other one Posted July 29, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,162 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,884 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted July 29, 2017 2 hours ago, missmuffet said: That smart phone is not embedded into your body. so if you fall and break a bone are you going to refuse the screws they use to hold a bone together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted July 29, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,162 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,884 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted July 29, 2017 2 hours ago, Yowm said: It tracks you with plenty of information about you as you carry it on your person. Same difference. Who knows, maybe a similar device will be used to see if you bow down to the Image before your purchase. those little chips only identify who you are. All the information that may be attached to that identity is not in the Chip. And the only way it can track you is us you are within a reader all the time.... and so far all I have seen the readers have a range of less than two feet. They are basically the same as a credit card with a very short range wifi built in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted July 29, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,162 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,884 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted July 29, 2017 So if we go to a single payer insurance across the country and they use the chip to identify us as patents and there is no sign of the beast or antichrist or whatever you want to call him are you going to refuse health insurance coverage even though they will make you pay for the tax to cover it anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted July 29, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.79 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 29, 2017 57 minutes ago, other one said: smart phones are much worse than a chip. All a chip does is identify who you are..... or anyone else that has your chip cloned. The chip will have numerous information about a person. A micro chip can have as much information as the person who inserts it wants it to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted July 29, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.79 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 29, 2017 58 minutes ago, other one said: so if you fall and break a bone are you going to refuse the screws they use to hold a bone together. What does that have to do with the microchip? I am trying to wrap my brain around that one. Would you let your employer implant a chip into you oo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted July 29, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.79 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 29, 2017 52 minutes ago, other one said: So if we go to a single payer insurance across the country and they use the chip to identify us as patents and there is no sign of the beast or antichrist or whatever you want to call him are you going to refuse health insurance coverage even though they will make you pay for the tax to cover it anyway? That is not an option now. The chip so far is not mandatory. But there will come a time during the seven year tribulation that you will not be able to refuse the chip or your life will be on the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted July 30, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,162 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,884 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted July 30, 2017 2 hours ago, missmuffet said: The chip will have numerous information about a person. A micro chip can have as much information as the person who inserts it wants it to have. The ones in this thread only identify a person. There isn't room in these injectable chips for a lot of information.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missmuffet Posted July 30, 2017 Group: Royal Member Followers: 34 Topic Count: 1,991 Topics Per Day: 0.48 Content Count: 48,689 Content Per Day: 11.79 Reputation: 30,343 Days Won: 226 Joined: 01/11/2013 Status: Offline Author Share Posted July 30, 2017 2 hours ago, other one said: The ones in this thread only identify a person. There isn't room in these injectable chips for a lot of information.. There is potential for those injectable chips to have a lot of information. Your whole medical records can be put in it as an example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
other one Posted July 30, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 29 Topic Count: 598 Topics Per Day: 0.08 Content Count: 56,162 Content Per Day: 7.56 Reputation: 27,884 Days Won: 271 Joined: 12/29/2003 Status: Offline Share Posted July 30, 2017 5 hours ago, missmuffet said: There is potential for those injectable chips to have a lot of information. Your whole medical records can be put in it as an example. that is not true MM. The records are kept in a server by the company that sells the chips. The doctor accesses that server to see your medical records, assuming your doctor has agreed to store your records there. You need to really read up on these things. the chips are limited to about 1kb of data. If you use ASCII coding that limits the things to about 125 actual letters and numbers to store.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis1209 Posted July 30, 2017 Group: Worthy Ministers Followers: 18 Topic Count: 347 Topics Per Day: 0.13 Content Count: 7,479 Content Per Day: 2.70 Reputation: 5,382 Days Won: 1 Joined: 09/27/2016 Status: Offline Share Posted July 30, 2017 15 hours ago, missmuffet said: Would you get a microchip at your employment? I'm going to assume this question may infer to the "Mark of the Beast"? Assuming it doesn't... Absolutely positively and a qualitative resounding NO! On secular grounds; I control what goes in and on my body, potential unintended health and privacy issues and abuses, and other reasons. If a person is paying attention, more and more companies are offering their employees implanted microchips on a mandatory and/or voluntary basis. So far "our courts" deem the mandatory implants un-Constitutional, and are requiring an external solution, but it appears about 25% of a companies employees who have the voluntary option chose to take them (for convenience, advancement and not to rock the boat). If Helen Keller were with us today, even she would see where all this bio-metric information is leading to. They continue to miniaturize and expand the data a microchip can hold, soon it will be the size of a grain of salt. With the advent of a cashless society and/or one world global currency, or the difficulty of purchasing products on the internet needing bio-metric information for identity, etc., the sheep will line up for the slaughter. A personal observation with nothing derogatory intended: It appears the percentage of the population that voluntarily get tattoos, body piercings, Botox and implants has exponentially exploded in this age. What's something the size of a grain of rice or smaller going to hurt for the convenience and/or privilege to be an efficient consumer and loyal employee? Just the rantings of an old man... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts