded to.

Any idea how to fix this??
Also - any idea how to delete duplicate posts?

You will need to get with the mods about deleting the dupes.   It's just a glitch that happens every now and again.  No remedy for it that I am aware of. 

[RealPresence]

6 minutes ago, 7thseal said:

I'm not living to bash, but living. If  you seriously can't find where these changes has been made... then I'll post them. It has nothing to do with Catholics, we're all brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ. I strongly suggest that you atleast  post what the Pope said on this subject?

Uhhh, no - the onus is on YOU to provide the evidence.

YOU are the one who made this ridiculous claim so YOU need to prove it.

[RealPresence]

1 hour ago, Yowm said:

And if they heard of Jesus through the Gospel but reject Him, you think they still serve the same God?

Problem is they don't know the Father in the first place...

Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also.
(Joh 8:19)
 

 

And you keep dodging the question, so I will ask you again:

Is Jesus God?
Is the Father God?
Is the Holy Spirit God?

OR - are they ONLY God when spoken of as a Trinity and not as distinct Persons?

 

[RealPresence]

10 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

Orthodox Judaism is rooted in a lot mythology and a false historical recollection of their religion.   They are not an accurate source for where their religion came from.

Ummm, NO 21st century Jews would be an accurate source by that logic because NONE of them practice sacrificial Temple Judaism.
The plain fact of the matter is that YOU are the first person i have ever heard or read that makes this silly claim.  Jewish scholarship is against you yet you still make this claim.

The others here simply jumped on your bandwagon because they don't know any better and they like arguing with Catholics.

[7thseal]

6 minutes ago, RealPresence said:

Uhhh, no - the onus is on YOU to provide the evidence.

YOU are the one who made this ridiculous claim so YOU need to prove it.

Please respond, if it's false.

 

http://www.americamagazine.org/content/dispatches/pope-francis-and-top-sunni-leader-meet-vatican

[Ezra]

1 hour ago, RealPresence said:

Probably for the SAME reason they added "For thine is the kingdom, the power, and the glory forever" to the Lord's Prayer in Matt. 6 - because they didn't know any better.  That line is NOT from Scripture but was added in.  It is from the 1st century document, "The Didache" (Teachings of the Twelve Apostles).

RP,

Kindly stop promoting your nonsensical and unbiblical ideas on this forum.  If you want to know THE TRUTH about this very critical omission, do some serious research. The omission is from CORRUPT manuscripts, but this is not the thread for that discussion.

2 hours ago, RealPresence said:

anyway, scholarly consensus states that Paul was not the author of Hebrews.

Thanks for warning Christians that *scholarly consensus* (just like the MSM) is invariably WRONG. It is the so-called scholars who have mercilessly attacked the Bible and Bible doctrine.

[RealPresence]

32 minutes ago, 7thseal said:

Please respond, if it's false.

 

http://www.americamagazine.org/content/dispatches/pope-francis-and-top-sunni-leader-meet-vatican

As i have stated on post after post after post - this is a mission of PEACE - not religious change.
And NOWHERE in this article does it mention the lie YOU told about the Pope "changing" the Catholic Bible to include Muslims.

Why would you say such an outrageous claim without any evidence??

[other one]

2 hours ago, RealPresence said:

And, as I have reminded you - the word "Christianity" isn't in the Bible either, so why would you guys use it?

The word "Incarnation" isn't in the bible and neither is the word "Trinity" - yet these are BOTH Biblical truths.
For that matter, the word "Bible" isn't in the Bible, so why do you call it "The Bible"??

Again - Judaism has been around since God gave Moses the Law - and Jesus fulfilled it.

And i say the word doesn't relate to mosaic law for that pertained to Israel as a whole, not just to Juda or Jews.

[RealPresence]

18 minutes ago, Ezra said:

RP,

Kindly stop promoting your nonsensical and unbiblical ideas on this forum.  If you want to know THE TRUTH about this very critical omission, do some serious research. The omission is from CORRUPT manuscripts, but this is not the thread for that discussion.

Thanks for warning Christians that *scholarly consensus* (just like the MSM) is invariably WRONG. It is the so-called scholars who have mercilessly attacked the Bible and Bible doctrine.

Do you know what an "omission" is?  An omission is when you leave something OUT.
This phrase was added into the Bible.  It comes from the  1st century document, "The Didache" (Teachings of the Twelve Apostles).

Sometimes, the Catholic monks who transcribed the Scriptures for several hundred years would put footnotes in the manuscripts.  This is one example where the footnote made it into the pages of Scripture.

Anyway - this simply shows that the so-called "perfect" translation of the KJV is NOT so perfect.
That's also why the KJV called Paul the author of Hebrews, when the manuscript evidence debunks that idea.