Jump to content
IGNORED

Internet shocked to hear VP Pence won't dine alone with a woman other than his wife


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  352
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   128
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/18/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
4 minutes ago, Out of the Shadows said:

He is speaking of me, he just won't say so.  It is one of those passive aggressive maneuvers.

While I support his freedom to to do this, I find the reasoning to be faulty and to be based upon a sexist attitude.

I'm still looking for the internet shock that the article is speaking about.  I have seen no such nor actual concern that Pence wont dine alone with another woman. 


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  15
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  573
  • Content Per Day:  0.19
  • Reputation:   329
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/27/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

I find it amazing that a man's free choice to show his wife respect is ridiculed at all. But to interject the idea that it is an offense to equality is a reach to levy insult. What a shame. 


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.22
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 minute ago, ruck1b said:

I'm still looking for the internet shock that the article is speaking about.  I have seen no such nor actual concern that Pence wont dine alone with another woman. 

There were a dozen or two tweets about it, I guess that is what they consider a "shock". 


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.22
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Just now, Danger Noodle said:

I find it amazing that a man's free choice to show his wife respect is ridiculed at all. But to interject the idea that it is an offense to equality is a reach to levy insult. What a shame. 

I agree it should not be ridiculed, it is his choice.  But that does not mean one has to agree with the logic behind it

Guest shiloh357
Posted
13 minutes ago, ruck1b said:

Show me where anyone is finding fault with it?

Oh the media is mocking him about it incessantly about. And the same thing is on social media.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/30/liberals-attack-mike-pence-for-being-faithful-to-his-wife/

https://twitter.com/ClaraJeffery/status/847199851733434369

They call him sexist:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/mike-pence-and-the-sexism-of-the-billy-graham-rule/521328/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mike-pence-is-why-we-have-to-stop-excusing-religious_us_58de92d9e4b0ca889ba1a567

So the liberals think that Mike Pence, because he goes the extra mile, to honor his wife is "sexist."   It is completely absurd and shows the damaged, warped moral compass of the liberals that honor one's marriage vows is now sexist.   The enemy is tearing apart the family and as you can see, now many are in league with him in it.  

 

Guest shiloh357
Posted
5 minutes ago, Danger Noodle said:

I find it amazing that a man's free choice to show his wife respect is ridiculed at all. But to interject the idea that it is an offense to equality is a reach to levy insult. What a shame. 

How does honoring his marriage suddenly mean that he views women as second class citizens? 

He is actually honoring the marriage covenant for others as well.  I am sure that other men and women, who are not liberal, lesbian feminists are appreciative that in honor HIS marital covenant, he is also honoring theirs, as well.   Most men would not like another man eating dinner alone their wives.   Most women would not want their husband eating alone with another woman.  

 


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  5
  • Topic Count:  15
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  573
  • Content Per Day:  0.19
  • Reputation:   329
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  03/27/2017
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
2 minutes ago, shiloh357 said:

How does honoring his marriage suddenly mean that he views women as second class citizens? 

He is actually honoring the marriage covenant for others as well.  I am sure that other men and women, who are not liberal, lesbian feminists are appreciative that in honor HIS marital covenant, he is also honoring theirs, as well.   Most men would not like another man eating dinner alone their wives.   Most women would not want their husband eating alone with another woman.  

 

Great question. :) One that VP Pence's detractors would likely have a hard time answering soberly and without venom. 


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.22
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
1 minute ago, shiloh357 said:

How does honoring his marriage suddenly mean that he views women as second class citizens? 

He is actually honoring the marriage covenant for others as well.  I am sure that other men and women, who are not liberal, lesbian feminists are appreciative that in honor HIS marital covenant, he is also honoring theirs, as well.   Most men would not like another man eating dinner alone their wives.   Most women would not want their husband eating alone with another woman.  

 

Spoken like someone who has never been married.


  • Group:  Royal Member *
  • Followers:  8
  • Topic Count:  91
  • Topics Per Day:  0.03
  • Content Count:  10,596
  • Content Per Day:  3.22
  • Reputation:   2,743
  • Days Won:  25
  • Joined:  06/16/2016
  • Status:  Offline

Posted
Just now, Danger Noodle said:

Great question. :) One that VP Pence's detractors would likely have a hard time answering soberly and without venom. 

It is not hard at all.  There is nothing in the marriage convent about eating dinner with a member of the opposite gender.   It all comes down to trust and the level of the relationship.  If a man or woman has an issue with their spouse having meal with a member of the opposite gender, then there are deeper trust issues in the marriage that need to be addressed. 


  • Group:  Removed from Forums for Breaking Terms of Service
  • Followers:  0
  • Topic Count:  24
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  352
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   128
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/18/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Posted

 

22 minutes ago, Out of the Shadows said:

It is not hard at all.  There is nothing in the marriage convent about eating dinner with a member of the opposite gender.   It all comes down to trust and the level of the relationship.  If a man or woman has an issue with their spouse having meal with a member of the opposite gender, then there are deeper trust issues in the marriage that need to be addressed. 

Weird my post disappeared. 

I personally wont be eating dinner with another woman alone, but then again I'm not in a business where I may have to.  I have had lunch with female coworkers and don't have an issue with that.  However I think this ridiculous that anyone would find an issue with him doing this.  It is petty and downright childish.  None of us know his reasoning for this so its silly at the end of the day.  As far as the internet shock and ridicule, lets not exaggerate this.  For the few  hundred people that had something to say about it there millions more that don't really care.  Let's stop making mountains out of molehills.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Our picks

    • You are coming up higher in this season – above the assignments of character assassination and verbal arrows sent to manage you, contain you, and derail your purpose. Where you have had your dreams and sleep robbed, as well as your peace and clarity robbed – leaving you feeling foggy, confused, and heavy – God is, right now, bringing freedom back -- now you will clearly see the smoke and mirrors that were set to distract you and you will disengage.

      Right now God is declaring a "no access zone" around you, and your enemies will no longer have any entry point into your life. Oil is being poured over you to restore the years that the locust ate and give you back your passion. This is where you will feel a fresh roar begin to erupt from your inner being, and a call to leave the trenches behind and begin your odyssey in your Christ calling moving you to bear fruit that remains as you minister to and disciple others into their Christ identity.

      This is where you leave the trenches and scale the mountain to fight from a different place, from victory, from peace, and from rest. Now watch as God leads you up higher above all the noise, above all the chaos, and shows you where you have been seated all along with Him in heavenly places where you are UNTOUCHABLE. This is where you leave the soul fight, and the mind battle, and learn to fight differently.

      You will know how to live like an eagle and lead others to the same place of safety and protection that God led you to, which broke you out of the silent prison you were in. Put your war boots on and get ready to fight back! Refuse to lay down -- get out of bed and rebuke what is coming at you. Remember where you are seated and live from that place.

      Acts 1:8 - “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses … to the end of the earth.”

       

      ALBERT FINCH MINISTRY
        • Thanks
        • This is Worthy
        • Thumbs Up
      • 3 replies
    • George Whitten, the visionary behind Worthy Ministries and Worthy News, explores the timing of the Simchat Torah War in Israel. Is this a water-breaking moment? Does the timing of the conflict on October 7 with Hamas signify something more significant on the horizon?

       



      This was a message delivered at Eitz Chaim Congregation in Dallas Texas on February 3, 2024.

      To sign up for our Worthy Brief -- https://worthybrief.com

      Be sure to keep up to date with world events from a Christian perspective by visiting Worthy News -- https://www.worthynews.com

      Visit our live blogging channel on Telegram -- https://t.me/worthywatch
      • 0 replies
    • Understanding the Enemy!

      I thought I write about the flip side of a topic, and how to recognize the attempts of the enemy to destroy lives and how you can walk in His victory!

      For the Apostle Paul taught us not to be ignorant of enemy's tactics and strategies.

      2 Corinthians 2:112  Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

      So often, we can learn lessons by learning and playing "devil's" advocate.  When we read this passage,

      Mar 3:26  And if Satan rise up against himself, and be divided, he cannot stand, but hath an end. 
      Mar 3:27  No man can enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he will first bind the strongman; and then he will spoil his house. 

      Here we learn a lesson that in order to plunder one's house you must first BIND up the strongman.  While we realize in this particular passage this is referring to God binding up the strongman (Satan) and this is how Satan's house is plundered.  But if you carefully analyze the enemy -- you realize that he uses the same tactics on us!  Your house cannot be plundered -- unless you are first bound.   And then Satan can plunder your house!

      ... read more
        • Praise God!
        • Thanks
        • Thumbs Up
      • 230 replies
    • Daniel: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 3

      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this study, I'll be focusing on Daniel and his picture of the resurrection and its connection with Yeshua (Jesus). 

      ... read more
      • 13 replies
    • Abraham and Issac: Pictures of the Resurrection, Part 2
      Shalom everyone,

      As we continue this series the next obvious sign of the resurrection in the Old Testament is the sign of Isaac and Abraham.

      Gen 22:1  After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, "Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am."
      Gen 22:2  He said, "Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains of which I shall tell you."

      So God "tests" Abraham and as a perfect picture of the coming sacrifice of God's only begotten Son (Yeshua - Jesus) God instructs Issac to go and sacrifice his son, Issac.  Where does he say to offer him?  On Moriah -- the exact location of the Temple Mount.

      ...read more
      • 20 replies
×
×
  • Create New...