Jump to content
IGNORED

Abolishing Perversion


Archangel Thyos

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  2
  • Topic Count:  14
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  134
  • Content Per Day:  0.07
  • Reputation:   22
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/13/2018
  • Status:  Offline

If the US Government defined and abolished perversion, what would happen?

 

How has abolishing perversion been perverted in the past?

 

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,259
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5,866
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/09/2009
  • Status:  Offline

3 hours ago, Archangel Thyos said:

How has abolishing perversion been perverted in the past? 

It's always has been around, since the fall.........

"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun."
Ecclesiastes 1;9
 

  • Brilliant! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Advanced Member
  • Followers:  3
  • Topic Count:  23
  • Topics Per Day:  0.00
  • Content Count:  235
  • Content Per Day:  0.04
  • Reputation:   166
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  01/29/2008
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  09/20/1972

Just look at history; how well did it go over when the government tried to abolish alcohol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  28
  • Topic Count:  338
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  15,710
  • Content Per Day:  2.46
  • Reputation:   8,526
  • Days Won:  39
  • Joined:  10/25/2006
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  02/27/1985

You cant abolish sin of any kind. Has never worked, never will. To attempt to would be tyranny, which always corrupts.

  • Loved it! 1
  • Brilliant! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PinkBelt
8 hours ago, Archangel Thyos said:

If the US Government defined and abolished perversion, what would happen?

 

How has abolishing perversion been perverted in the past?

 

Any thoughts?

How do you define "perversion"?

I do not like government telling people how to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,259
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5,866
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/09/2009
  • Status:  Offline

5 hours ago, PinkBelt said:

How do you define "perversion"?

I do not like government telling people how to live.

John Adams  “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PinkBelt
1 hour ago, Gary Lee said:

John Adams  “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

How this answers my question I'm unsure.

Regardless, here is the quote in context:

"But should the people of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another, and towards foreign nations, which assumes the language of justice and moderation, while it is practising iniquity and extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming pictures of candor, frankness, and sincerity, while it is rioting in the rapine and insolence, this country will be the most miserable habitation in the world. Because we have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

John Adams was close friends with Thomas Jefferson, a man who was disdainful of Christianity and religion in general. They shared many philosophical beliefs with regards to morality and the churches role in society. Adams was a Christian sure, but he certainly was not advocating some church/state enmeshment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Worthy Ministers
  • Followers:  14
  • Topic Count:  32
  • Topics Per Day:  0.01
  • Content Count:  5,259
  • Content Per Day:  0.97
  • Reputation:   5,866
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/09/2009
  • Status:  Offline

2 hours ago, PinkBelt said:

How this answers my question I'm unsure.

 

8 hours ago, PinkBelt said:

How do you define "perversion"?

I do not like government telling people how to live.

I should have said, "I agree", with your post, which I do along with most citizens. My apologies for not making it more clear, PinkBelt.
I also saw the lengthy article, the same one you saw and quoted, and realized the author (
James Finn, an atheist, see below ) also said many people take it out of context. I disagree. Adams said it. James Finn in his agenda, gave his version, and that's OK.
I was trying to avoid making a detour, as is now happening. The OP ask 
"How has abolishing perversion been perverted in the past?"  I posted there is no new sin, and that our government, our Constitution, was prayed over and over by our founding fathers at it's inception, and was designed for a moral people.   That's all. Moral laws are bull dozed over by immoral people. Look around you today. Who tries to keep the law, who ignores the law? And changes it, militantly? (see below)



THIS BELOW is his signature on articles. HIS WORDS. (look him up)
James FinnWriter.

"Runner. Marine. Airman. Former LGBTQ and HIV activist. Former ActUpNY and Queer Nation. Polyglot. Middle-aged, uppity faggot."        

You might understand now, PinkBelt, why I chose to ignore his blather. I chose to quote Adams. 

       "The Holy Ghost carries on the whole Christian system in this Earth. Not a baptism, not a marriage, not a sacrament can be administered but by the Holy Ghost. . . . There is no authority, civil or religious – there can be no legitimate government – but that which is administered by this Holy Ghost. There can be no salvation without it.All without it is rebellion and perdition, or in more orthodox words, damnation."
John Adams...........

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  12
  • Topic Count:  385
  • Topics Per Day:  0.10
  • Content Count:  7,692
  • Content Per Day:  1.93
  • Reputation:   4,809
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  05/28/2013
  • Status:  Offline

My extent as to what I think the government should do about "perversion" is that it should protect the unwilling and innocent from it. As for what consenting adults do, that is their business and between them and God. 

Edited by LadyKay
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Royal Member
  • Followers:  18
  • Topic Count:  200
  • Topics Per Day:  0.05
  • Content Count:  2,795
  • Content Per Day:  0.65
  • Reputation:   1,502
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  06/25/2012
  • Status:  Offline
  • Birthday:  07/26/1952

I agree that we can't pass laws to abolish immorality but neither should we keep making immorality legal. Why? Let me explain. Every new generation has to learn what's right and what is wrong for themselves. But they still learn lessons from the older folks and their government. But many perversions deeply disturb us when we do them. If that perversion is legal a person may have to reach 50 before he realizes how bad it is. This is why we shouldn't legalize perversions.

  • Brilliant! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...