Running Gator Posted May 4, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.68 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted May 4, 2017 1 hour ago, shiloh357 said: No, it is not semantics. No one said a guy chopping firewood without a shirt on was filth. It was the issue of public nudity. A little more intellectual honesty would be helpful. What about a gal chopping firewood without a shirt on, would that be filth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted May 4, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted May 4, 2017 9 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: Yeah, 'cause those voices defending biblical values are just crazy Well now you are putting words into my mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 Just now, Running Gator said: What about a gal chopping firewood without a shirt on, would that be filth? Yes, it would be inappropriate as that would be public nudity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 Just now, LadyKay said: Well now you are putting words into my mouth. I didn't accuse of saying anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted May 4, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.68 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted May 4, 2017 Just now, shiloh357 said: Yes, it would be inappropriate as that would be public nudity. So, it is ok for a man to display public nudity but not for a woman. thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Running Gator said: So, it is ok for a man to display public nudity but not for a woman. thanks! Nope. A man without his shirt off is not nudity. A woman exposing her breasts IS nudity. Again, you're not being intellectually honest. Par for the course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Running Gator Posted May 4, 2017 Group: Royal Member * Followers: 8 Topic Count: 91 Topics Per Day: 0.03 Content Count: 10,596 Content Per Day: 3.68 Reputation: 2,743 Days Won: 25 Joined: 06/16/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted May 4, 2017 Just now, shiloh357 said: Yes, that's even in our laws. So, if the law does not prohibit a woman to be topless, then it would be ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyKay Posted May 4, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 12 Topic Count: 385 Topics Per Day: 0.10 Content Count: 7,692 Content Per Day: 1.93 Reputation: 4,809 Days Won: 3 Joined: 05/28/2013 Status: Offline Share Posted May 4, 2017 3 minutes ago, shiloh357 said: I didn't accuse of saying anything. You know what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shiloh357 Posted May 4, 2017 Share Posted May 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Running Gator said: So, if the law does not prohibit a woman to be topless, then it would be ok? If a woman is topless it is considered nudity or at least partial nudity. A man going topless is not. The laws could change and allow a woman to go topless, but that would still be nudity and still be against the Word of God and it is filthy. Just because something is legal, doesn't make it right, or moral. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorningGlory Posted May 4, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 0 Topic Count: 1,022 Topics Per Day: 0.16 Content Count: 39,193 Content Per Day: 6.10 Reputation: 9,977 Days Won: 78 Joined: 10/01/2006 Status: Offline Share Posted May 4, 2017 This thread is really unedifying for anyone reading as a guest. Can y'all just agree that a Christian KNOWS when they are being modest and when they are not and stop nailing these silly petty points to the wall? Everyone knows that topless women are not acceptable and no one looks twice at a shirtless man. Why is it worth arguing over? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts