Jump to content
IGNORED

Creation using Evolution


pgardner2358

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  536
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   563
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  06/06/2018
  • Status:  Offline

1 minute ago, brujaq said:

I must've been talking about another new one, :doh:. Sorry Rock 

There are three versions that I know of, each with a different view of a time relationship. No need to be sorry at all Brother!

:)

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  536
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   563
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  06/06/2018
  • Status:  Offline

6 minutes ago, siegi91 said:

Yes, well. 

the problem I have is that free will is hugely challenged by these ontologies. For instance, the idea that the universe preserves information, does not give any space to the introduction of novelty.

According to what we know today, the configuration of bits I am causing on computers by writing this post, was in principle deductible by the microstate of the Universe millions years before my birth. So, what was my freedom?

I did not have any.

:) siegi :)

 

That may be true Siege91. Have to give that one more thought. Oh, there is no millions of years ago. Everything is in the "spotlight" which is always "now". BTW,. you could have chosen not to write with these "bits"!:)

Cheers!!!

Edited by RockyMidnight
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  223
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/15/2018
  • Status:  Offline

11 minutes ago, siegi91 said:

Good for you

:) siegi :)

Did you know that time will come to an end , better start working on a theory for that soon..

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  35
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,795
  • Content Per Day:  1.19
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Just now, brujaq said:

Did you know that time will come to an end , better start working on a theory for that soon..

We know form Einstein that time is not objective.

Therefore, I am not sure what it means to say that something not objective will come to an end.

:) sieglinde :)

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  536
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   563
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  06/06/2018
  • Status:  Offline

1 minute ago, brujaq said:

Did you know that time will come to an end , better start working on a theory for that soon..

Then what is Eternity Brujaq?

Cheers!!! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  35
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,795
  • Content Per Day:  1.19
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2015
  • Status:  Offline

Just now, siegi91 said:

Duplicate

 

 

Edited by siegi91
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  1
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  223
  • Content Per Day:  0.10
  • Reputation:   76
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  06/15/2018
  • Status:  Offline

Just now, RockyMidnight said:

Then what is Eternity Brujaq?

Cheers!!! :)

Eternal supernatural existence 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  35
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,795
  • Content Per Day:  1.19
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2015
  • Status:  Offline

8 minutes ago, RockyMidnight said:

That may be true Siege91. Have to give that one more thought. Oh, there is no millions of years ago. Everything is in the "spotlight" which is always "now". BTW,. you could have chosen not to write with these "bits"!:)

Cheers!!!

Could I have?

I am not sure.

By the way, I am sure we would be very famous if we could prove that we can introduce novelty in the physical state of the Universe that is not deducible by prior states.

That is law -1. The most fundamental of all, and it comes before all others. Hawking challenged it. And he lost.

:) siegi :)

 

Edited by siegi91
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Senior Member
  • Followers:  6
  • Topic Count:  10
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  536
  • Content Per Day:  0.25
  • Reputation:   563
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  06/06/2018
  • Status:  Offline

1 minute ago, siegi91 said:

 

Somehow, I see a "choice" in these duplicates!!!:laugh:

Cheers Siegi91!!!:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Nonbeliever
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  35
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  3,795
  • Content Per Day:  1.19
  • Reputation:   249
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/04/2015
  • Status:  Offline

3 minutes ago, RockyMidnight said:

Somehow, I see a "choice" in these duplicates!!!:laugh:

Cheers Siegi91!!!:)

Yes, sorry. lol

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...